On 10.10.10 21:03, Doug Barton wrote:
http://dougbarton.us/DNS/bind-users-FAQ.html#nslookup-evil
nice but I miss there some explanations that were mentioned here, e.g.
it sometimes does not query the server user asks for (iirc)
Something could be reworded. e.g. uses system libraries that could
http://dougbarton.us/DNS/bind-users-FAQ.html#nslookup-evil
--
Breadth of IT experience, and| Nothin' ever doesn't change,
depth of knowledge in the DNS. | but nothin' changes much.
Yours for the right price. :) | -- OK Go
http://SupersetSolutions.com/
On 10/5/2010 3:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:30, Eivind Olseneiv...@aminor.no wrote:
However, another site that _does_ work (with both nameservers on this
host, not just ns1) shows the same thing:
# nslookup ns1.sharingserver.eu 178.63.65.136
Server:
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:35:32 -0400
From: Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
On 10/5/2010 3:49 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:30, Eivind Olseneiv...@aminor.no wrote:
However, another site that _does_ work (with
On 7/10/10 1:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I keep hoping for a BIND distro that upgrades nslookup(1) to:
print STDERR, nslookup(1) has been replaced by host(1)\n; exit 0;
Wasn't nslookup already deprecated about ten years or so ago?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:53:29 +1100
From: Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org
On 7/10/10 1:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I keep hoping for a BIND distro that upgrades nslookup(1) to:
print STDERR, nslookup(1) has been replaced by host(1)\n; exit 0;
Wasn't nslookup already deprecated
On 7/10/10 2:09 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I can find nothing in the documentation that states such. If I missed
it, I'd appreciate someone pointing me at it.
I have some vague memory of seeing messages to that effect when using it
on a Solaris system in around 1999. I stopped using it around
On 10/6/2010 11:44 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 7/10/10 2:09 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I can find nothing in the documentation that states such. If I missed
it, I'd appreciate someone pointing me at it.
I have some vague memory of seeing messages to that effect when using it
on a
Hello Kevin,
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:47:41 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote:
I keep hoping for a BIND distro that upgrades nslookup(1) to:
print STDERR, nslookup(1) has been replaced by host(1)\n; exit 0;
Short answer: never.
I've been wishing that nslookup would go away since back in BIND-v4
On 7/10/10 4:42 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
ISC has tried to kill it, but the beast is resilient and won't die.
Maybe we should call it a wombat then ...
Invocations of nslookup are embedded in thousands of legacy scripts and
some folks are unable or unwilling to change them.
Nothing quite
Hello Kevin,
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:42:35 -0400 Kevin Darcy wrote:
ISC has tried to kill it, but the beast is resilient and won't die.
Invocations of nslookup are embedded in thousands of legacy scripts
and some folks are unable or unwilling to change them.
Well said, Kevin! Just have sent
McGinnes
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:52 PM
To: Kevin Darcy
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Unable to query the nameserver
On 7/10/10 4:42 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
ISC has tried to kill it, but the beast is resilient and won't die.
Maybe we should call it a wombat
-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Ben McGinnes
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:52 PM
To: Kevin Darcy
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Unable to query the nameserver
On 7/10
but when I try to configure
my domain name in the registrar's control panel I get this error:
Error : Unable to query the nameserver ns1.example.de
Hm, you mention in another posting that you're hosting other domains. Are
they using the same registrar as the one that's giving you this
its as if they think hackers main source of targets comes from here.doesn't
appear to really want any help anyway.
-g
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:29 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
The ports aren't blocked as another site
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 01:14, Nuno Paquete nunopaqu...@lusocargo.pt wrote:
Are your servers running virtualized?
No, it's real hardware!
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
http://what-is-what.com
___
bind-users mailing list
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:37, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca wrote:
someone with way more bind clues than I would be able to give you a better
answer. the error returned begs two questions..
1. is this server behind or running a local firewall?
2. is bind actually listening on the
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 01:03, Nuno Paquete nunopaqu...@lusocargo.pt wrote:
Can you successfuly telnet port 53 from an external host?
Yes, but it's only a connection. I don't see any output. That' me typing helo:
$ telnet 178.63.65.136 53
Trying 178.63.65.136...
Connected to 178.63.65.136.
--On 5. oktober 2010 20.07.57 +0200 Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
wrote:
# nslookup ns1.sharingserver.de 178.63.65.171
Server: 178.63.65.171
Address:178.63.65.171#53
** server can't find ns1.sharingserver.de: NXDOMAIN
In this case, you're trying to look up
--On 5. oktober 2010 20.20.02 +0200 Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, but it's only a connection. I don't see any output. That' me typing
helo:
$ telnet 178.63.65.136 53
Trying 178.63.65.136...
Connected to 178.63.65.136.
Escape character is '^]'.
helo
USER test
^C^C
Connection
Hello Dotan,
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:20:02 +0200 Dotan Cohen wrote:
Can you successfuly telnet port 53 from an external host?
Yes, but it's only a connection. I don't see any output. That' me
typing helo:
$ telnet 178.63.65.136 53
Trying 178.63.65.136...
Connected to 178.63.65.136.
Escape
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 02:35, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
Quite right, too many people with paranoia come here looking for help but
refuse to let us do correct remote testing.
First post was 7.08am local, its 3 /12 hours later and we still have no real
info, had it been supplied
Hello Dotan,
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:35:24 +0200 Dotan Cohen wrote:
The two domains names are sharingcenter.eu and sharingcenter.de. The
eu domain has ns1 and ns2 on the same server (IP addresses
178.63.65.136 and 178.63.65.188) and works fine. The de domain has
ns1 on this same server (IP
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
Hello Dotan,
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:35:24 +0200 Dotan Cohen wrote:
The two domains names are sharingcenter.eu and sharingcenter.de. The
eu domain has ns1 and ns2 on the same server (IP addresses
178.63.65.136 and 178.63.65.188) and works fine. The de
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 02:47, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
apart from my dig for you not giving real information..
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 23:08 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
// On 1.1.1.1
[r...@1.1.1.1]# cat /etc/named.conf
options {
directory /etc;
Why are you
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 08:48, Chiesa Stefano stefano.chi...@wki.it wrote:
Hello Dothan.
You said: The working site has both nameservers pointed to that same
server (on two different IP addresses on eth0 and etho0:0).
So the question is Are you sure you answer to queries on the proper
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35, Eivind Olsen eiv...@aminor.no wrote:
Hm, you mention in another posting that you're hosting other domains. Are
they using the same registrar as the one that's giving you this error
message?
Yes.
Are you _naming_ the nameservers the same? I know some registrars
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:31, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca wrote:
its as if they think hackers main source of targets comes from here.
doesn't appear to really want any help anyway.
Not at all, rather I was trying to learn. I really didn't want anybody
doing the heavy lifting for
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:30, Eivind Olsen eiv...@aminor.no wrote:
However, another site that _does_ work (with both nameservers on this
host, not just ns1) shows the same thing:
# nslookup ns1.sharingserver.eu 178.63.65.136
Server: 178.63.65.136
Address: 178.63.65.136#53
**
On 6/10/10 6:49 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:30, Eivind Olsen eiv...@aminor.no wrote:
I don't think you've mentioned which OS you're running, and whether you run
a bundled or self-compiled version of BIND, so I'm not sure where it puts
its logs by default. Do you see _any_
Hi Dotan!
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:08:43 +0200 Dotan Cohen wrote:
I am configuring BIND on two servers: ns1.example.de on a server with
IP address 1.1.1.1 and ns2.example.de on a server with IP address
1.1.2.2. BIND starts fine on both servers, but when I try to
configure
my domain name in the
someone with way more bind clues than I would be able to give you a better
answer.the error returned begs two questions..
1. is this server behind or running a local firewall?
2. is bind actually listening on the proper interface?
you could confirm #2 by typing 'nslookup ns1.example.de
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:20, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
and...@aernet.ru wrote:
Hi Dotan!
Hello hello!
You might be blocking 53/udp and (or) 53/tcp port. Try to query your
problematic server from some other location rather than the site this
server is installed on.
The ports aren't
Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:20, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
and...@aernet.ru wrote:
Hi Dotan!
Hello hello!
You might be blocking 53/udp and (or) 53/tcp port. Try to query your
problematic server from some other location rather than the site this
server
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:41:13 +0200 Dotan Cohen wrote:
You might be blocking 53/udp and (or) 53/tcp port. Try to query
your problematic server from some other location rather than the
site this server is installed on.
The ports aren't blocked as another site (example.eu) hosted on
the 1.1.1.1
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:37, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca wrote:
someone with way more bind clues than I would be able to give you a better
answer. the error returned begs two questions..
1. is this server behind or running a local firewall?
No.
2. is bind actually listening on
Can you successfuly telnet port 53 from an external host?
Have you seen your logs? There must be something logged.
No dia 2010/10/04, às 23:56, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
escreveu:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:37, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca
wrote:
someone with way more bind
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 00:29, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
I would like to help but since you are refusing to post the real ip address
or the real hostnames or the real domain names involved, I can not. I could
do some testing from here to see if your firewall was configured
Are your servers running virtualized?
No dia 2010/10/04, às 23:56, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com
escreveu:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:37, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca
wrote:
someone with way more bind clues than I would be able to give you a
better answer.the error returned
You should first verify that you see the packets arriving to ns1.example.de
- tcpdump should do the work.
Then, enable the query log and ensure that BIND sees the query.
Again, the logs are your friends.
-Original Message-
From: Dotan Cohen [mailto:dotanco...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:29 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
The ports aren't blocked as another site (example.eu) hosted on the
1.1.1.1 server works fine. The working site has both nameservers
pointed to that same server (on two different IP addresses on eth0 and
Sounds like a resolv.conf issue ... make sure that you have an entry in the
resolv.conf file that maps ns1.example.de to 1.1.1.1 and ns2.example.de to
1.1.2.2
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+imran=netwave...@lists.isc.org
apart from my dig for you not giving real information..
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 23:08 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
// On 1.1.1.1
[r...@1.1.1.1]# cat /etc/named.conf
options {
directory /etc;
Why are you specifying /etc here?
I suggest you use /var/named
pid-file
Hi Imran,
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:33:02 -0400 Imran wrote:
Sounds like a resolv.conf issue ... make sure that you have an
entry in the resolv.conf file that maps ns1.example.de to 1.1.1.1
and ns2.example.de to 1.1.2.2
You're wrong. The resolv.conf file has nothing to do with
hostname-to-IP or
44 matches
Mail list logo
