I think that regardless of merits protocol or limitations of protocols,
once they become used and stable they merit their place as a BIP.
I'd like to submit OA as is on flavien's repository, and update or reword
things once it is there. (so he can ACK easily and we can keep track of
changes
>
> I would love to see an RFC-style standard "multiple-colored-coin-protocol"
> written by reps from all of the major protocols and that meta-merges the
> features of these implementations
>
We actually tried to do that in 2014-2015, but that effort have failed...
Nobody was really interested in
> As said, Open Asset is not a draft proposal and is already used in the
wild since 2014. We can't easily modify the protocol by now for improving
it.
You can, however, provide a new OA2.0 protocol that improves upon these
issues, and assure that upgraded wallets maintain support for both
Sorry, I completely forgot about having submitted the BIP as I was busy at
this time.
Thanks for the review.
Open Asset is actually not an abandoned project and is a protocol already
used in production with multiple implementation.
Wallet: https://www.coinprism.com/
Implementation C#:
> I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I
> also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out
> well enough to actually build something on top of,
>
There are many colored coin protocols in use. OpenAssets is probably the
most popular one,
I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I also
read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out well
enough to actually build something on top of, but there's no reason it
can't get a number as a work-in-progress.
I hope it does continue to get
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:53:04AM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:50:26 AM Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Author: Flavien Charlon
What's the status of this BIP? Will it be assigned?
--
https://petertodd.org