*Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com*
Sent by: kob6...@gmail.com
10/03/2013 12:47 PM
To
Balanagaraju Munukutla/Singapore/ATT/IDE@IBMSG
cc
bind-users bind-us...@isc.org, Subramaniam Raju subrr...@in.ibm.com
Subject
Re: Dig gives ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Balanagaraju Munukutla 9ba...@sg.ibm.comwrote:
Hi All
To explain more on the below. We are trying to do a query on MX record for
abcd.com.sg. domain to the Authoritative nameserver .com from my pc.
You can see the reply as below. Done this mean that the
-16.P1.el5 @x.com abcd.com.sg mx
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[andrew@oc8163211842 ~]$ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 @x.com abcd.com.sg mx
; (1 server found
Hi
Any one could help on the error below.
[andrew@oc8163211842 ~] $ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 @x.com abcd.com.sg mx
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[andrew@oc8163211842
be reached
Looks like the connection is timing out to me. Maybe no servers could be
reached.
Check the logs on the server (x.com).
Note that it times out for me as well:
SNIP
aclegg@ossatura ~ $ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
; DiG 9.9.4 @.com abcd.com.sg mx
; (1 server
: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Yes, it means the nameserver at .com could not be reached.
FYI, that version of dig (and presumably BIND) was deprecated back in 2009:
https://www.isc.org/downloads/software-support-policy/bind-software-status/
Regards,
--
-Chuck
: printcmd
;;* connection timed out; no servers could be reached*
[andrew@oc8163211842 ~]$ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 @x.com abcd.com.sg mx
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; *connection timed out; no servers could be reached
...@in.ibm.com
Subject
Re: Dig gives ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Balanagaraju Munukutla 9ba...@sg.ibm.com
wrote:
Hi
Any one could help on the error below.
[andrew@oc8163211842 ~] $ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
; DiG 9.3.6-P1
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 7/28/11 3:16 AM, uifid...@gmail.com uifid...@gmail.com wrote:
my czj.zone
$TTL 86400
czj. IN SOA localhost. root.localhost. (
1997022700 ; Serial
On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:27 AM, uifid...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to config a bind server which could answering queries (at
least from 127.0.0.1 and 192.168.18.128) like dig kia.czj but I
failed to. perhaps my ignorance about match-clients and
match-destinations statements failed my attempt,
still get no servers could be reached, need help.
#dig @127.0.0.1 nsc1.domainx
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 @127.0.0.1 nsc1.domainx.
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
cat /etc/resolv.conf
; generated by /sbin/dhclient
#hostname
CentOS3
Is it matter?
2011/7/29 uifid...@gmail.com uifid...@gmail.com:
still get no servers could be reached, need help.
#dig @127.0.0.1 nsc1.domainx
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 @127.0.0.1 nsc1.domainx.
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection
dig kia.czj
; DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 kia.czj
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
my ip is 192.168.18.128
my named.conf
options {
listen-on port 53 { 192.168.18.128; 127.0.0.1; };
listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1
On 7/28/11 3:16 AM, uifid...@gmail.com uifid...@gmail.com wrote:
my czj.zone
$TTL 86400
czj. IN SOA localhost. root.localhost. (
1997022700 ; Serial
28800 ; Refresh
On 7/28/2011 4:16 AM, uifid...@gmail.com wrote:
view localhost_resolver {
match-clients { localhost; };
match-destinations { localhost; };
recursion yes;
include /etc/named.rfc1912.zones;
};
view czj {
match-clients { 192.168.18.128; localhost; };
I'm trying to config a bind server which could answering queries (at
least from 127.0.0.1 and 192.168.18.128) like dig kia.czj but I
failed to. perhaps my ignorance about match-clients and
match-destinations statements failed my attempt, or more likely, SOA
and NS of localhost. seems wrong. It
:~ $ mv /etc/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf.moved
Chickamin-River:~ $ dig www.isc.org
; DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 www.isc.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: no servers could be reached
On 7/28/11 12:16 AM, uifid...@gmail.com wrote:
my /etc/resolve.conf
Note: ^^^
named-checkzone named-checkconf passed, I suppose the configure works
but only get no servers could be reached.What's wrong with my config?
Your
: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
unsubscribe from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
www.yahoo.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
both boxes sit on the same subnet, and they both have the same hints
file. no fw(pf) installed on any of the boxes.
if it's a straight forward query for box#2 it calls out
found what the problem is, i stop bind completely and re-run it again
and the hintlist worked again. bug? maybe I'm running OpenBSD 4.2 and
it's built-in bind server.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:03:14 -0500, R Dicaire faxed us with
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
I have to admit that I am a bit baffled by this one. =A0I can query
against my bandwidth providers name servers (Comcast) and get name
resolution just fine for
www.malware.com.br
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
A tshark packet capture sees this:
1 3.362200 10.20.30.25 - 192.228.79.201 DNS Standard query A
www.malware.com.br
2 3.405447 192.228.79.201 - 10.20.30.25 DNS Standard query response
3 3.406198
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
I have to admit that I am a bit baffled by this one. I can query
against my bandwidth providers name servers (Comcast) and get name
resolution just fine for the hostname www.malware.com.br:
Check firewall settings. Connection
24 matches
Mail list logo
