Funny email address.
I could be wrong, but it looks like you might have a firewall problem. The one
really slow response is the one over 512 bytes. Is it possible you have a
firewall that examines the contents of DNS messages?
Regards,
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:34
your traffic by getting a pcap via tcpdump and then analyzi=
> ng it in wireshark. Packets don't lie.
>
> John
>
> Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/>
>
> From: Pol Hallen <bin...@fuckaround.org>
> Sent: Sep 21, 2016 2:35 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Pol,
You can "audit" your traffic by getting a pcap via tcpdump and then analyzing
it in wireshark. Packets don't lie.
John
Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/>
From: Pol Hallen <bin...@fuckaround.org>
Sent: Sep 21, 2016 2:35 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subje
hello again!
try running dig +trace and see how fast it runs. It should return
in about same time as BIND does (when it doesn't have anything in cache).
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> +trace @192.168.1.212 yahoo.it
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
. 518367
so simply leave BIND running and see if it's better tomorrow...
On 21.09.16 09:29, Pol Hallen wrote:
seems better today, but how I realize if bind runs correclty? I mean:
if the speed of it is normal or if there are lags?
try running dig +trace and see how fast it runs. It should return
in
so simply leave BIND running and see if it's better tomorrow...
hello,
seems better today, but how I realize if bind runs correclty? I mean: if
the speed of it is normal or if there are lags?
Now I tested some domains, almost all are ok but 2 of these are slow...
using @8.8.8.8 with these
with 9.10, leave prefetch on and see...
On 20.09.16 15:12, Pol Hallen wrote:
I've 9.9.5 version on debian stable :-/
so simply leave BIND running and see if it's better tomorrow...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail
just leave bind running for some time.
:-)
with 9.10, leave prefetch on and see...
I've 9.9.5 version on debian stable :-/
thanks
Pol
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
Am 20.09.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Pol Hallen:
what happend if you leave it working (without forwarders) for some time?
BIND should cache frequently used data and provide them quickly.
I don't know. I start now testing without forwarders and tonight I see
when you use google forwarder, the
On 20.09.16 15:03, Pol Hallen wrote:
what happend if you leave it working (without forwarders) for some time?
BIND should cache frequently used data and provide them quickly.
I don't know. I start now testing without forwarders and tonight I see
when you use google forwarder, the main
what happend if you leave it working (without forwarders) for some time?
BIND should cache frequently used data and provide them quickly.
I don't know. I start now testing without forwarders and tonight I see
when you use google forwarder, the main difference is that most of those
data are
Am 20.09.2016 um 12:29 schrieb Pol Hallen:
without forwarder, using dig command, "query time" only on some domains
(I tested italian domains - I live in Italy) is 350-800ms, with
forwarder almost always is less 100ms (!)
I'd like have my BIND (no forwarder) that works for my lan :-)
which
On 20.09.16 12:29, Pol Hallen wrote:
I've a quad core 2.4Ghz with standard italian DSL
I tested BIND with either forwarder activated and disactivated
forwarders {
8.8.8.8; 8.8.4.4;
};
without forwarder, using dig command, "query time" only on some
domains (I tested
Hi all :-)
I've a quad core 2.4Ghz with standard italian DSL
I tested BIND with either forwarder activated and disactivated
forwarders {
8.8.8.8; 8.8.4.4;
};
without forwarder, using dig command, "query time" only on some domains
(I tested italian domains - I
14 matches
Mail list logo
