Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
Kenneth, I agree with Kasper. I generally like the approach of getting the software out there sooner rather than later. Especially if the paper you are talking about is a method paper about the software algorithm, rather than a result paper. In that case, getting it into a public, DOI'ed repository quickly protects you from being scooped (if that is a concern of yours, it's generally not a super large one of mine). This will also give the community and package reviewers a chance to give you feedback, resulting in the paper being written about a better piece of software when it does happen. Just like manuscripts, no (ok, *vanishingly few *but almost surely not yours or mine) software is perfect after its first development pass, so i'd strongly advise you not to think of your software as 'complete' the moment you hit submit. Consider it an important part of the development process. Best, ~G On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:34 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen < kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a subjective question. As a paper reviewer I like to see the > package accepted. That increases trust. As a package reviewer I like some > idea of what the package actually does, so a statement like "we implement X > which is described in (XX, in preparation), is also irritating. > > Unless you're trying to not show anything prior to publication (which > happens) I like submitting the package first. > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Kenneth Condon> wrote: > >> Hi Gabe & Levi, >> >> Here is my current plan: >> >> 1 - complete the requirements checklist ( >> http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/) >> 2 - get feedback the in-house NGS team, and then from the rest of in-house >> bioinformatics (others who use R more may spot some issues) >> 3 - set up pull requests release on github for community testing >> 4 - advertise github repo on bioconductor and biostars forums >> 5 - compare to other packages >> 6 - write paper (decide which journal) >> 7 - have submission of paper + package ready for October deadline. >> >> Regarding the sequence of events - do other authors usually release on >> bioconductor before submission of a paper or at the same time? >> What would you recommend? >> >> Thanks for the help >> >> Kenneth >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Gabe Becker wrote: >> >> > Indeed, and to be a bit more explicit about Levi's point, you *can* >> > publish your package to bioconductor any time after the deadline, it >> will >> > simply go to the development repo for ~6 months, which, as he points >> out, >> > may not be a bad thing if it's not ready yet. >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Levi Waldron < >> lwaldron.resea...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Kenneth Condon >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a >> >> > package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from >> R >> >> CMD >> >> > check that I am sorting out. >> >> > >> >> > This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far >> enough >> >> > along, although I suspect it might be. >> >> > >> >> >> >> IMHO, when you're not sure a package is mature enough, and especially >> for >> >> a >> >> first package, it's actually better to miss the release deadline and >> allow >> >> bioc-devel users test your package for 6 months before entering the >> >> release >> >> cycle. Making significant bug fixes and other changes becomes more >> >> complicated and more of a pain for you and your users once you are in >> the >> >> release... >> >> >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Gabriel Becker, Ph.D >> > Scientist >> > Bioinformatics and Computational Biology >> > Genentech Research >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ___ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > > -- Gabriel Becker, Ph.D Scientist Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Genentech Research [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
This is a subjective question. As a paper reviewer I like to see the package accepted. That increases trust. As a package reviewer I like some idea of what the package actually does, so a statement like "we implement X which is described in (XX, in preparation), is also irritating. Unless you're trying to not show anything prior to publication (which happens) I like submitting the package first. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Kenneth Condonwrote: > Hi Gabe & Levi, > > Here is my current plan: > > 1 - complete the requirements checklist ( > http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/) > 2 - get feedback the in-house NGS team, and then from the rest of in-house > bioinformatics (others who use R more may spot some issues) > 3 - set up pull requests release on github for community testing > 4 - advertise github repo on bioconductor and biostars forums > 5 - compare to other packages > 6 - write paper (decide which journal) > 7 - have submission of paper + package ready for October deadline. > > Regarding the sequence of events - do other authors usually release on > bioconductor before submission of a paper or at the same time? > What would you recommend? > > Thanks for the help > > Kenneth > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Gabe Becker wrote: > > > Indeed, and to be a bit more explicit about Levi's point, you *can* > > publish your package to bioconductor any time after the deadline, it will > > simply go to the development repo for ~6 months, which, as he points out, > > may not be a bad thing if it's not ready yet. > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Levi Waldron < > lwaldron.resea...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Kenneth Condon > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a > >> > package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R > >> CMD > >> > check that I am sorting out. > >> > > >> > This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far > enough > >> > along, although I suspect it might be. > >> > > >> > >> IMHO, when you're not sure a package is mature enough, and especially > for > >> a > >> first package, it's actually better to miss the release deadline and > allow > >> bioc-devel users test your package for 6 months before entering the > >> release > >> cycle. Making significant bug fixes and other changes becomes more > >> complicated and more of a pain for you and your users once you are in > the > >> release... > >> > >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >> > >> ___ > >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Gabriel Becker, Ph.D > > Scientist > > Bioinformatics and Computational Biology > > Genentech Research > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
Hi Gabe & Levi, Here is my current plan: 1 - complete the requirements checklist ( http://www.bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/) 2 - get feedback the in-house NGS team, and then from the rest of in-house bioinformatics (others who use R more may spot some issues) 3 - set up pull requests release on github for community testing 4 - advertise github repo on bioconductor and biostars forums 5 - compare to other packages 6 - write paper (decide which journal) 7 - have submission of paper + package ready for October deadline. Regarding the sequence of events - do other authors usually release on bioconductor before submission of a paper or at the same time? What would you recommend? Thanks for the help Kenneth On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Gabe Beckerwrote: > Indeed, and to be a bit more explicit about Levi's point, you *can* > publish your package to bioconductor any time after the deadline, it will > simply go to the development repo for ~6 months, which, as he points out, > may not be a bad thing if it's not ready yet. > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Levi Waldron > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Kenneth Condon >> wrote: >> >> > Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a >> > package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R >> CMD >> > check that I am sorting out. >> > >> > This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far enough >> > along, although I suspect it might be. >> > >> >> IMHO, when you're not sure a package is mature enough, and especially for >> a >> first package, it's actually better to miss the release deadline and allow >> bioc-devel users test your package for 6 months before entering the >> release >> cycle. Making significant bug fixes and other changes becomes more >> complicated and more of a pain for you and your users once you are in the >> release... >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ___ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> >> > > > -- > Gabriel Becker, Ph.D > Scientist > Bioinformatics and Computational Biology > Genentech Research > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
ONE more note that Gabe reminded me of! As soon as your package is accepted into bioc-devel, it will be accessible via https://bioconductor.org/packages/mypackage/. Once it enters the release branch, that URL will instead point to the release page. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Gabe Beckerwrote: > Indeed, and to be a bit more explicit about Levi's point, you *can* > publish your package to bioconductor any time after the deadline, it will > simply go to the development repo for ~6 months, which, as he points out, > may not be a bad thing if it's not ready yet. > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Levi Waldron > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Kenneth Condon >> wrote: >> >> > Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a >> > package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R >> CMD >> > check that I am sorting out. >> > >> > This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far enough >> > along, although I suspect it might be. >> > >> >> IMHO, when you're not sure a package is mature enough, and especially for >> a >> first package, it's actually better to miss the release deadline and allow >> bioc-devel users test your package for 6 months before entering the >> release >> cycle. Making significant bug fixes and other changes becomes more >> complicated and more of a pain for you and your users once you are in the >> release... >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ___ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> >> > > > -- > Gabriel Becker, Ph.D > Scientist > Bioinformatics and Computational Biology > Genentech Research > -- Levi Waldron http://www.waldronlab.org Assistant Professor of Biostatistics CUNY School of Public Health US: +1 646-364-9616 Skype: levi.waldron [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
Indeed, and to be a bit more explicit about Levi's point, you *can* publish your package to bioconductor any time after the deadline, it will simply go to the development repo for ~6 months, which, as he points out, may not be a bad thing if it's not ready yet. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Levi Waldronwrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Kenneth Condon > wrote: > > > Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a > > package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R > CMD > > check that I am sorting out. > > > > This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far enough > > along, although I suspect it might be. > > > > IMHO, when you're not sure a package is mature enough, and especially for a > first package, it's actually better to miss the release deadline and allow > bioc-devel users test your package for 6 months before entering the release > cycle. Making significant bug fixes and other changes becomes more > complicated and more of a pain for you and your users once you are in the > release... > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > > -- Gabriel Becker, Ph.D Scientist Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Genentech Research [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Kenneth Condonwrote: > Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a > package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R CMD > check that I am sorting out. > > This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far enough > along, although I suspect it might be. > IMHO, when you're not sure a package is mature enough, and especially for a first package, it's actually better to miss the release deadline and allow bioc-devel users test your package for 6 months before entering the release cycle. Making significant bug fixes and other changes becomes more complicated and more of a pain for you and your users once you are in the release... [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
Re: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
The deadline to submit new packages for this release was yesterday. You could still submit the package for review but there is no guarantee it will make it through the review process in time to be included as reviewers will focus on packages that made the deadline. The last day for the newly submitted packages to not only build and check without any WARNING or ERRORS but also to go through the official review and be accepted is two weeks away. Beyond that, packages accepted after this date will be included in the release later this year. Lori Shepherd Bioconductor Core Team Roswell Park Cancer Institute Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Elm & Carlton Streets Buffalo, New York 14263 From: Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of Kenneth Condon <roonysga...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 5:32:28 AM To: bioc-devel@r-project.org Cc: roonysga...@gmail.com Subject: [Bioc-devel] Missed deadline Hello, Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R CMD check that I am sorting out. This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far enough along, although I suspect it might be. Could someone advise me please Regards, Kenneth [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
[Bioc-devel] Missed deadline
Hello, Have I missed the deadline for the latest release? I have created a package, that runs great but there are a number of errors still from R CMD check that I am sorting out. This is my first R package so I'm not sure if development is far enough along, although I suspect it might be. Could someone advise me please Regards, Kenneth [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel