Roger that.
I've deployed a new version with the patch
from a290da25a16b7c79d4a7a87f522b4068bca04979 - I'll leave it for a few
days and report back.
Please let me know if you think there are any further issues, or any
subsequent extra patches on top that are relevant.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Just
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:04:29AM +0100, Justin Cattle wrote:
> I *think* I have answered my own question. The patch in the email doesn't
> include the switch to xmalloc that was originally in
> the krt-export-filtr-fix branch as well.
>
> I can see from `git blame` that it's in the previous com
I *think* I have answered my own question. The patch in the email doesn't
include the switch to xmalloc that was originally in
the krt-export-filtr-fix branch as well.
I can see from `git blame` that it's in the previous commit,
bc00f058154bb4a630d24d64a55b5f181d235c63 [ Filter: Prefer xmalloc/x
Ok - great.
Should this patch apply to the 1.6 released version ok ?
I was tracking from the krt-export-filtr-fix before, that that is now gone
:)
Cheers,
Just
On 19 September 2016 at 10:13, Ondrej Zajicek
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Justin Cattle wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Justin Cattle wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
>
> After running with this latest fixup commit for a week, I see mixed results.
>
> With the first fix you created, all the processes remained using a very
> small amount of memory, consistently. As per my previous em
Hi Pavel,
After running with this latest fixup commit for a week, I see mixed results.
With the first fix you created, all the processes remained using a very
small amount of memory, consistently. As per my previous email, around
80Mg.
With the second fix, some of the bird processes are using u
Thanks Pavel - I have updated our package and rolled this version out where
the previous new package was.
As it's a new version, I will leave it a few more days before deploying
everywhere now.
Cheers,
Just
On 12 September 2016 at 08:16, Pavel Tvrdík wrote:
> Hi, Justin.
>
> On 2016-09-09
Hi, Justin.
On 2016-09-09 10:45, Justin Cattle wrote:
Hi Pavel,
This is looking good for us :)
It's been in the lab for 3 days across 25 hosts, and memory usage
looks absolutely static after process start.
We have a couple of canary hosts in production too, and they are
showing the same result
Hi Pavel,
This is looking good for us :)
It's been in the lab for 3 days across 25 hosts, and memory usage looks
absolutely static after process start.
We have a couple of canary hosts in production too, and they are showing
the same results.
Example stats:
# birdc show route count
BIRD 1.6.0
Hi, Just.
On 2016-09-06 22:50, Justin Cattle wrote:
I found some time to package using a patch to the latest 1.6.0
release, created from a diff of origin/krt-export-filtr-fix against
v1.6.0-34-g768d013 [ seems to be the top three commits ].
Yes, the top three commits, exactly!
I hope that's
I found some time to package using a patch to the latest 1.6.0 release,
created from a diff of origin/krt-export-filtr-fix
against v1.6.0-34-g768d013 [ seems to be the top three commits ].
I hope that's valid. That patch applied without issue, and I wrapped it
into a debian patch.
I've installed
Hi Ondrej,
Yes - it's a version from git with BGP multipath support:
v1.5.0-19-g8d9eef1.
Cheers,
Just
On 6 September 2016 at 17:05, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0100, Justin Cattle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > A colleague of mine reported a memory usage issue w
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for quick response! I will try that as soon as I can, hopefully in
the next couple of days.
I'll report back as soon as I know.
Cheers,
Just
On 6 September 2016 at 16:46, Pavel Tvrdík wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
>
> On 2016-09-05 16:21, Justin Cattle wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A coll
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 03:21:40PM +0100, Justin Cattle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> A colleague of mine reported a memory usage issue with the bird daemon last
> year, which resulted in a request for a core dump, but we never followed it
> up.
> I'd like to re-open this discussion and see if anything can
Hi Justin,
On 2016-09-05 16:21, Justin Cattle wrote:
Hi,
A colleague of mine reported a memory usage issue with the bird daemon
last year, which resulted in a request for a core dump, but we never
followed it up.
I'd like to re-open this discussion and see if anything can be done to
fix it.
I'
Hi Ondrej,
> I cannot reproduce the problem. Could you get me a core dump when the memory
> consumption is noticeable higher than after the start?
I was going to do this, but then saw that all our instances are now
using at most 28MB for routing tables!
The config has not changed since I reporte
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:10:08AM +0200, Alexander Frolkin wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> > > Is there something we can do to reduce the memory usage? Or could this
> > > be a memory leak bug?
> > This is definitely a memory leak, probably related to path merging. You
> > are using current code from gi
Hi Ondrej,
> > Is there something we can do to reduce the memory usage? Or could this
> > be a memory leak bug?
> This is definitely a memory leak, probably related to path merging. You
> are using current code from git or patched 1.5.0? I will try to reproduce
> it.
Thanks. We are using a vers
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:55:25PM +0200, Alexander Frolkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running BIRD on a number of servers. It is configured with two BGP
> peers.
>
> We are seeing BIRD using over a gig of memory, and this seems excessive,
> especially given the number of routes.
...
> Is there
19 matches
Mail list logo
