Just read from the 9.18.0 release notes that Windows is not supported.
Since don't remember reading expressly stated that Windows support would
end with 9.16.x branch, inquiring if there is more information about
future Windows compatibility available... is the plan to include support
to
What changed between Bind 9.16.13 and 9.16.15 Windows x64 binaries?
9.16.15 will not start at all in Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64, 9.16.13 worked
fine.
Only get "The service is not responding to the control function" when trying to
start the service.
Tried this as an upgrade to the 9.16.13,
In their (mailgun) instructions to the client. And then the client wanted us
to include those to his zone.
CNAME of course is useful in general, but like I wrote, *here* it is not
needed.
Jukka
On 23.08.20 09:59, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>Yes, I think the whole CNAME is useless here any
CNAME you end up with a CNAME mx and TXT at the same
node in to the DNS tree and that is illegal. That is why you get the error
"cname and other data". The mx and txt are the other data.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 8:19 PM Jukka Pakkanen
mailto:jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi>> wrote:
Cannot
401 characters… so that’a another problem. Thx.
Lähettäjä: Kyongseon West
Lähetetty: 23. elokuuta 2020 3:16
Vastaanottaja: Jukka Pakkanen
Kopio: bind-us...@isc.org
Aihe: Re: CNAME / TXT
How long is the character in txt line? If it’s longer than 255, it will show
that exact error. Exact thing
Cannot figure out what is wrong here... must be something simple but after
sitting in airplanes the last 40 hours and it's 2am...
Only when I comment out the two lines in the end of the named.harriot, it goes
through and BIND load the zone. With those two lines, get the following:
Many spammers send in addition to MX to A records, if available. Still, it is
a good practice to not to publish an A record for the mail zone, if not
specifically needed for something else. Of course if it points to somewhere
else than the receiving SMTP server, not much harm done
Only CNAME is perfectly fine, except if you want the site work without the
www-prefix like someone already pointed out. Of course there must be A record
for that name where the cname points to somewhere, but I read the question that
this is not your concern.
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen
Yes but before going to RFC details one should check the basic spelling and
syntax first...
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Mark Andrews
Lähetetty: 18. kesäkuuta 2020 0:27
Vastaanottaja: Bogdan-Stefan Rotariu
Kopio: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Aihe: Re: A And
Including the trailing dots…
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 17. kesäkuuta 2020 23:51
Vastaanottaja: Ejaz Ahmed ; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Aihe: VS: A And Cname-record
Check at least the spelling…
Lähettäjä: bind-users
mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
Check at least the spelling…
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Ejaz Ahmed
Lähetetty: 17. kesäkuuta 2020 23:44
Vastaanottaja: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Aihe: A And Cname-record
when i am trying to add A and CNAME record together for the same subdomain,
getting an error as below, you all kind
remember using as a guideline to
set up our first domains/zones. And from that, the setting was copied later on
to all new domains too.
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Tony Finch
Lähetetty: 5. kesäkuuta 2020 16:09
Vastaanottaja: Jukka Pakkanen
Kopio: Ondřej Surý ; bi
Thx for the info, had missed this one and actually we have that minor
misconfiguration too. Have had since 1995 when started our nameservers and
never noticed...
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Ondřej Surý
Lähetetty: 5. kesäkuuta 2020 11:53
Vastaanottaja: Jukka Pakkanen
Kopio
Complete scam, ignore.
Just check the “securityfocus” link, it’s fake too.
Jukka
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Ejaz Ahmed
Lähetetty: 5. kesäkuuta 2020 10:55
Vastaanottaja: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Aihe: Fwd: DNS Misconfiguration on- http://cyberia.net.sa/
Some one is is claiming that our
I just did the same operation in our BIND servers, converted all DNSSEC enabled
zones with different algorithms to KASP/dnssec-policy and ecdsa256/13.
All I did was replaced the two lines in named.conf:
inline-signing yes;
auto-dnssec maintain;
to
dnssec-policy "ecdsa256";
And of
Thanks!
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Mark Andrews
Lähetetty: 16. huhtikuuta 2020 2:30
Vastaanottaja: Jukka Pakkanen
Kopio: bind-us...@isc.org
Aihe: Re: 9.16.2 / DNSSEC / DS records
> On 16 Apr 2020, at 09:21, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>
> Updating from 9.14.11
And yet, after updating Gemtrade.fi to dnssec-policy, ZSK and KSK both "13",
and updating the DS record at the .fi root, I still get:
(algorithm 13 not supportedsignature verification failed)
In Verisign DNSSEC verifier.
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 16.
Updating from 9.14.11 to 9.16.2, and migrating existing signed zones to
dnssec-policy, and have couple questions, probably quite trivial...
We have signed zones with different key algorithms, now I want everything under
the same ecdsa256 policy. I guess when the key algorithm changes, example
Hi, at the download page the status of 9.16 is “Current-Stable” but it also
states “only for testing & evalution, *not* recommended for production”?
Can you confirm if the DNSSEC inline-signing problem (signing just stops
sometimes, affects both 9.11 and 9.14 branch) is present in this or not?
Like reported earlier, this same behavior/problem occurs also in 9.14.x branch,
hopefully the fix will be found quickly, it is quite disturbing problem.
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Ondrej Surý
Lähetetty: 19. helmikuuta 2020 7:17
Vastaanottaja: Matthew
..except our problem is with the 9.14.9 version/branch.
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 5. helmikuuta 2020 23:52
Vastaanottaja: 'Matthew Richardson' ;
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Aihe: VS: Bind 9.11.13 - inline re-signing stops
Maybe related to your earlier
Maybe related to your earlier reported problem, when signed zonedata is not
updated after updates to the zone?
And what I already read about 9.11.15, hopefully fixed there.
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Matthew
Richardson
Lähetetty: 5. helmikuuta 2020
Same here
See also
https://serverfault.com/questions/897894/bind-is-not-resigning-dnssec-zone-after-zone-update-and-service-restart
Ale
On Thu 23/Jan/2020 09:57:02 +0100 Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> Yes, that worked. Also had to delete the .jnl, to prevent the "not exact"
> er
While sorting out this latest DNSSEC problem, autosign not autosigning, this
other older *cosmetic* problem would be nice to have fixed too...
Windows Event Viewer filling with these error messages, which I think are not
actual errors, should be more like warnings or notifications. When the
service is restarted, every signed zone gives this "error" message:
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 9. lokakuuta 2019 1:51
Vastaanottaja: bind-us...@isc.org
Aihe: DNSSEC 9.14.6 error message
Having these *error* messages in the syslog when restarting the service
Yes, that worked. Also had to delete the .jnl, to prevent the "not exact"
error..
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Mark Andrews
Lähetetty: 23. tammikuuta 2020 0:53
Vastaanottaja: Jukka Pakkanen
Kopio: bind-us...@isc.org; Browne, Stuart
Aihe: Re: DNSSEC zones n
i36>
From: Browne, Stuart
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 12:14:29 AM
To: Jukka Pakkanen ; bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: RE: DNSSEC zones not updated
Sadly, no ideas other than a shared experience. It's not just the Windows
release nor is it just the 9.14 series of releases; we've been witn
Anyone, any ideas?
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 22. tammikuuta 2020 13:30
Vastaanottaja: bind-us...@isc.org
Aihe: Re: DNSSEC zones not updated
And we also get after a change and a reload the "secure_serial: not exact"
error, of course because the s
dows 2019 server. And it is not only this domain/zone, but all of
them.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Ondřej Surý
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 1:08:22 PM
To: Jukka Pakkanen
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: DNSSEC zones not upd
ary 22, 2020 1:08:22 PM
To: Jukka Pakkanen
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: DNSSEC zones not updated
Hi,
did you try stopping BIND, removing journal files and then starting BIND again?
If the signed copy of the zone got corrupted in the memory, you might be
dumping the corrupted version on disk
12:56
To: Jukka Pakkanen
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: DNSSEC zones not updated
Just a basic question, are you querying the master or a slave. If a slave, it
could be the notify/transfer.
Thanks
Sten
On 22 Jan 2020, at 12.11, Jukka Pakkanen
mailto:jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi>> wrote:
Running BIND 9.14.9 Windows. The zone data is not updated for some reason
anymore, and same problem in all our signed zones. Example "gemtrade.fi":
zone "gemtrade.fi" {
type master;
file "named.gemtrade";
inline-signing yes;
auto-dnssec maintain;
};
;
;File:
-
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 9. lokakuuta 2019 16:36
Vastaanottaja: Tony Finch
Kopio: bind-us...@isc.org
Aihe: VS: DNSSEC 9.14.6 error message
Yes I can stop and restart the "isc bind" service without problems and/or
errors, only get this message in restart, i
t; in syslog.
Jukka
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Tony Finch
Lähetetty: 9. lokakuuta 2019 13:34
Vastaanottaja: Jukka Pakkanen
Kopio: bind-us...@isc.org
Aihe: Re: DNSSEC 9.14.6 error message
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> Having these *error* messages in the syslog when restarting
Having these *error* messages in the syslog when restarting the service...
guess they are not too harmfull, but why exactly is this coming:
zone qnet.fi/IN (signed): receive_secure_serial: unchanged
Just have this zone signed, but similar behaviout with other zones too.
BIND 9.14.6 (Win)
Thx,
Already found out about
https://ftp.isc.org/isc/dnssec-guide/html/dnssec-guide.html, and that example
the dnssec-enable option is now on by default… but any usefull hints still
gladly received
Jukka
Lähettäjä: bind-users Puolesta Jukka Pakkanen
Lähetetty: 23. syyskuuta 2019 22:17
I am finally diging in to DNSSEC, updating out BIND 9.14.5 servers to support
it, both resolving & signing, secure zone transfers etc.
I just have read the DNSSEC Mastery by Michael W. Lucas from year 2013, and my
question basically is, is this information from 6 years back still valid, or
-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Sent: 10. kesäkuuta 2019 20:01
To: Jukka Pakkanen
Cc: c...@cam.ac.uk; bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Strange DNS problem
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 05:43:02PM +, Jukka Pakkanen
wrote a message of 58 lines which said:
> Then, unfortunately our nameservers wo
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thompson On Behalf Of Chris Thompson
Sent: 10. kesäkuuta 2019 17:30
To: Jukka Pakkanen
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Strange DNS problem
On Jun 10 2019, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>We have a strange problem related to DNS services, maybe someone h
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thompson On Behalf Of Chris Thompson
Sent: 10. kesäkuuta 2019 17:30
To: Jukka Pakkanen
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: Strange DNS problem
On Jun 10 2019, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>We have a strange problem related to DNS services, maybe someone h
quiring
their servers directly by servers IP addresses. Their NS records in the
fi-root look little suspicious, like some of the servers lacked glue records,
but not sure about that.
Jukka Pakkanen
Q-Net Oy
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailma
.1 of the RFC1035, where it is
stated that "code 2 = server failure", and this should prove that our servers
are not working because they got "server failure" error ;-)
Jukka
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch [mailto:d...@dotat.at]
Sent: keskiviikko 26. syyskuuta 2
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jukka
Pakkanen
Sent: keskiviikko 26. syyskuuta 2018 11.55
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: BIND DNS problem (?)
Started logging named now, but don't see much debug information with these
logging settings:
logging {
category lame
94 client @01F51768CA50 62.142.220.9#47990
(73cb7fd0d8c8b44cd6e741d6eed0e612.smg.ultra.brightmail.com): query failed
(SERVFAIL) for 73cb7fd0d8c8b44cd6e741d6eed0e612.smg.ultra.brightmail.com/IN/TXT
at ..\query.c:10692
...
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On B
.com/IN/TXT
at ..\query.c:10692
From: Jukka Pakkanen
Sent: keskiviikko 26. syyskuuta 2018 10.17
To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Subject: RE: BIND DNS problem (?)
Updated the pic, should be readable now... posting the pcap later.
Jukka
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] O
in to see anything. Please post a better screenshot or better
yet post the .pcap itself for download and review.
John
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jukka
Pakkanen
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:46 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org<mailto:b
We are running a couple of Symantec SMG servers, and their DNS clients are
configured to use your BIND 9.12.2 DNS servers.
In both SMG servers we get the same DNS "server failure" error from all our DNS
servers when they do some TXT queries to SMG:
http://www.qnet.fi/jp/dns.png
(sorry for the
Are you using IP addresses or domain names when testing? If it works with IP
address, but not with names, the sec. DNS server is lacking proper DNS services
itself.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of The
Why not just:
acl X {A; B, C; ...; };
options {
...
allow-query { any; };
allow-recursion { X; };
...};
Jukka
8.7.2012 11:24, Phil Mayers kirjoitti:
On 07/08/2012 07:15 AM, Mr BeEye wrote:
Hello all.
Let's have a finite list of IPv4 (private and public) addresses, e.g.
{A, B, C,
www in cname mydomain.myshopify.com.
mydomain.com. in cname mydomain.myshopify.com.
Is this what you are looking for?
8.1.2012 17:48, enigmedia kirjoitti:
Hi All: I have a situation where I need to forward requests for mydomain.com
and www.mydomain.com to a third party:
8.1.2012 19:02, enigmedia (onl) kirjoitti:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:00:07 +0200 Jukka Pakkanen
jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote
www in cname mydomain.myshopify.com.
mydomain.com. in cname
mydomain.myshopify.com.
Is this what you are looking for?
Yes, but I thought you couldn't use a cname
8.1.2012 20:46, Jukka Pakkanen kirjoitti:
8.1.2012 19:02, enigmedia (onl) kirjoitti:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:00:07 +0200 Jukka Pakkanen
jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote
www in cname mydomain.myshopify.com.
mydomain.com. in cname
mydomain.myshopify.com.
Is this what you are looking for?
Yes
I think it's splitting hair but cname might be a bit more efficient. At
least in the webserver end.
In practise, I don't think there's a real difference. You can choose
which ever feels better :)
Jukka
28.9.2011 17:36, feralert kirjoitti:
Thanks Jeff,
But I really only wrote that as an
Webserver still has to get the request, so one way or the other is
required anyway :)
28.9.2011 17:43, ?? kirjoitti:
this is the stuff what should be done by webserver rather than by DNS.
i,e, Apache rewrite will do that.
? 2011-9-28 ??10:29,feralert feral...@gmail.com
The link in the download page seems to point to b2...
Jukka
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
16.7.2011 21:37, Evan Hunt kirjoitti:
The link in the download page seems to point to b2...
Whoops. Thanks, we'll get that fixed. Meantime, you can use the
direct ftp URL:
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.8.1b3/BIND9.8.1b3.zip
Yeah figured the correct address and just in the process of
I'm moving one of our DNS servers (Win 2003 R2, v9.7.0) to a new 2008 R2
x64 server.
After installing v9.8.0 I copied the /etc directory subdirectories,
the named user has full rights in relevant directories and log on as a
service rights... still I get the following error in eventviewer
15.10.2010 20:54, Niobos kirjoitti:
What's the advantage of using a date anyway? I too can see when a zone
was last edited, even down to the second, by watching the RRSIG(SOA) timing.
Time usually goes to one direction only, forward... so using date/time
makes sure you are always
3.8.2010 15:07, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us kirjoitti:
My employer decided to host our website on another server off-site.
My problem is getting our dns to point from our old server to the new.
Currently we own all the ip's and host our own website. Here is the
zone file for
Lately have seen in our 9.7.1-P1 server following errors:
SOCKET_RECV: Windows error code: 1236, returning ISC error 54
And this warning:
*** POKED TIMER ***
Browsing the net told that this is/was a a common problem to even
earlier Bind 9.x.x versions, but couldn't find any explanation or
Doing first time the RFC 2317 style subnet reverse DNS, and have a
problem with recursion. When doing a query like dig @ns1.qnet.fi -x
62.142.217.200 is succeeds from the local network, but outside I get
recursion requested but not available. Our /24 reverse zones work
fine, the server knows
29.7.2010 11:29, Phil Mayers kirjoitti:
On 07/29/2010 08:58 AM, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Doing first time the RFC 2317 style subnet reverse DNS, and have a
problem with recursion. When doing a query like dig @ns1.qnet.fi -x
62.142.217.200 is succeeds from the local network, but outside I get
29.7.2010 13:45, Phil Mayers kirjoitti:
On 29/07/10 10:00, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
29.7.2010 11:29, Phil Mayers kirjoitti:
On 07/29/2010 08:58 AM, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Doing first time the RFC 2317 style subnet reverse DNS, and have a
problem with recursion. When doing a query like dig @ns1
29.7.2010 14:23, Mark Andrews kirjoitti:
In message4c5134af.2080...@qnet.fi, Jukka Pakkanen writes:
Doing first time the RFC 2317 style subnet reverse DNS, and have a
problem with recursion. When doing a query like dig @ns1.qnet.fi -x
62.142.217.200 is succeeds from the local network
29.7.2010 14:26, Niobos kirjoitti:
On 2010-07-29 09:58, Jukka Pakkanen wrote
Recursion is only allowed for the local networks, but why the server
thinks recursion is needed in the first place?
Because it is: dig -x looks for 200.217.142.62.in-addr.arpa.
Your server is not a master
29.7.2010 14:50, Phil Mayers kirjoitti:
On 29/07/10 12:34, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
29.7.2010 14:23, Mark Andrews kirjoitti:
In message4c5134af.2080...@qnet.fi, Jukka Pakkanen writes:
Doing first time the RFC 2317 style subnet reverse DNS, and have a
problem with recursion. When doing a query
29.7.2010 15:10, Mark Andrews kirjoitti:
In message4c516756.5060...@qnet.fi, Jukka Pakkanen writes:
29.7.2010 14:23, Mark Andrews kirjoitti:
In message4c5134af.2080...@qnet.fi, Jukka Pakkanen writes:
Doing first time the RFC 2317 style subnet reverse DNS, and have a
problem
...@qnet.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
29.7.2010 14:26, Niobos kirjoitti:
On 2010-07-29 09:58, Jukka Pakkanen wrote
Recursion is only allowed for the local networks, but why the
server
thinks recursion is needed in the first place?
Because it is: dig -x
29.7.2010 15:21, Mark Andrews kirjoitti:
Yeah, this makes sense. But my question still is, what is wrong in our
setup,
!!! NOTHING
Well, then everything is good and I can go to my vacation... hopefully
the clients whose IP addresses
29.7.2010 15:43, Jukka Pakkanen kirjoitti:
Please everybody just forget the 62.142.220.0/24 network and
62.142.220.5 address, the problem is not about them. It was just to
inform that our servers are doing regular /24 reverse DNS just fine.
The problem is we are trying to set up
29.7.2010 16:00, Mark Andrews kirjoitti:
Sorry about using 5 instead of something from 128 to 255 in the
examples. That said there is nothing wrong here.
Now I can agree :)
However earlier our servers only answered to the local queries about
those IP addresses, started working during
29.7.2010 17:06, Niobos kirjoitti:
On 2010-07-29 15:00, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Anyway we also have 62.142.217.64/27 IP network (you know what I mean)
which should be delegated to our servers, but that still doesn't work.
But it's probably a delegation problem.
From my point of view
Sounds like a problem with your smtp servers rather than dns. Setting up
the A record for the domain should have no effect for the email delivery
in properly configured system.
What mechanism those smtp servers use to deliever the message to the
clients email server, and have you checked the
Chris Buxton kirjoitti:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
I have out Bind servers running as slaves to Windows 2008 DNS server, and it's
working fine as far as I can see (except that the slaves after a period of
times lose the data and never update it unless restart
I have out Bind servers running as slaves to Windows 2008 DNS server,
and it's working fine as far as I can see (except that the slaves after
a period of times lose the data and never update it unless restart the
Bind process, but that's another matter) but browsing the web I noticed
there
Yeah, no problems with scandinavian letters either.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode
Sener ATAS kirjoitti:
Hi,
We use bind with turkish characters. And it works perfectly.
for *www.bü.edu.tr* you must edit your zone like *www.xn--b-eha.edu.tr
*Alans wrote:
Hi,
I know this is a
Hello,
My Internet ISP give two nameservers address.
But when I'm asking those two servers sometimes I get:
[r...@linux ~]# host d.yimg.com ns.my.isp
Using domain server:
Name: ns.my.isp
Address: ns.my.isp#53
Aliases:
Host d.yimg.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
I just saw the same
Sorry, but could You specify more accurately what is bad ? This is
my first bind configuration, so probably I've made some mistakes, but
I'd like to do it the right way in the end.:)
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Laurent CARON lca...@lncsa.com wrote:
allow-recursion { any; };
bad
From: Holger Honert [mailto:holger.hon...@signal-iduna.org]
..
*Please be carefull when quoting, this was not me:
Jukka Pakkanen schrieb:
Sorry, but could You specify more accurately what is bad ? This is
my first bind configuration, so probably I've made some mistakes, but
I'd
bsfin...@anl.gov kirjoitti:
Jukka Pakkanen jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote:
Our Bind 9.6.1-P1 Windows servers are slaves to a Windows 2003 DNS
server, zone company.local.
For some reason t he slaves don't update the zone unless I restart the
BIND service in the server, and after a while
Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
On 31.10.09 12:07, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Our Bind 9.6.1-P1 Windows servers are slaves to a Windows 2003 DNS
server, zone company.local.
For some reason the slaves don't update the zone unless I restart the
BIND service in the server, and after a while
Our Bind 9.6.1-P1 Windows servers are slaves to a Windows 2003 DNS
server, zone company.local.
For some reason the slaves don't update the zone unless I restart the
BIND service in the server, and after a while, fail to respond to queries.
Example, after a couple of days since the last
Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it.
I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop
for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I
want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what
Scott Haneda wrote:
Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
BIND won't let you do that, it'll throw away the duplicates when it
loads the zone.
You need some other piece of software or hardware that can do that
(insert
viestissä:p3evn4t6r9spme6ardiqbohjvlt99vt...@4ax.com...
Jukka Pakkanen jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote:
There are many free third party firewall packages that can be run in
Window=
s =
2003 Server, we use the Net Firewall.
Do you have a URL? I found http://www.ntkernel.com/wp.php?id=18 but it's
not free
Tony Toews [MVP] tto...@telusplanet.net kirjoitti
viestissä:p2vsn4leohtc8dm4a7m8rt4g6d4kem2...@4ax.com...
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
Surely windows can block access to an inbound IP request from some IP
to local udp port 53 ?
Not the firewall software built into Windows 2003
Chiesa Stefano wrote:
Hi all.
Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
years.
Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
I installed it but when I try to start the service the system says:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Service
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
Chiesa Stefano wrote:
Hi all.
Maybe it's not a new issue, but...
I have a Windows 2003 SP2 with a 9.4.2 release that worked fine for
years.
Today I wanted to upgrade my release to 9.6.
I installed it but when I try to start the service the system says:
Event Type
Sorry I've lost track of the different versions, which works in Windows and
which don't.
So... what is the latest version, working in W2K3? And Is W2K still
abandoned?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
89 matches
Mail list logo
