Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-08-12 Thread Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
I think that regardless of merits protocol or limitations of protocols, once they become used and stable they merit their place as a BIP. I'd like to submit OA as is on flavien's repository, and update or reword things once it is there. (so he can ACK easily and we can keep track of changes

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-08-02 Thread Alex Mizrahi via bitcoin-dev
> > I would love to see an RFC-style standard "multiple-colored-coin-protocol" > written by reps from all of the major protocols and that meta-merges the > features of these implementations > We actually tried to do that in 2014-2015, but that effort have failed... Nobody was really interested in

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-08-02 Thread Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> As said, Open Asset is not a draft proposal and is already used in the wild since 2014. We can't easily modify the protocol by now for improving it. You can, however, provide a new OA2.0 protocol that improves upon these issues, and assure that upgraded wallets maintain support for both

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-08-01 Thread Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
Sorry, I completely forgot about having submitted the BIP as I was busy at this time. Thanks for the review. Open Asset is actually not an abandoned project and is a protocol already used in production with multiple implementation. Wallet: https://www.coinprism.com/ Implementation C#:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-07-06 Thread Alex Mizrahi via bitcoin-dev
> I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I > also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out > well enough to actually build something on top of, > There are many colored coin protocols in use. OpenAssets is probably the most popular one,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-07-05 Thread James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev
I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out well enough to actually build something on top of, but there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress. I hope it does continue to get

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset

2016-07-05 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:53:04AM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:50:26 AM Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Author: Flavien Charlon What's the status of this BIP? Will it be assigned? -- https://petertodd.org