On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> For the non-error-coded case I believe nodes
> with random spans of blocks works out asymptotically to the same
> failure rates as random.
>
If each "block" is really 512 blocks in sequence, then each "slot" is more
likely to be hit. It
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 05:26:06PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Although I agree 32 bits for a version is overkill, I really don't like the
> idea of you simply ignoring the protocol spec to try and reduce your own
> costs.
The purpose of the proposal is to change the protocol spec, not to
ignore i
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:38:06AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> I'm not convinced of the necessity of this idea in general, but if it
> were to be implemented I would recommend serializing the nVersion field
> as a VarInt (Pieter Wuille's multi-byte serialization format) and using
> the remaini
Although I agree 32 bits for a version is overkill, I really don't like the
idea of you simply ignoring the protocol spec to try and reduce your own
costs. Especially because in future we should make unknown versions a
validation rule, so we can easily trigger hard forks.
If this change was introd
> If changing the structure of the block header, wouldnt you also need to
> increment the version number to 3?
No, in this case I don't think so. Incrementing the version number has
two purposes:
1. inform old clients that something new is going on
2. be able to phase out old version numbers and
I will drink to that!
Bitte ein Bit! (A Bit please - aka Bitburger Beer)
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 4, 2014, at 12:17 AM, "Aaron Voisine" wrote:
>
> Bit by bit, it's become clear that it's a bit much to worry even a
> little bit that overloading the word "bit" would be every bit as bad
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> Is it more complex? The current implementation using template matching
> seems more complex than `if script.vch[0] == OP_RETURN &&
> script.vch.size() < 42`
Not much more complex.
The template matches a two-chunk script with OP_RETURN + o
>
> e.g. in the UK sole traders (that is, unincorporated businesses) can't
> get EV certs because the UK doesn't maintain a trade register of such
> businesses
>
Sole traders can just trade under their own name, or their email address,
or their domain name, heck even their telephone number if some
El 03/05/2014 03:55 p.m., Mark Friedenbach escribió:
>
> On 05/03/2014 11:39 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
>> The standard format ended up being exactly:
>>
>> OP_RETURN <0 to 40-byte PUSHDATA>
>>
Please remember that the code actually does not implement the "standard
format" (at least the last time I
Thanks, that makes sense, just wanted to make sure this what the problem
was.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Flavien Charlon
> wrote:
> > Outputs are above dust, inputs are not spent. OP_RETURN is supposed to be
> > standard in 0.9.1 and th
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> Wladimir,
>
> what is missing is a decision to pull for the reference client.
> Or did I missed that bit?
No opinion - we'll follow whatever the rest does.
Wladimir
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
