On 03/11/2023 20:07, Marco M. wrote:
Am 03.11.2023 um 19:54:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt:
How do you mean remove the zone information?
In your /etc/bind are configuration files.
Look for named.conf* and find those that include zones:
zone "f.8.1.1.0.7.1.0.1.0.a.2.ip6.arpa" {
type master;
a sadly normal implementation but yes you can do
better* Views is a good place to look https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00851
* Make sure to investigate how the company VPN services handle DNS as
it may surprise you
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 9:52 AM Nick Howitt via bind-users
wrote:
Hi,
I am fairly new
On 03/11/2023 17:54, Marco M. wrote:
Am 03.11.2023 um 17:48:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
My problem is the use of external IP's duplicated between the
internal and external masters for some IPs/FQDNs which I want to get
rid of.
Implement IPv6 and get rid of the old IPv4
Hi,
I am fairly new to bind but I am thinking my company's use of it is
sub-optimal. We have two bind masters (and a few slaves), one for
internal use so all our internal servers point to it or its slaves as
their DNS resolvers. I will call the internal one bind-internal and the
external one
On 03/11/2023 17:17, Marco M. wrote:
Am 03.11.2023 um 15:51:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
As this site is externally accessible as well, we also have to put an
identical entry in bind-external so we end up having many identical
entries in bind-internal and bind-external.
It seems
On 03/11/2023 18:06, Marco M. wrote:
Am 03.11.2023 um 17:58:51 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
On 03/11/2023 17:54, Marco M. wrote:
Am 03.11.2023 um 17:48:32 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
My problem is the use of external IP's duplicated between the
internal and external
for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
*From:* bind-users on behalf of Nick
Howitt via bind-users
*Sent:* Friday, November 3, 2023 1:58:51 PM
*To:* bind-users@lists.isc.org
*Subject:* Re: How should I configure in
On 03/11/2023 19:30, Marco M. wrote:
Am 03.11.2023 um 19:18:49 Uhr schrieb Nick Howitt via bind-users:
Can the bind-internal not be made to caching only and not
authoritative? If so, how?
Of course it can, simply remove the zone configuration, but it will
then cache the records from
e options this needs to be
included. It may turn out that there is an easier way to achieve your
goal that doesn't use BIND.
I'm sure there are other options that I haven't thought of, but
hopefully you might find these ideas useful?
Nick.
On 4/11/23 04:51, Nick Howitt via bind-users wrote:
H
As on other replies, a different internal zone is a huge project for the
company, not a quick win, unfortunately.
On 04/11/2023 08:55, Michael Richardson wrote:
Given VPNs, RemoteAccess and the like, I strongly recommend against split-DNS
configurations. They were great ideas in 1993, when
ote:
> * That sounds like a sadly normal implementation but yes you can do
> better* Views is a good place to look
https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00851
> * Make sure to investigate how the company VPN services handle
DNS as
> it may surprise you
>
> On Fri, N
11 matches
Mail list logo
