Re: Converting between zone file formats

2023-01-30 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
Hi, I think you can achieve the same effect with dig, but it requires some preparations. First, enable zone transfers for your slave zone from 127.0.0.1: add allow-transfer {127.0.0.1;}; to your slave zone definition (or add 127.0.0.1 there if you already have allow-transfer). Then you can

Re: Question About Recursion In A Split Horizon Setup

2020-04-17 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
the SERVER line indicate it's trying to get to the local instance via IPV6 or is this just standard notation? (This is an IPV4 only environment). -- Konstantin Stefanov ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe

Re: named.conf Default Location?

2016-01-13 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
ier versions? Try man -a named.conf and see if there are other vresions of man page. By default bind99 port uses /usr/local/etc/namedb, but it used to have REPLACE_BASE option, which instructed it to use /etc/namedb, so you may check it. -- Konstantin Stefanov, Research Computing Center M.V Lomonosov Mo

Re: Identify source of rndc reconfig command?

2015-08-26 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
commands? It's really annoying as it messes up the log with 350 useless lines every 30 minutes. Thanks! Robert -- Konstantin Stefanov, Research Computing Center M.V Lomonosov Moscow State University ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-19 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
On 18.03.2015 20:10, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:11:56PM +0300, Konstantin Stefanov wrote: On 18.03.2015 17:41, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:48:40AM +0300, Constantin Stefanov wrote: I see why it may lead to problems. But in fact the configuration with only

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
... On 18.03.15 13:10, Konstantin Stefanov wrote: So now I have to have two definitions for every slave zone in different files. Well, it is the thing I did, but I do not like it. Requirement to have 2 synced definitions in 2 different places leads to bugs. and what did you have before

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
definitions... So now I have to have two definitions for every slave zone in different files. Well, it is the thing I did, but I do not like it. Requirement to have 2 synced definitions in 2 different places leads to bugs. the only other way is stop using views... -- Konstantin Stefanov

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
simply copying does not work, otherwise 'include' would work fine. -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Stefanov Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:31 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Single

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
On 18.03.2015 16:55, Steven Carr wrote: On 18 March 2015 at 13:30, Konstantin Stefanov cs...@parallel.ru wrote: It isn't. But maintaining one file is easier. And having to maintain two after five years everything worked fine with one is annoying. This highlights the need for a test

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
options, if you look at my message Matus UHLAR (and the second suggestion was in my message which started the thread). But I do not have needed skills to implement it myself. -- Konstantin Stefanov, Research Computing Center M.V Lomonosov Moscow State University

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
On 18.03.2015 17:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: rOn 18.03.15 17:10, Konstantin Stefanov wrote: The issue is that named started to detect it since, if I'm not mistaken, 9.7. It happened because such config was leading to bugs, but instead of fixing the bugs, the whole feature was prohibited

Re: Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

2015-03-18 Thread Konstantin Stefanov
On 18.03.2015 18:37, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.03.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Konstantin Stefanov: I wrote earlier and may repeat again. The feature for me is not using the same file, the feature is having a clear and maitainable config. In this case it means to have only one description