Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-May-2002 dan radom wrote: it seems it still reports ... lunar:~$ blackbox -version Blackbox 1997 - 2000 Brad Hughes 0.65.0alpha3 : (c) 2001 - 2002 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry and bsetroot no longer sets a root image in such a way that it works with Eterm

Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-May-2002 dan radom wrote: errr i meant bsetbg, not bsetroot * dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: it seems it still reports ... lunar:~$ blackbox -version Blackbox 1997 - 2000 Brad Hughes 0.65.0alpha3 : (c) 2001 - 2002 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry and

Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread Mr . X
On Tue, 14 May 2002 22:39:32 -0600 dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: errr i meant bsetbg, not bsetroot * dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: it seems it still reports ... lunar:~$ blackbox -version Blackbox 1997 - 2000 Brad Hughes 0.65.0alpha3 : (c)

Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread Mr . X
On Wed, 15 May 2002 00:56:50 -0400 Mr.X [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2002 22:39:32 -0600 dan radom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: errr i meant bsetbg, not bsetroot * dan radom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: it seems it still reports ... lunar:~$ blackbox -version

Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread dan radom
i figured as much, silly Shaleh! :) * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 15-May-2002 dan radom wrote: it seems it still reports ... lunar:~$ blackbox -version Blackbox 1997 - 2000 Brad Hughes 0.65.0alpha3 : (c) 2001 - 2002 Sean 'Shaleh'

Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread Wojciech Krygier
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:30:10PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: http://sf.net/projects/blackboxwm as always. *WARNING* failure to 'make install' will lead to weird menu behaviour due to out of date translation files. More bugs, more cleanups, more speed! Updates: bsetbg and

[PATCH] anti aliased fonts in 0.62.1

2002-05-15 Thread Johannes Winkelmann
Hello, While checking the various forks of blackbox I saw the anti aliased fonts in waimea, and being an anti aliasing addict I decided to try this in blackbox as well (guided by the AA-patch against aewm)... just for the fun of having (and doing) it :-) Screenshots:

Re: 0.65.0alpha4 released

2002-05-15 Thread dan radom
sometimes waiting X milisecs is too long to wait for autoraise. dan * Wojciech Krygier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: snip But now there is one thing I can't stop thinking about: Auto Raise and Click Raise. I'm curious what is the point in having them both turned on? Wojciech Krygier /snip

Re: [PATCH] anti aliased fonts in 0.62.1

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-May-2002 Johannes Winkelmann wrote: Hello, While checking the various forks of blackbox I saw the anti aliased fonts in waimea, and being an anti aliasing addict I decided to try this in blackbox as well (guided by the AA-patch against aewm)... just for the fun of having (and doing)

Re: [PATCH] anti aliased fonts in 0.62.1

2002-05-15 Thread SATO Satoru
Hi, On Wed, 15 May 2002 15:45:40 +0200 Johannes Winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, While checking the various forks of blackbox I saw the anti aliased fonts in waimea, and being an anti aliasing addict I decided to try this in blackbox as well (guided by the AA-patch against

Re: [PATCH] anti aliased fonts in 0.62.1

2002-05-15 Thread Johannes Winkelmann
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 00:44:23 +0900, SATO Satoru wrote: Hi, On Wed, 15 May 2002 15:45:40 +0200 Johannes Winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] - it seems your patch doesn't support multibyte charaters; ex. only using XftDrawString8() (aewm also lacks this). yes, you're right, I

need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
#554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong. Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a) recreate it and b) give some insight into the problem.

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong. Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a) recreate it

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong. Anyone out there mind giving this one a

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote: The description sounds very similiar to the spin-lock problem I was experiencing randomly on one of my systems in the past (see ML archives). indeed, it does.

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Mr . X
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not #recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong. Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a) recreate it

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-May-2002 Mr.X wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not #recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong. Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and

exit blackbox

2002-05-15 Thread Denis
Hi, I have some entries in my blackbox-menu: killall blackbox startx killall blackbox startx -- -layout layout1 killall blackbox reboot killall blackbox shutdown -h now In version 0.62pre this works fine, in 0.65alpha4 blackbox craches if I click the

Re: exit blackbox

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-May-2002 Denis wrote: Hi, I have some entries in my blackbox-menu: killall blackbox startx killall blackbox startx -- -layout layout1 My guess is when blackbox exits via the signal handler it takes the running killall with it. Is there some reason not to run xdm?

Re: exit blackbox

2002-05-15 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Wed, 15 May 2002 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-May-2002 Denis wrote: I have some entries in my blackbox-menu: killall blackbox startx killall blackbox startx -- -layout layout1 My guess is when blackbox exits via the signal

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Wilson
On Wed, 15 May 2002 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #554003 on the sf.net tracker is causing us problems. I can not recreate it here and the first guess seems to be wrong. Anyone out there mind giving this one a look and seeing if you can a) recreate it

Re: exit blackbox

2002-05-15 Thread Denis
Hi, thanks for the response. On Wed, 15 May 2002 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-May-2002 Denis wrote: Hi, I have some entries in my blackbox-menu: killall blackbox startx killall blackbox startx -- -layout layout1 My guess

Re: need help debugging

2002-05-15 Thread Mr . X
On Wed, 15 May 2002 13:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm, scary, mozilla is an mp3 player too? eek. I wonder if this is part of the issue. No, I didn't mean playing mp3s WITH Mozilla, I meant with XMMS, or Freeamp, or anything for that matter. That makes

Re: exit blackbox

2002-05-15 Thread xOr
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:13:54AM +0200, Denis wrote: Hi, thanks for the response. On Wed, 15 May 2002 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15-May-2002 Denis wrote: Hi, I have some entries in my blackbox-menu: killall blackbox

Re: exit blackbox

2002-05-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
won't using the [restart] menu item let you do this without the explicit killall? it should, yes. I was assuming he had some reason for using the killall.