On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I'm not a great fan of this proposal for two reasons: The first is
> that the strict ordering requirements is incompatible with future
> soft-forks that may expose additional ordering constraints. Today we
> have _SINGLE, which as noted th
Update: BIP 79 has been implemented in the latest release of Electrum,
v2.3.2:
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES
-Kristov
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Kristov Atlas wrote:
> Since everyone's busy, I went ahead and made a pull request to add this
Since everyone's busy, I went ahead and made a pull request to add this as
an informational BIP 79 to the bips directory.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/157
Regards,
Kristov
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 06:53:54PM -0400, Kristov Atl
Thanks for the feedback. I think I have reflected all of your requested
changes in the latest version, in the BIP and sample code:
https://github.com/kristovatlas/rfc/tree/master/bips
-Kr
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 06:53:54PM -0400, Kris
>
> As for IsStandard() rules - let alone soft forks - better to leave
> discussion of them out for now.
Removed that bit as well.
Latest version:
https://github.com/kristovatlas/rfc/blob/master/bips/bip-li01.mediawiki
-Kristov
--
Hey Peter, thanks for your experienced feedback.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Why mention SIGHASH_SINGLE at all? Its use-case is highly specialized
> protocols; you haven't taken into account the needs of those protocols.
> For BIP's it's better to stick to the use-cases
n Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Kristov Atlas
wrote:
> Hey Stephen,
>
> Thanks for your feedback
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Stephen
> wrote:
>
>> - I think your explanation of sorting could be significantly shortened
>> and clarified by simply saying
Hey Stephen,
Thanks for your feedback
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Stephen
wrote:
> - I think your explanation of sorting could be significantly shortened
> and clarified by simply saying that the TXIDs of inputs should be compared
> as uint256 integers.
>
I considered defining the compar
cument proposes deterministic lexicographical
sorting, using hashes of previous transactions and output indices to sort
transaction inputs, as well as value and locking scripts to sort
transaction outputs."
Thanks,
Kristov Atlas
Open Bitcoin Privacy Project Contributor, Blockchain.info Se
Why would Peter be accountable to you in any shape or form? What contact
did he sign onto with you?
-Kr
On Jun 4, 2015 5:52 PM, "Sven Berg" wrote:
> 1) Hours/week have you devoted to each project out of a 40hr work week
>
> 2) Upfront and ongoing fees for use of your name
>
> 3) Break down total
Authenticator), and Samuel Patterson (Open Bazaar).
Thank you in advance for your feedback,
Kristov Atlas
kristovat...@gmail.com
aut...@anonymousbitcoinbook.com
--
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA
/DarkWallet/Stealth
Sincerely,
Kristov Atlas
On Oct 3, 2014 8:50 AM, "Mike Hearn" wrote:
> I’m pleased to announce version 0.12 of bitcoinj, one of the worlds most
> popular Bitcoin libraries. It is used by at least four Android wallets,
> three desktop wallets, blockchain.info, Circle,
On 06/17/2014 06:46 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The correct place for more information is the Bitcointalk forum thread
> where it was announced:
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0
Can anyone summarize the current status of the bounty? I see nothing
definite about the bounty in tha
On 04/30/2014 03:02 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Kristov Atlas
> wrote:
>> Hey Wladimir,
>>
>> Thanks for building this binary. The initial problem with Qt was
>> resolved, and I was able to load the GUI that chooses my datadir. After
&
On 04/25/2014 04:27 PM, Wladimir wrote:
> Kristov,
> I've modified the gitian build so that it builds against Qt 4.6
> instead of Qt 4.8 in this pull request:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4094
>
> A test build of master with that pulls gitian descriptor is available:
>
> https://downlo
Yes. Tails 1.1, based on Wheezy, will be out on June 10:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/calendar/
-Kristov Atlas
On 04/24/2014 08:18 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Wladimir wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr.
>> wrote:
>
On 04/23/2014 06:28 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
> boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
> It's really good in general.
>
> I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
> (d
On 04/23/2014 04:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kristov Atlas
mailto:kristovat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is
still not compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an
intent
On 04/22/2014 09:30 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Bitcoin-Translators mailing list is an announce-only mailing list for
developers to communicate to translators at particular times when new
translations are needed. Replies and discussion would go to the
bitcoin dev list. Subscriptions to this
19 matches
Mail list logo
