On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 06:32, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> >
> > RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing
> > and documentation,"
>
> However you must either disable validation or set up your own root zone to
> use them. [ RFC 6761 has more details
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
> RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing
> and documentation,"
However you must either disable validation or set up your own root zone to
use them. [ RFC 6761 has more details than RCF 2606 about how to use these
names. ]
Tony.
--
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> I don't find any of existing domains suitable for more permanent usage.
Yes, and I believe that's the desirable situation. More permanent
uses (such as the (mis)use of .local you mentioned) should make use of
registered domains to
On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert
wrote:
Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
On 08.04.19 13:18, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
RFC2606 reserves test,
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:35, Xavier Humbert
wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
>
> Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
RFC2606 reserves test, example, invalid, and localhost, for "testing
If you're doing stuff at really small scale, you can just define your own
root zone and put all of the records into it, including records in the
"phishing" subdomain, and any reverse records you care about (in the
"in-addr.arpa" and/or "ip6.arpa" subdomains). For that matter, if you only
have 1
On 08/04/2019 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I believe there should be reserved gTLD for such usage.
Is this not what the TLD /.invalid/ is supposed to be ?
Xavier
--
Xavier Humbert
CRT Supervision et Exploitation de Niveau 1
Rectorat de Nancy-Metz
03 83 86 27 39
signature.asc
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
> I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing
> demo environment and I do not want to use an internet connection.
It's not particularly easy to get a resolver to work without an Internet
connection. You'll need to set up your own root
I cannot use a registered domain name because I’am building a phishing demo
environment and I do not want to use an internet connection.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Karl
On 8 Apr 2019, at 13:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
>>> I am trying to set up a
On 4/8/19 1:05 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
>>> I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
>>> a subdomain.
>
> On 08.04.19 12:00, Tony Finch wrote:
>> Why a TLD?
>>
>> You will have fewer problems if you get a properly
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
a subdomain.
On 08.04.19 12:00, Tony Finch wrote:
Why a TLD?
You will have fewer problems if you get a properly registered domain and
set up a subdomain of that for private use.
many
Karl Lovink via bind-users wrote:
> I am trying to set up a private gTLD with BIND9 and underneath that gTLD
> a subdomain.
Why a TLD?
You will have fewer problems if you get a properly registered domain and
set up a subdomain of that for private use.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch
12 matches
Mail list logo
