Re: ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license

2016-06-14 Thread pgndev
> If that doesn't explain it, then you are just looking to > argue license religion and justify a choice you already made, Or, we're just left scratching our heads wondering what the ranting is about. Seems like there are lots on this list who practice no such religion, and actually find this

specifics of downgrading from rpz2 (3rd party patch) - rpz1 (in Bind release) ?

2014-01-13 Thread pgndev
We'd deployed named v9.9.4 with the patches from BIND9 RRL and RPZ Patches http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html ... Multiple Zone Response Policy Zone (RPZ2) Speed Improvement with Response Rate Limiting (RRL) BIND9 9.9.4 file rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch, version

Re: specifics of downgrading from rpz2 (3rd party patch) - rpz1 (in Bind release) ?

2014-01-13 Thread pgndev
IIRC there's no syntax/feature difference. Quickly attempting to use the existing, same named config that I've been using with 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14 with a new build of 9.9.4-P2 release, 9.9.4-P2 refuses to boot. I've not (yet) gotten any farther than that ... ... shouldn't be tough to figure

Re: specifics of downgrading from rpz2 (3rd party patch) - rpz1 (in Bind release) ?

2014-01-13 Thread pgndev
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: Why does the *need* to be info as the existing patches works other than for the version file which for the fix by hand is pretty obvious or you can just leave it as it is in 9.9.4-P2. The patch devs have been silent on their

Re: specifics of downgrading from rpz2 (3rd party patch) - rpz1 (in Bind release) ?

2014-01-13 Thread pgndev
You appear to want people to supply you with a new patch Oh, THAT's what I wanted? Thanks SO much for clearing that up! ... and unless you are paying Vernon to support you he is under no obligation to respond to you. ... You can keep bloviating, but it still doesn't mean you have the

Re: Adding DS records

2013-12-20 Thread pgndev
Any recomendations for another company for a .com domain in the US Gandi.net Great support, including DNSSEC: http://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/dnssec http://doc.rpc.gandi.net/domain/reference.html On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Thomas Schulz sch...@adi.com wrote: If I was a NetSol

upgrade from v9.9.3-rpz2+rl - v9.9.4-rpz2+rl introduces fatal launch error: initializing DST: no engine

2013-09-27 Thread pgndev
I currently run, named -V BIND 9.9.3-rpz2+rl.13204.02-P2 (Extended Support Version) id:d8a6fe8b built with '--prefix=/usr/local/bind-9.9.3-P2' '--libdir=/usr/local/bind-9.9.3-P2/lib64' '--sysconfdir=/usr/local/etc/named' '--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-shared' '--disable-static'

Re: upgrade from v9.9.3-rpz2+rl - v9.9.4-rpz2+rl introduces fatal launch error: initializing DST: no engine

2013-09-27 Thread pgndev
PEBKAC. Found this, http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.dns.bind.user/49569 suggesting not an issue with libgost, but libpkcs11.so Took a closer look at the config, found ... --without-pkcs11 \ ... --with-pkcs11 ... Errant copy -n- paste! rm'ing --with-pkcs11 then