DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello guys Asking for your help, again. So after setting up DNSSEC I've found I couldn't reach some internal sites on my top domain, served by internal DNS servers There's no need in hiding domains as my e-mail is shown here. Top domain ubi.pt (external

RE: DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Anyway, It is working using your suggestion. Apparently everything is also fine from the outside. But I’ll have to check Petr Špaček post and study more. Thanks! David From: Darren Ankney Sent: 19 April 2023 10:27 To: David Carvalho Cc: Bind Users Mailing List Subject: Re: DNSSEC

Re: DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread Darren Ankney
Hi David, You can disable validation on one or more domains using "validate-except" - https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference.html#namedconf-statement-validate-except Thank you, Darren Ankney On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:05 AM David Carvalho via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org>

Re: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-19 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Håvard Odd, it works for me. Try a literal copy/paste of the link below. Or go to https://kb.isc.org and search for packages: https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9 Cheers, Greg On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 12:03, Havard Eidnes via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > >>

Re: DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread Petr Špaček
You can disable it, but that's just workaround. It would be better to fix it :-) I would recommend checking logs on resolver which is failing to resolve the domain. I guess you will find out a DNSSEC validation error would tell us what's misconfigured. My bet is that the internal domains are

Re: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-19 Thread Havard Eidnes via bind-users
>>and if I run straight "upstream" code, it's fairly straight- >>forward to upgrade to this version, modulo, of course, the fact >>that this involves building it from source. > > It may not be necessary to build from source. There are packages for > some distros maintained by ISC >

RE: DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello and thanks. For now I disabled dnssec for the zone, as there were sites that need to be accessible. I found dnssec: info: validating internalsite2.ubi.pt/CNAME: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure I've been told Internal dns (windows) are not set to use dnssec,

RE: DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hi and thanks for the reply. Does it make sense to not validate my parent domain entirely? Wouldn’t that also stop exterior validation when I request it? Thanks! David From: Darren Ankney Sent: 19 April 2023 10:27 To: David Carvalho Cc: Bind Users Mailing List Subject: Re: DNSSEC

Re: DNSSEC and forward zone

2023-04-19 Thread Petr Špaček
This confirms that NS record is missing. If there were NS record in ubi.pt zone the validator would have detected that the AD zone is not signed. To fix that just add the NS record and it should start working again. Petr Špaček On 19. 04. 23 12:42, David Carvalho wrote: Hello and thanks.

Catalog zones and disabling notifies

2023-04-19 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, I've just started using a catalog zone to tell my secondary servers to pick up new zones. This is on Debian stable so package version 1:9.16.37-1~deb11u1. I'd like to stop them from sending notifies when they transfer in a zone. Neither "notify no;" nor "notify primary-only;" seems to do it.

Re: Catalog zones and disabling notifies

2023-04-19 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
I'd like to stop them from sending notifies when they transfer in a zone. Neither "notify no;" nor "notify primary-only;" seems to do it. Maybe set `notify no' (or `notify explit') globally in options{} and then enable notify on a case-by-case on statically configured zones on the secondary?

Is it possible to move a zone between catalogs on the same secondary?

2023-04-19 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
I'm in the process of migrating a modest number of zones from one signer (OpenDNSSEC) to another (Knot-DNS). (The KSKs are identical so that should not be an issue for this question.) Each of the signers have a catalog (manually maintained for ODS, automatically for Knot) which is transferred

Re: Best practice MultiView

2023-04-19 Thread Jiaming Zhang
Dear Greg, That’s what I thought, of each individual zone must have NS record point to it. But my point is not hiding NS record (or which server handles it) from internal client but hiding which internal domain are we running from the external malicious client. Kind regards, Jiaming Zhang

Re: Is it possible to move a zone between catalogs on the same secondary?

2023-04-19 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
Any ideas? is this the point at which I confess I've only now read about Change of Ownership (coo) [1]? -JP [1] https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter6.html#change-of-ownership-coo -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC

Re: Best practice MultiView

2023-04-19 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Jiaming. Here's what I would do. I am assuming one nameserver for the public zone and one (different) nameserver for the internal zones. You would use more in practice but I'm keeping it simple, for illustration. The external NS is reachable from anywhere in the Internet. If you host it in