Remove GTK+-1? (was - Re: Nothing Doing (longish).)

2005-10-05 Thread Randy McMurchy
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 10/05/05 12:54 CST: off topicIt seems to me that there is some dead wood that should be pruned from BLFS. glib-1.2 hasn't been able to compile unpatched since gcc-3.3. I'd drop it as unmaintained, along with all the gtk1 applications. Gnome-1, Xmms, bin

Re: Remove GTK+-1? (was - Re: Nothing Doing (longish).)

2005-10-05 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 10/5/05, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Second that. For XMMS alone, it's worth keeping glib-1, gtk+-1. I personally will err on the side of gtk-2 every time, but inevitably something forces me to install gtk-1. As for gnome-1, I'm not sure why anyone would be using that.

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

2005-10-05 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:37 CST: Though gnome1 is useful for gnucash, it is not yet ported to gnome2. Perhaps gnucash should be made into an hint instead of keeping it in the book? Why? What useful purpose would that do? GnuCash works with current LFS-SVN and fills a

Re: Remove GTK+-1? (was - Re: Nothing Doing (longish).)

2005-10-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 10/5/05, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a gtk2 fork of xmms, beep media player. Just make the following symlinks for compatibility: ln -sf beep-config /usr/bin/xmms-config ln -sf libbeep.so /usr/lib/libxmms.so Yeah, I use this, but it's sometimes still buggy.

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

2005-10-05 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: GnuCash works with current LFS-SVN and fills a void that really can't be solved with any other open source package. Aside from those recently reviewed by The Grumpy Editor, of course: http://lwn.net/Articles/149383/. Note, I'm not suggesting that GnuCash be removed,

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

2005-10-05 Thread Richard A Downing
Randy McMurchy wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:16 CST: As for gnome-1, I'm not sure why anyone would be using that. It is a must for GnuCash. Which is a really, really good financial/cash manager application. Of course, you have to have some cash R. --

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

2005-10-05 Thread Matthew Burgess
Richard A Downing wrote: Of course, you have to have some cash And not be married - a finanical management application is of no use to me whatsoever - I already know my wife spends money faster than I can earn it, I don't need a computer to tell me that :) Matt. --

Re: Nothing Doing (longish).

2005-10-05 Thread Richard A Downing
sash wrote: All I do for the project is keep order, common courtesy and consideration on IRC and occasionally offer a grammar suggestion or find a typo in the book However, Gerard values my contribution even though it seems meager me. I value everyone's contributions and enjoy learning from

Nothing Doing (longish).

2005-10-05 Thread sash
My daughter called while I was typing this... I knew I shouldn't have sent it while on the telephone with her embarrassed look sash wrote: All I do for the project is keep order, common courtesy and consideration on IRC and occasionally offer a grammar suggestion or find a typo in the book.

Re: Nothing Doing (longish).

2005-10-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Richard A Downing wrote: Guys, You might have noticed that I have not committed anything recently. [deleted] To put it simply, I just don't enjoy being an editor - and I'm embarrased that I have not felt able to do more. Maybe I'm missing something, so please help me make up my mind.

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

2005-10-05 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 10/5/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:37 CST: Though gnome1 is useful for gnucash, it is not yet ported to gnome2. Perhaps gnucash should be made into an hint instead of keeping it in the book? Why? What useful purpose would

Re: Remove GTK+-1?

2005-10-05 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 15:12 CST: Just a suggestion in case the majority don't want gnome1 in the book. It's *impossible* to determine a majority. The *readers* of the book are what matters. It is impossible to poll them. We recently removed Courier from the book. But

Re: Remove GTK+-1? (was - Re: Nothing Doing (longish).)

2005-10-05 Thread Andrew Benton
Randy McMurchy wrote: I'll disagree here. There are many useful GTK+-1 applications out there. XMMS being one of them. Noted on the XMMS home page: For the fifth year in a row XMMS has been voted Favourite Audio Tool by the readers of LinuxJournal. Not that their self-advertising is worth a

GTK+-1

2005-10-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Although the applications using gtk+-1 are slowly being updated to gtk+-2, it is not yet time to remove it from BLFS. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Remove GTK+-1? (was - Re: Nothing Doing (longish).)

2005-10-05 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 10/5/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Benton wrote these words on 10/05/05 12:54 CST: off topicIt seems to me that there is some dead wood that should be pruned from BLFS. glib-1.2 hasn't been able to compile unpatched since gcc-3.3. I'd drop it