Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
a subdomain.
On 08.04.19 12:00, Tony Finch wrote:
Why a TLD?
You will have fewer problems if you get a properly registered domain and
set up a subdomain of that for private use.
many
Hello,
I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
a subdomain. The subdomain runs on another BIND9 server.
The problem I'am facing is that the BIND9 server of the gTLD gives a
NXDOMAIN
for the ns record of the subdomain. If have no clue what is wrong.
Can somebody
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
> I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
> a subdomain.
Why a TLD?
You will have fewer problems if you get a properly registered domain and
set up a subdomain of that for private use.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> many users/organizations use private TLDsm, just like they often use
> private IP ranges instead of public.
Smoking is popular too but that doesn't mean it's a good idea :-)
> I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
That's a very bad idea,
On 4/8/19 1:05 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
>>> I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
>>> a subdomain.
>
> On 08.04.19 12:00, Tony Finch wrote:
>> Why a TLD?
>>
>> You will have fewer problems if you get a properly
On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
Xavier
--
Xavier Humbert
CRT Supervision et Exploitation de Niveau 1
Rectorat de Nancy-Metz
03 83 86 27 39
signature.asc
I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing demo
environment and I do not want to use an internet connection.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Karl
On 8 Apr 2019, at 13:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
>>> I am trying to set up a
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
> I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing
> demo environment and I do not want to use an internet connection.
It's not particularly easy to get a resolver to work without an Internet
connection. You'll need to set up your own root
If you're doing stuff at really small scale, you can just define your own
root zone and put all of the records into it, including records in the
"phishing" subdomain, and any reverse records you care about (in the
"in-addr.arpa" and/or "ip6.arpa" subdomains). For that matter, if you only
have 1
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> I don't find any of existing domains suitable for more permanent usage.
Yes, and I believe that's the desirable situation. More permanent
uses (such as the (mis)use of .local you mentioned) should make use of
registered domains to
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert
wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
>
> Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing
On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert
wrote:
Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
On 08.04.19 13:18, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
RFC2606 reserves test,
12 matches
Mail list logo
