If you are crawling lots of new names, the cache size won't have much
impact. Each new query will require recursing vs hitting the cache. Try
"rndc recursing" and look at what you have sitting around waiting for
answers. Hopefully that provides some clues. This can be all sorts of
things like
Do you really want to return RFC1918 to the Internet? Not the end of the
world, but some consider it unnecessary information disclosure. :-)
I've seen this on various WAN/fw/router used at home over the years (arris,
cisco, linksys, etc) and unlike the commands Reindal shared which are geared
Yes you can run without the chroot. Years ago it was considered best practice
to chroot and most power users would have said you were insane not to do so.
Now there are increasingly many who say it's not worth the effort (fairly easy
to get around in many cases) -- do a bit of google
On 1/13/16, 10:28 AM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
>Am 13.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Lightner, Jeff:
>> We chose to do BIND on physical for our externally authoritative
>>servers.
>>
On 1/13/16, 4:02 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Reindl
Harald" <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
>Am 13.01.2016 um 19:54 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
>> I've ran several large DNS infras over the
On 11/18/15, 10:47 AM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
Barry Margolin" wrote:
>In article ,
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> when a
On 11/18/15, 1:19 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Carl
Byington" wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:47 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> While that's the
On 9/4/15, 1:12 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
/dev/rob0"
wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:02:23PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 03.09.2015 um 22:59 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> >On 09/03/2015 04:35 PM,
On 9/4/15, 9:29 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Noel
Butler" wrote:
>On 05/09/2015 04:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> mostly people who are throwing as much as possible appliances and
>> firewalls in front of
Few points for clarification:
With rhel/centos you're not getting the major version as reported. You
need to look at the changlog for the package to see what fixes/features
have been backported. That effort including associated QA is part of what
you're paying for with rhel or getting for free
On 6/19/15, 4:07 PM, bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
/dev/rob0 bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of r...@gmx.co.uk
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 02:55:23PM -0500, I wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:11:16PM +,
Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
snip
Note
On 6/19/15, 1:16 PM, bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Reindl
Harald bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.06.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
I suppose the only way to avoid any intermediate firewalls would be to
place
On 6/18/15, 7:09 PM, Stuart Browne stuart.bro...@bomboratech.com.au
wrote:
Just wondering. You mention you're using RHEL6; are you also getting
messages in 'dmesg' about connection tracking tables being full? You may
need some 'NOTRACK' rules in your iptables.
Just following along, for the
Inline...
On 6/18/15, 9:22 AM, Cathy Almond cat...@isc.org wrote:
On 18/06/2015 12:00, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 17.06.15 22:39, Shawn Zhou wrote:
BIND on my resolvers reaches the max open file limit and I am getting
lots
of SERVFAILs
http://pastebin.com/SxRsHLff
After I
I'm not sure if BIND has a separate tunable for the timeout vs true
negative answer scenario you seem to describe, but have you tried setting
max-ncache-ttl very low to see if it affects this?
On 6/11/15, 9:27 AM, Gerd v. Egidy li...@egidy.de wrote:
Hi,
I've got a bind running as recursive
Hi folks,
I've read about RRL with interest since its inception, but just now
getting around to rolling it out. That is partially because we run a very
small authoritative infrastructure serving mostly as Akamai EDNS origins.
However, since it is exposed externally, used by a few tenants and RRL
FWIW as another data point we've seen the same in the wild across
RHEL/CentOS 5.x and 6.x on large (32 core) Xeon based servers
(E5-2650's), including 6.6 with the 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 kernel.
Observed while debugging other things, and haven't had time to follow up.
-Original
Another option might be changing 'file' to 'syslog' then using stuff like
:msg, contains, 'skipping nameserver' stop (or whatever pattern you want
to match) in your rsyslog configuration.
http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/rsyslog_conf_filter.html
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
The answer is BIND does accept TCP queries by default (it's required to be
RFC compliant), but a lot of times upstream firewalls/ACLs/etc block TCP,
munge UDP packet size, etc... Just firing up BIND with basic
configuration and checking netstat will show you TCP 53 listening. If
it's not working
-Original Message-
From: John j...@klam.ca
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:29 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: SRV records etc
How useful are SRV records? Are they worth installing? What are their
benefits, and pitfalls?
Similar question about HINFO.
The other thing is, you mention having tried and failed (agreed that isn't a
bad thing, we've all failed countless times and it's how we learn)...how have
you failed?
What I think you'll find is you have a list (many lists and other resources
really) of mentors. BIND much like many other
Thanks for digging in so fast. Our mitigation will be sticking to
9.9.6-P1, since we like ESV anyway.
Wanted to point out that (perhaps sadly) this isn't so crazypants...or at
least not uncommon. The *edge* and *aka* references speak Akamai DNS+CDN.
From my last overview, this has gotten
For what little it's worth, I've seen this somewhat even on 9.8 (it's not new),
though increasingly on 9.9...not saying it's BIND specific, just that I've hit
these kind of annoyances with remote servers awhile now.
I've tried explaining this on numerous internal email threads, tickets, webex
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sparro dspa...@gmail.com
Date: Friday, October 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Diagnostic help part 2
On 10/1/2014 3:45 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
(Sorry for straying off topic. I have less experience of Cisco
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Diagnostic help part 2
On 10/1/14 8:17 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com
Date: Friday, September 12, 2014 at 11:47 AM
To: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
Mike Hoskins wrote:
Do you guys have max-cache-size set? I didn't see it in the
borderworlds
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Date: Friday, September 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com, Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com,
bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?
On 9/12/14 11:07 AM, Mike Hoskins
Do you guys have max-cache-size set? I didn't see it in the borderworlds
named.conf. I've seen similar growth problems when testing 9.x before
setting that (experiment at the time just to see what would happen, and
confirmed this behavior). Set sensible resource limits based on available
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Friday, August 8, 2014 at 6:33 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Logs problem with Bind 9.9.4
so if you have nothing to say go back from
-Original Message-
From: Evan Hunt e...@isc.org
Date: Monday, August 4, 2014 at 1:26 PM
To: John Anderson jo...@ccbill.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Metazones or Something Else?
So to the best of your knowledge this functionality is still on
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch d...@dotat.at
Date: Friday, August 1, 2014 at 5:31 AM
To: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: rndc (and now nsupdate too)
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 31.07.2014 um
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Friday, August 1, 2014 at 9:23 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: rndc (and now nsupdate too)
Am 01.08.2014 um 15:14 schrieb Mike Hoskins
I haven't used those, but not sure if smokeping's DNS plugin would do what
you want.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Greene bgre...@senki.org
Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 at 11:59 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Tools to automatically test the resolution
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 6:24 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: initial lookup fails every time
On 12.07.14 01:19, Tony Publiski wrote:
I'm hoping someone has seen this before. I'm
-Original Message-
From: Asai a...@globalchangemusic.org
Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 12:56 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Caching Nameserver and BIND RPM Compatibility
Greetings,
We're setting up caching-nameserver on an existing BIND instance. The
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 8:41 PM
To: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Caching Nameserver and BIND RPM Compatibility
Not every *important* fix is a *security* fix.
OS
-Original Message-
From: Samad Agha samad.agha2...@gmail.com
Date: Friday, June 27, 2014 at 1:07 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org, DNS BIND
bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: In BIND 8.2 running on Solaris 8, how to start logging
Hi All,
I have two Solaris 8 servers
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas F Miller nicholas.mil...@colorado.edu
Date: Thursday, June 5, 2014 at 10:25 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: SPF RR type
Are SPF RR types finally dead or not? I¹ve read through rfc7208 it
appears that they are:
SPF
Cisco (apply liberal amounts of salt considering my FROM) has a product
suite called Prime, one piece of which is CNR (unless it's been renamed
again this week) -- Cisco Network Registrar, which handles the IPAM piece
and has DHCP and DNS components as well. CNR can integrate with BIND (as
well
In the past when doing this with Cisco GSS I followed Akamai's example,
and had success with stuff like (gdns* were the CSS):
; delegation of gslb.domain.com
$TTL 172800 ; 2 days
gdns1.domain.com. A a.b.c.d
gdns2.domain.com. A e.f.g.h
gdns3.domain.com. A i.j.k.l
Hi Jason,
I've experienced similar things in the past on 9.8. Since then we've
moved to the latest 9.9, but don't think this is at all version specific
(that said, you could obviously try upgrading). I don't have an exact
solution for you, but some ideas of things to check and personal
From: BONNET, Frank frank.bon...@esiee.fr
Date: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Difference between BIND 9.8 and 9.9
Hello
is there a link to a documentation that lists the main differences
between BIND 9.8 and 9.9 ?
I
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
I just remembered there was also the change to the db file
having a default raw format on
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:25 PM
To: 'Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.' lkc...@ksu.edu,
bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Thanks for that. I just remembered there was
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernhardt bernha...@bart.gov
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4
Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this:
And if it is indeed enabled regardless
Good call out. I'd always enabled empty-zones so didn't get bit by that,
but do think the move to 9.9 is when masterfile-format bit some. Not a
big deal if you're aware of it.Other than that the upgrade as quick
and painless. I would suggest testing the upgrade on a VM or somewhere
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
Date: Friday, December 20, 2013 12:15 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Adding DS records
On Dec 20, 2013, at 10:38 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04:59AM -0500,
-Original Message-
From: Bob McDonald bmcdonal...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 7:10 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Delegation and Forwarding
I'm a bit confused on the need for a blank forwarders statement inside of
a zone statement in the
-Original Message-
From: Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:03 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: RHEL 6 CPU load
Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible
- 95.4% idle).
Wondering the same.
-Original Message-
From: Listas lis...@adminlinux.com.br
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:57 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Size boundaries for zones of IPv6 rDNS
Hi!
Are there size limits for zones of IPv6 reverse DNS ?
For example, is this a
-Original Message-
From: Birta Levente blevi.li...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:29 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: logging query time
Hi
I have a caching nameserver (bind 9.8.2) and I curious if I can log the
duration of queries to the
Hi folks,
Quick question on xml stats... I've used the new style statistics for
monitoring, etc. and find it really useful as I'm sure many do. One of
the things I'm working on is moving to collectd vs remote polling, and the
bind plugin seems to require v2 vs v3 xml schema (my first guess,
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com
Date: Saturday, November 2, 2013 1:31 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: xml stats question
Hi folks,
Quick question on xml stats... I've used the new style statistics for
monitoring, etc. and find
-Original Message-
From: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 7:44 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind
On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:47 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
From: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Fix
While I mostly agree, simply doing a 'yum update' against the CentOS repos
will pull you up to 5.9...which isn't really old, it was released around
the same time as 6.4. Then at least your base OS is up to date, and you
don't have to use the community RPMs. You can build from source, generate
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. lkc...@ksu.edu
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 10:08 AM
To: bind-users bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: filter--on-v4
I finally turned this feature on when I built bind-9.9.3-P2
Had only gotten the occasional user complaints
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch d...@dotat.at
Date: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 4:50 AM
To: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: detect if zone/s is frozen
Mike Hoskins (michoski) micho...@cisco.com wrote:
/dev/rob0 r
-Original Message-
From: /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk
Organization: RTFM
Reply-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 5:17 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: detect if zone/s is frozen
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at
-Original Message-
From: Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 5:35 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: the location of dig and named
when I typed dig or named ,,, what is the location of the executable
program dig and named is
-Original Message-
From: Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com
Date: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:02 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: /etc/named.conf won't be installed !!
hi
when I install BIND,,,BIND won't install the /etc/named.conf file why ???
I think
-Original Message-
From: Nidal Shater ngiw2...@hotmail.com
Date: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:27 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: The Path of source code
I have installed BIND by using the command yum install bind in
centos6.3,what is the location(path)
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Bakhtiar shashan...@hotmail.com
Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 12:15 PM
To: bind-us...@isc.org bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: RE: configure syslog prefix
hhhmmm
I have not run multiple binds on the same box, but according to the man
pages for named.conf
-Original Message-
From: Novosielski, Ryan novos...@ca.rutgers.edu
Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 12:38 PM
To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND Service Hung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org
Date: Friday, June 28, 2013 11:43 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout
I have a recent build of BIND 9.9.3-P1 and after bringing up the service
on a
i'm probably the last to notice, but first...good work on the site
redesign. nice and clean.
generating a new internal package for 9.9.3, and going through the
site/request form i get directed here:
http://www.isc.org/wp-content/plugins/email-before-download/download.php?dl
fwd to spare the list further responses :-)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com
Date: Monday, June 24, 2013 4:59 PM
To: sgra...@isc.org sgra...@isc.org
Subject: Re: 9.9.3-P2
-Original Message-
From: Sue Graves sgra...@isc.org
Organization: Internet Systems
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. lkc...@ksu.edu
Date: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:55 PM
To: Gaurav Kansal gaurav.kan...@nic.in
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Health Check feature in BIND ?
- Original Message -
Dear All,
I was
-Original Message-
From: Elmar K. Bins e...@4ever.de
Organization: unorganized since 1789
Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 6:18 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: This list's prefix
s...@resistor.net (SM) wrote:
And the 100-dollar-question is: How do you
-Original Message-
From: Narcis Garcia informat...@actiu.net
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 12:43 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: This list's prefix
It's not the only mailing list where I'm subscribed.
Could please the administrator setup a prefix for
-Original Message-
From: Narcis Garcia informat...@actiu.net
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:02 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: This list's prefix
Somebody has answered me privately and didn't realized until I've
checked all details of each message.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:46 PM
To: Narcis Garcia informat...@actiu.net
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: This list's prefix
--
Curse the dark, or light a match. You decide, it's your dark.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch d...@dotat.at
Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 11:01 AM
To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: architecture question
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 09.05.13 10:21,
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy P jpcra...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 1:33 PM
To: Steven Carr sjc...@gmail.com
Cc: bind-users bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: architecture question
I understand letter of the law, spirit of the law and playing it safe to
avoid headaches.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Reed cronst...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 4:38 PM
To: Jeremy P jpcra...@gmail.com
Cc: bind-users bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: architecture question
It would be a waste of money as their systems never leave the local
network, except
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Date: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:34 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: New BIND versions are available.
Michael,
Thanks for this announcement, and a welcome change.
Given the
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk
Date: Friday, April 5, 2013 3:10 PM
To: Bind Users Mailing List bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Simple question about zone and CNAME
On Apr 5 2013, John Wobus wrote:
DNAME? runs away, gigglingŠ
Or SRV records. Surely
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
Date: Monday, April 1, 2013 2:46 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)
On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Bakhtiar shashan...@hotmail.com
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013 12:06 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Registrar that supports self-run domains and provides
DNSSEC support
2) We don't buy or maintain street addresses
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:53 PM
To: Vernon Schryver v...@rhyolite.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: allow-query and views
Whow... This is news. A hidden view? Where is this
-Original Message-
From: Sowmya Manjanatha sowmy...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:11 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND master , Windows 2008 stub zone not transferring
Well, I have a stub zone on Windows 2008 server set-up to use
-Original Message-
From: Jsilliman jsilli...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:57 PM
To: Alan Clegg a...@clegg.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Cannot create A record issue
Ubuntu does not use that:
root@:/etc/bind# cat
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:57 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: BIND9 statistics-server: JSON?
As a fan of BIND's statistics-server I was tempted to see if I could
reduce the size of the
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
Date: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:33 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Randoming ports and firewall rules
So it is past time for me to only use port 53 and support port
randomization. But I do
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:53 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: chroot/etc/named/ directory?
I am upgrading my server from bind-9.3.6 via Centos 5.5 to 9.8.2 in
Centos 6.3.
I have
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: chroot/etc/named/ directory?
Having said all that, you might search the
Note: Removing cross-post, but feel free to forward.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Urbanik nick.urba...@optusnet.com.au
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:00 PM
To: keepalived-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
keepalived-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, bind-users@lists.isc.org
-Original Message-
From: Timothe Litt l...@acm.org
Date: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:13 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9.9.3b1 is now available
On 25-Jan-13 17:32, Michael McNally wrote:
BIND 9.9.3b1 is the first beta release of BIND 9.9.3.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Batie a...@peak.org
Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:52 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: what do you use for logging?
On 1/17/13 10:48 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
By the way, all of the BIND10 logging
messages are
-Original Message-
From: Vernon Schryver v...@rhyolite.com
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:05 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: MNAME not a listed NS record
From: Dave Warren li...@hireahit.com
Various online DNS diagnostic tools throw warnings,
-Original Message-
From: Daniele d.imbrog...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 9:17 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Name resolution fails if not forwarding
This is the scenario.
I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU
-Original Message-
From: Gaurav Kansal gaurav.kan...@nic.in
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 12:34 AM
To: Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk, bind-users@lists.isc.org
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet
Thanks for help.
My Firewall was dropping packet size
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 4:35 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: gitnamed, a project to manage name server by git
GitNamed is a project that manage name server by git. you can clone
the
-Original Message-
From: Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013 9:44 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Distribute named.conf
On 03/01/13 14:36, Warren Kumari wrote:
Yup, have a look at Puppet.
For the first while it
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Wright jwri...@isc.org
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013 8:41 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: open-source tool for filter out stats from dns logs
There might be some tools already out there (like Splunk) that do this
for
-Original Message-
From: wbr...@e1b.org wbr...@e1b.org
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:29 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Distribute named.conf
How does Puppet compare to Ansible? http://ansible.cc/
Thanks for sharing, first I'd heard of it...
-Original Message-
From: wbr...@e1b.org wbr...@e1b.org
Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013 3:15 PM
To: Mike Hoskins micho...@cisco.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org,
bind-users-bounces+wbrown=e1b@lists.isc.org
bind-users-bounces+wbrown=e1b@lists.isc.org
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy C. Reed jr...@isc.org
Date: Friday, November 30, 2012 4:18 PM
To: Adamiec, Lawrence ladam...@kentlaw.iit.edu
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: another performance tuning question
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Adamiec, Lawrence
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 12:28 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: truncated responses vs. minimal-responses?
Hello,
last few weeks I have seen many discussions over UDP truncating
98 matches
Mail list logo