Trac Issues

2006-02-05 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, Directed to Jeremy H, FYI for everyone else. I opened a Trac ticket a while ago (#1801) and no email was sent to -book. I noticed that emails were sent for a ticket DJ opened recently (#1800). Additionally, how do I accept the ticket? Or is this something that is a remnant of Bugzilla. I

Re: Trac Issues

2006-02-05 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 02/05/06 09:22 CST: Additionally, how do I accept the ticket? Or is this something that is a remnant of Bugzilla. I see the comment If a ticket has been accepted, a '*' is appended after the owner's name at the top of the Trac report listing all the open

Re: Trac Issues

2006-02-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, Directed to Jeremy H, FYI for everyone else. I opened a Trac ticket a while ago (#1801) and no email was sent to -book. I noticed that emails were sent for a ticket DJ opened recently (#1800). This response is directed to all. There is a problem with trac's

Re: Trac Issues

2006-02-05 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Bruce Dubbs wrote: This is something we need to fix. I changed a line in the python script for email notifications: This: if public_cc: headers['Cc'] = ccrcpts Became: #if public_cc: headers['Cc'] = ccrcpts And now the CC's seem to be coming through to the list.

Re: unzip552 and PK 2.1 Compat

2006-02-05 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: For now, the second make target should be changed to 'linux_shlib' (if a libunzip is useful to you). Does anyone have any objections to the above change? Also should add (according to various posts on several help sites) LOCAL_UNZIP='-DLARGEFILE_SOURCE

Re: unzip552 and PK 2.1 Compat

2006-02-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/4/06, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay. Scratch removing it...I've tracked it down to linking with the system libz, but have no idea how to fix it. For now, the second make target should be changed to 'linux_shlib' (if a libunzip is useful to you). Also should add (according to

Re: unzip552 and PK 2.1 Compat

2006-02-05 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 02/05/06 12:41 CST: DJ Lucas wrote: For now, the second make target should be changed to 'linux_shlib' (if a libunzip is useful to you). Does anyone have any objections to the above change? What is the accompanying text going to say? How does dropping

Re: unzip552 and PK 2.1 Compat

2006-02-05 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: DJ Lucas wrote these words on 02/05/06 12:41 CST: DJ Lucas wrote: For now, the second make target should be changed to 'linux_shlib' (if a libunzip is useful to you). Does anyone have any objections to the above change? What is the accompanying text going to

Re: unzip552 and PK 2.1 Compat

2006-02-05 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: I can easily recreate one when I get back in an hour or so. I'd actually like to see it fixed, but it's beyond what I could figure out last night. Okay, Randy and Dan...here is a screen session...logged in as root. :-/ 'test2.zip', used below, is in my homedir on belgarath.