Hi all,
Though it is just my opinion, I *do not* like using the section 3 header
for the User notes link. It is much too ostentatious for me. I much more
preferred the simple paragraph presentation used throughout the book in
*every* other place there is a link.
Furthermore, I need to know if
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Though it is just my opinion, I *do not* like using the section 3 header
for the User notes link. It is much too ostentatious for me. I much more
preferred the simple paragraph presentation used throughout the book in
*every* other place there is a link.
I'm
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 03/30/06 08:44 CST:
If so, I think the placement is OK,
I thought the placement on the page (where it currently is) was decided
via list discussion and finalized. That was not the purpose of my message.
but the CSS could be adjusted to
render it a bit
On 3/30/06, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Though it is just my opinion, I *do not* like using the section 3 header
for the User notes link.
I don't think that's what will be used. That was an iteration Bruce
tried a while back, but I think he's using
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I thought the placement on the page (where it currently is) was decided
via list discussion and finalized. That was not the purpose of my message.
Gotcha.
Additionally, I don't believe you'll find anywhere else in the book,
that a hyperlink is not contained in a
El Jueves, 30 de Marzo de 2006 20:05, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Where the /sect2 is the first one in the page.
... except if the page isn't a package page.
In that cases the link or links will be placed depending on the context.
Right?
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Jueves, 30 de Marzo de 2006 20:05, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Where the /sect2 is the first one in the page.
... except if the page isn't a package page.
In that cases the link or links will be placed depending on the context.
Right?
Right. For automation
Hi all,
First and foremost, this is not an attempt to bring up any issue(s) that
may have been discussed already, nor is it an attempt to compare the
different bug tracking systems used in the past/present.
But, is there a way that I can poll the Trag bug system using search
criteria without
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Looking over this page a bit further, I spotted two issues with the
following:
A hint that describes the instructions for creating this ISO imate is
available as a hint at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/livecd.txt.;
1. s/imate/image/
2. That
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
First and foremost, this is not an attempt to bring up any issue(s) that
may have been discussed already, nor is it an attempt to compare the
different bug tracking systems used in the past/present.
But, is there a way that I can poll the Trag bug system
I'm trying to get wireless figured out for the book (and for me).
I have downloaded wireless-tools, sysfsutils, and pcmciautls and
installed them. Here are some of the issues I've solved:
wireless-tools needs a patch to compile with gcc-4. I was able to make
the required changes and fixed the
On Don, 2006-03-30 at 23:27 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have downloaded wireless-tools, sysfsutils, and pcmciautls and
installed them. Here are some of the issues I've solved:
wireless-tools needs a patch to compile with gcc-4. I was able to make
the required changes and fixed the warnings
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm trying to get wireless figured out for the book (and for me).
I have downloaded wireless-tools, sysfsutils, and pcmciautls and
installed them. Here are some of the issues I've solved:
wireless-tools needs a patch to compile with gcc-4. I was able to make
the required
13 matches
Mail list logo
