Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:30:43 -0400 linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] I lied! It took way more time, because setting up to use git svn required some extreme hoop jumping. It was not the performance of the setup that took so long; it was following the paths of misdirection. I.

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 12/7/10 2:31 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: I'm a bit confused. Point VI. Does it mean you build Subversion, somehow including swig-pl in the process and ending with Perl bindings for Subversion routines? How does one do that? The subversion sources come with the Perl bindings. All you

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 15:06 CST: On 12/7/10 2:31 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: I'm a bit confused. Point VI. Does it mean you build Subversion, somehow including swig-pl in the process and ending with Perl bindings for Subversion routines? How does one do that? The

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 12/7/10 5:02 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: Though all this is off-topic for this list, I'll add that current SWIG (if 2.0.1 is still current) builds the latest subversion tarball bindings just fine. I should have subversion updated in the book to the latest version sometime this week. So you

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 16:19 CST: On 12/7/10 5:02 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: Though all this is off-topic for this list, I'll add that current SWIG (if 2.0.1 is still current) builds the latest subversion tarball bindings just fine. I should have subversion updated in the

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 12/7/10 6:13 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: Exactly what do you mean when you say So you still make use of the separate SWIG package? I'm not trying to me a smart-a$$, I just am a bit confused with your message. Sure, no problem. What I meant was that Subversion appears to come pre-packaged

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:06:18 -0500 Jeremy Huntwork jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com wrote: The subversion sources come with the Perl bindings. All you have to do is run: make swig-pl make install-swig-pl JH Thanks. Sorry for the off-topic. -- -Aleksandar Kuktin --

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:24 CST: ./configure ... make make swig-py make swig-pl make install make install-swig-py make install-swig-pl It's been years since I've needed to install a separate SWIG package in order to use the bindings. Now, there could be

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:24 CST: Sure, no problem. What I meant was that Subversion appears to come pre-packaged with everything it needs to build and install the perl and python swig bindings. All I have been doing for a long time to build those is just add the

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 12/7/10 6:36 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: And the more I think about it, because they are SWIG bindings, what you are building is worthless without a SWIG installation. I'll bet you've never tried to actually use the bindings, or for that matter even run the test suites for the bindings.

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:33 CST: Sorry for the off-topic. No worries. Things are slow right now on the -dev list. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:43 CST: So it actually builds and installs a full dynamic C library. It must be building what it needs from swig as shipped with the package. It mentions something about pre-generated swig wrappers in the subversion tarball at

Re: A git test drive

2010-12-07 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 12/7/10 7:05 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: It mentions something about pre-generated swig wrappers in the subversion tarball at http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracSubversion, though they still recommend that you build SWIG according the instructions given in the subversion tarball. They even

Re: cmake inclusion?

2010-12-07 Thread DJ Lucas
On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote: Hi all, I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and old autoconf. I'm testing them right now, which brings me to another subject: Will cmake be included into BLFS?

Re: cmake inclusion?

2010-12-07 Thread Robert Xu
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:39, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote: Hi all, I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and old autoconf. I'm testing them right

Re: cmake inclusion?

2010-12-07 Thread DJ Lucas
On 12/07/2010 07:49 PM, Robert Xu wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:39, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote: Hi all, I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and