Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-19 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:19:31PM -0400, Maria Iano wrote: > We have a group of users that need to use a wildcard record in > their zone. Their wildcard works in general, but they have a > situation where it isn't working. They had some records that they > deleted, and expected the wildcard to

wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-19 Thread Maria Iano
We have a group of users that need to use a wildcard record in their zone. Their wildcard works in general, but they have a situation where it isn't working. They had some records that they deleted, and expected the wildcard to take over, but it hasn't. If we query a record that doesn't exist and

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am 19.06.2017 um 16:56 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: since DNS don't care about the PTR but mail does what is your problem that you need stupid dicussions instead just agree that it can't do harm and in doubt is beneficial to have just one hostname, use that one hostname in helo_name and

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.06.2017 um 16:56 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: since DNS don't care about the PTR but mail does what is your problem that you need stupid dicussions instead just agree that it can't do harm and in doubt is beneficial to have just one hostname, use that one hostname in helo_name and

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am 19.06.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: those rejections were NOT caused by having two different PTRs. They were caused by something different that is not a subject of this thread - even one PTR of this format would cause rejections. On 19.06.17 15:32, Reindl Harald wrote: not

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.06.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: * smtp_helo_name of your MTA matches the same name this one is incorrect and my next comment applies only to this one: On 19.06.17 15:14, Reindl Harald wrote: does it harm? NO is it easy to achive? YES can it be used for scoring on a

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
* smtp_helo_name of your MTA matches the same name this one is incorrect and my next comment applies only to this one: On 19.06.17 15:14, Reindl Harald wrote: does it harm? NO is it easy to achive? YES can it be used for scoring on a spamfilter? YES is it required? NO. Actually, this

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.06.2017 um 15:00 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 19.06.17 01:05, Reindl Harald wrote: it's nearly always misleading and results in randomness on the receiving server which name get logged and if A/PTR matches normally you should always have: * IP with *one* PTR * the A-Record for

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.06.17 01:05, Reindl Harald wrote: it's nearly always misleading and results in randomness on the receiving server which name get logged and if A/PTR matches normally you should always have: * IP with *one* PTR * the A-Record for the PTR matches these two are correct. *

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >>* IP with *one* PTR >>* the A-Record for the PTR matches >>* smtp_helo_name of your MTA matches the same name > >Even this is not required. In fact, requiring this breaks SMTP RFC. >The only requirement on helo name is

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.06.2017 um 08:49 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 18.06.17 16:26, Mark Elkins wrote: Put two reverse records in both the IPv4 and IPv6 reverse zones in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. 126 IN PTR ns.xxx.com. Am 18.06.2017 um 17:38

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Pierre Couderc
On 06/19/2017 10:42 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: If I do what you say reverse IP for DNS will point on mail.xxx.com and not on ns.xxx.com. I have asked you twice: WHO TOLD YOU THIS IS A PROBLEM? IT IS NOT! There are only a few services on the net who currently use reverse DNS

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Pierre Couderc
On 06/19/2017 10:27 AM, Mark Elkins wrote: Another solution could be to make one of the names a CNAME pointing to the other name. -or- Just use one generic name for both services. rather than the two "service" names. Although in all honesty, I see nothing wrong with a lookup returning two

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.06.17 10:27, Mark Elkins wrote: Another solution could be to make one of the names a CNAME pointing to the other name. No. This would create a real problem, since NS and mail have different records. -or- Just use one generic name for both services. rather than the two "service"

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 06/19/2017 08:51 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: long story short: in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. quoting your original message: What should I put for IPV4 reverse address : if I put mail.xxx.com, the reverse address will not point on

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Mark Elkins
Another solution could be to make one of the names a CNAME pointing to the other name. -or- Just use one generic name for both services. rather than the two "service" names. Although in all honesty, I see nothing wrong with a lookup returning two answers (in a single response packet) for the

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Pierre Couderc
On 06/19/2017 08:51 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 19.06.17 08:03, Pierre Couderc wrote: Ok, thank you all, now I need to understand your answers... long story short: in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. quoting your original message: What should

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Pierre Couderc
On 06/19/2017 01:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.06.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 18.06.17 16:26, Mark Elkins wrote: Put two reverse records in both the IPv4 and IPv6 reverse zones in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. 126 IN

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.06.17 08:03, Pierre Couderc wrote: Ok, thank you all, now I need to understand your answers... long story short: in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. quoting your original message: What should I put for IPV4 reverse address : if I put mail.xxx.com,

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 18.06.17 16:26, Mark Elkins wrote: Put two reverse records in both the IPv4 and IPv6 reverse zones in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. 126 IN PTR ns.xxx.com. Am 18.06.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: there are cases when having

Re: reverse dns configuration for IPV4, IPV6+ dns+ mail ?

2017-06-19 Thread Pierre Couderc
On 06/19/2017 01:05 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.06.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 18.06.17 16:26, Mark Elkins wrote: Put two reverse records in both the IPv4 and IPv6 reverse zones in the "125.124.123.in-addr.arpa" zone: 126 IN PTR mail.xxx.com. 126 IN