> You appear to want people to supply you with a new patch
Oh, THAT's what I wanted? Thanks SO much for clearing that up!
> ... and unless you are paying Vernon to support you he is under no obligation
> to respond
to you. ...
You can keep bloviating, but it still doesn't mean you have the
sli
In message
, pgndev writes:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Why does the *need* to be info as the existing patches works other
> > than for the version file which for the fix by hand is pretty
> > obvious or you can just leave it as it is in 9.9.4-P2.
>
> The patch de
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Why does the *need* to be info as the existing patches works other
> than for the version file which for the fix by hand is pretty
> obvious or you can just leave it as it is in 9.9.4-P2.
The patch devs have been silent on their site, and on
> IIRC there's no syntax/feature difference.
Quickly attempting to use the existing, same named config that I've
been using with 9.9.4-rpz2+rl.13269.14 with a new build of 9.9.4-P2
release, 9.9.4-P2 refuses to boot. I've not (yet) gotten any farther
than that ...
... shouldn't be tough to figure
On 13/01/2014 17:27, pgndev wrote:
Can anyone clarify specifically the *diff* between rpz1, as in the
Bind9 release, and rpz2? Particularly, which specific
features/capabilities I need to unwind to get back to 'just' rpz1?
IIRC there's no syntax/feature difference. Rather, RPZ2 is a set of
(
We'd deployed named v9.9.4 with the patches from
BIND9 RRL and RPZ Patches
http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
...
Multiple Zone Response Policy Zone (RPZ2) Speed Improvement
with Response Rate Limiting (RRL)
BIND9 9.9.4
file rpz2+rl-9.9.4.patch, version
6 matches
Mail list logo
