blackbox@trolltech.com

2002-04-15 Thread cash
Çë¿´ÍêÒÔϵÄÎÄ×Ö£¬ÔÙ¾ö¶¨ÄúÊÇ·ñµã»÷Ï·½µÄÁ¬½Ó¡£ ²ÆÉñϵͳÒÑÈ«Ãæ¼ÓÇ¿£¬Õ¾µãÓµÓÐÄ¿Ç°ËùÓйúÄÚMLMÕ¾µãµÄÏà¹ØÐÅÏ¢£¬¾ø¶ÔÊÇͬÆäËûÀàÕ¾µãËùÎÞ·¨±ÈÄâµÄ¡£ ºÜ¶àÈ˶¼ÏÛĽÄÇЩÓÐÇ®ÈË£¬ÏÛĽËûÃÇÓÐƯÁÁµÄ·¿×Ó¡¢³µ×Ó¡¢ÆÞ×Ó£¬Ò»ÇеÄÒ»ÇС£ ¿´µ½µÄÊÇËûÃÇÊÂÒµµÄÈçºÎ³É¹¦£¬È´Ã»Óп´µ½ËûÃÇ´´ÒµµÄ¼èÄÑ¡£

Solaris compilation problem solved.

2002-04-15 Thread William K Baran
With a little help from Hal King I was able to solve the problem I had when compiling BlackBox on Solaris 2.8. So incase anyone else has or is having the same problem, here's what I had to do: When running configure, explicitely include libstdc++ like so: LIBS=-lstdc++ ./configure

Re: Solaris compilation problem solved.

2002-04-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-Apr-2002 William K Baran wrote: With a little help from Hal King I was able to solve the problem I had when compiling BlackBox on Solaris 2.8. So incase anyone else has or is having the same problem, here's what I had to do: When running configure, explicitely include libstdc++ like

Re: Solaris compilation problem solved.

2002-04-15 Thread Eric Binet
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 15-Apr-2002 William K Baran wrote: With a little help from Hal King I was able to solve the problem I had when compiling BlackBox on Solaris 2.8. So incase anyone else has or is having the same problem, here's what I had to do: When

Re: Solaris compilation problem solved.

2002-04-15 Thread David Bonner
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:03:41PM -0400, Eric Binet wrote: I think LD_LIBRARY_PATH is only used at runtime, this means that the compiler only checks standard directories automatically. Maybe you had libstdc++ in a nonstandard directory. This might be why you had to tell configure. right,

Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Ciprian Popovici
If you have the time, please have a look at this: http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/ It's supposed to be an overview of BlackBox. I'm not sure if I got everything right, especially stuff about the history of BlackBox. I'd appreciate comments, pointers and maybe some extra info about the

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:48:03 +0300 Ciprian Popovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have the time, please have a look at this: http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/ Interesting. I'd appreciate comments, pointers and maybe some extra info about the beginnings of BlackBox. A few observations:

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:48:03PM +0300, Ciprian Popovici wrote: If you have the time, please have a look at this: http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/ Not bad. Too much text tho'... begs for sub-pages. It's supposed to be an overview of BlackBox. I'm not sure if I got everything right,

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 15-Apr-2002 Ciprian Popovici wrote: If you have the time, please have a look at this: http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/ It's supposed to be an overview of BlackBox. I'm not sure if I got everything right, especially stuff about the history of BlackBox. I'd appreciate comments, pointers

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Blackbox needs a backup presence on the net, bad. Brad et.al. had a pretty good tutorial going at the blackbox.alug.org site but it hasn't been updated in many months (that I could tell), maybe you could help yourself to one degree or another and ensure that it lives. Collect

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:17:12PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Mac OS X Does the current CVS work under OS X? I haven't tried. I'm still running 61.1 there. :) -- Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.cox.net/msw

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Apr-2002 Marc Wilson wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:17:12PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Mac OS X Does the current CVS work under OS X? I haven't tried. I'm still running 61.1 there. :) I have been told it does.

Re: Another BlackBox fan site

2002-04-15 Thread Eric Carlsen
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: - Blackbox needs a backup presence on the net, bad. Brad et.al. had a pretty good tutorial going at the blackbox.alug.org site but it hasn't been updated in many months (that I could tell), maybe you could help yourself to one degree or another and ensure that it

The Slit

2002-04-15 Thread Es Bee Ex
As far as the slit is concerned, if apps will eventually be movable within it, how about having that the moving be accomplished with a menu? On the slit border around an app, the menu items Move Up and Move Down (and Move Left and Move Right for the other orientation) can be used to move that

Re: The Slit

2002-04-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 16-Apr-2002 Es Bee Ex wrote: As far as the slit is concerned, if apps will eventually be movable within it, how about having that the moving be accomplished with a menu? On the slit border around an app, the menu items Move Up and Move Down (and Move Left and Move Right for the other

Re: The Slit

2002-04-15 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
I have yet to come up with a better name. Frankly calling it the Dock seems reasonable. Blackbox owes a lot to Window Maker anyways. Dock is cool. Wharf sounds like a Klingon. When Sean posed the idea, I immediately thought of 'box', but that's probably too generic. I too thought of

Re: The Slit

2002-04-15 Thread mackstann
--- Paul Mackinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Alt-dragging is the standard for repositioning windows (especially windows without borders), this seems like the intuitive means to move windowlets (or whatever the heck they're called) in the slit. yes yes yes. i use alt+left button to