Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP extensions

2021-09-15 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 03:14:31PM +0900, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev wrote: > BIPs are proposals. > It is then organically incorporated into the various entities that > exist in the Bitcoin space. At this point, it is not merely a > proposal, but a standard. Thinking of BIPs that have reach

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reorgs on SigNet - Looking for feedback on approach and parameters

2021-09-15 Thread Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
> On Sep 13, 2021, at 21:56, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'm not sure that's really the question you want answered? Of course it is? I’d like to understand the initial thinking and design analysis that went into this decision. That seems like an important question to ask when seeking changes in

Re: [bitcoin-dev] TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY covenant opcode

2021-09-15 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 07:37:56PM -0400, Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev wrote: > While MERKLESUB is still WIP, here the semantic. [...] > I believe this is matching your description and the main difference compared > to > your TLUV proposal is the lack of merkle tree extension, where a new merkle

[bitcoin-dev] BIP extensions

2021-09-15 Thread Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev
BIPs are proposals. They begin as ideas, are formulated and discussed on this list, and assuming no glaring flaws are observed, turned into pull requests to the bips repository, assigned a BIP number by the editors, and merged. It is then organically incorporated into the various entities that

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP extensions

2021-09-15 Thread Federico Berrone via bitcoin-dev
Hi Karl-Johan, I fully agree with your proposal. In order to de-clutter BIPs and make a more understandable proposal, we can add the additional information in a separate piece. Also, this would maintain the original proposal without any modifications, showing the original spirit of it. Let me

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs

2021-09-15 Thread Prayank via bitcoin-dev
> I like the idea of decentralizing the BIPs process. It is a historical > artifact that the bips repository is part of the same organization that > bitcoin core is part of. But there shouldn't be the perception that > standardization is driven by that, or that there is any kind of

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP extensions

2021-09-15 Thread Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev
Hi Frederico, Welcome to the bitcoin-dev list. :) Michael Folkson is currently pushing for a revision to BIP 2, which is discussed in the "BIP process meeting" thread here. You could help out by participating in that process. There's a wiki page with ideas for this in [1] and the current plan is