Thanks for the response, but you're answering a different question than
I asked. :) The question I'm interested in is, Why is the recursive
server not pegging the CPU?
I should have quoted Sten's context. If the recursive answer
contains additional data, that may contributing to the time
In article mailman.1996.1389470377.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Blason R blaso...@gmail.com wrote:
Pertaining to the same discussion. Can someone validate below zone files
and named.conf files? What I wanted to achieve here is; I wanted to make
mail.example.com as my sub domain and give them
On Jan 11 2014, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
(2) There is no requirement that a domain name refer to the Web
site for that domain. I personally don't like that (for no special
reason), and neither apparently does the owner of this domain, who
forces people to go to the trouble of typing in
You previously showed your unsuccessful rndc command. It contained:
'type slave; file slaves/zone.local;
Unless you override the defaults, that says:
use the file /var/named/slaves/zone.local.
So it appears that the directory /var/named/slaves was not writable.
Hth,
Len
On
On 12.01.14 17:16, Doug Barton wrote:
Without going into too much detail, doing some performance testing
and am seeing a weird result. On the same systems authoritative
queries will happily peg the CPU. However when running recursive
queries (with a small zone, all data cached before testing)
Seems previously I made some mistake when tried to make writable
/var/named... Currently chmod g+w /var/named resolved the problem.
Thanks to all!
2014/1/13 Leonard Mills l...@yahoo.com
You previously showed your unsuccessful rndc command. It contained:
'type slave; file
On 13/01/14 01:16, Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
Without going into too much detail, doing some performance testing and
am seeing a weird result. On the same systems authoritative queries will
happily peg the CPU. However when running recursive queries (with a
small zone, all data cached before
We'd deployed named v9.9.4 with the patches from
BIND9 RRL and RPZ Patches
http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
...
Multiple Zone Response Policy Zone (RPZ2) Speed Improvement
with Response Rate Limiting (RRL)
BIND9 9.9.4
file rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch, version
On 13/01/2014 17:27, pgndev wrote:
Can anyone clarify specifically the *diff* between rpz1, as in the
Bind9 release, and rpz2? Particularly, which specific
features/capabilities I need to unwind to get back to 'just' rpz1?
IIRC there's no syntax/feature difference. Rather, RPZ2 is a set of
IIRC there's no syntax/feature difference.
Quickly attempting to use the existing, same named config that I've
been using with 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14 with a new build of 9.9.4-P2
release, 9.9.4-P2 refuses to boot. I've not (yet) gotten any farther
than that ...
... shouldn't be tough to figure
On 1/10/14, 8:36 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
There seems to be a pile of misconceptions here.
Joseph,
1. No one from this list that answered to my original question actually showed
any degree of confusion, (including myself). There were only observations on
the subject, nothing more...
2. All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlLUTDoACgkQL6j7milTFsH5sgCfXRrP/D54ZM88CQnOQcNDTOPA
On 01/13/14 03:43, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.2022.1389603219.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On Jan 11 2014, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
(2) There is no requirement that a domain name refer to the Web
site for that domain. I
Hmmm, from what I vaguely recall from my software engineering days, was
that memcpy() didn't ever handle overlapped memory buffers and that you
should consider memmove() in such cases.
Doesn't really make sense that it should, though I think I first learned
about this during a code review. Don't
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:44:22PM -0600, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
Hmmm, from what I vaguely recall from my software engineering days, was
that memcpy() didn't ever handle overlapped memory buffers and that you
should consider memmove() in such cases.
Yes, that's correct, and in fact
OK, I am getting this error dumping master file: tmp-xxx: open: permission
denied, occasionally, on both my slave DNS servers and I can't seem to fix it.
The dns slave files are being written into /var/named/etc/namedb/slave which is
owned by bind
8 drwxr-xr-x 2 bind wheel 1024 Jan 13 19:46
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Why does the *need* to be info as the existing patches works other
than for the version file which for the fix by hand is pretty
obvious or you can just leave it as it is in 9.9.4-P2.
The patch devs have been silent on their
In message 8919443e-8f62-48cd-8da4-9c9632fc5...@kreme.com, LuKreme writes:
OK, I am getting this error dumping master file: tmp-xxx: open:
permission denied, occasionally, on both my slave DNS servers and I
can't seem to fix it.
The dns slave files are being written into
In message CAHv26DioGqAy5G3_Ni_q5=0a6t3hnotvk00eo6oqh6nxoan...@mail.gmail.com
, pgndev writes:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Why does the *need* to be info as the existing patches works other
than for the version file which for the fix by hand is pretty
You appear to want people to supply you with a new patch
Oh, THAT's what I wanted? Thanks SO much for clearing that up!
... and unless you are paying Vernon to support you he is under no obligation
to respond
to you. ...
You can keep bloviating, but it still doesn't mean you have the
20 matches
Mail list logo
