On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com wrote:
On 12/7/10 7:05 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
It mentions something about pre-generated swig wrappers in the subversion
tarball at http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracSubversion, though they still
recommend that
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:30:43 -0400
linux fan linuxscra...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I lied!
It took way more time, because setting up to use git svn required some
extreme hoop jumping. It was not the performance of the setup that
took so long; it was following the paths of misdirection.
I.
On 12/7/10 2:31 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
I'm a bit confused.
Point VI. Does it mean you build Subversion, somehow including
swig-pl in the process and ending with Perl bindings for Subversion
routines?
How does one do that?
The subversion sources come with the Perl bindings. All you
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 15:06 CST:
On 12/7/10 2:31 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
I'm a bit confused.
Point VI. Does it mean you build Subversion, somehow including
swig-pl in the process and ending with Perl bindings for Subversion
routines?
How does one do that?
The
On 12/7/10 5:02 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Though all this is off-topic for this list, I'll add that current SWIG
(if 2.0.1 is still current) builds the latest subversion tarball bindings
just fine. I should have subversion updated in the book to the latest
version sometime this week.
So you
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 16:19 CST:
On 12/7/10 5:02 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Though all this is off-topic for this list, I'll add that current SWIG
(if 2.0.1 is still current) builds the latest subversion tarball bindings
just fine. I should have subversion updated in the
On 12/7/10 6:13 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Exactly what do you mean when you say So you still make use of the
separate SWIG package? I'm not trying to me a smart-a$$, I just am a
bit confused with your message.
Sure, no problem. What I meant was that Subversion appears to come
pre-packaged
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:06:18 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com wrote:
The subversion sources come with the Perl bindings. All you have to
do is run:
make swig-pl
make install-swig-pl
JH
Thanks.
Sorry for the off-topic.
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:24 CST:
./configure ...
make
make swig-py
make swig-pl
make install
make install-swig-py
make install-swig-pl
It's been years since I've needed to install a separate SWIG package in
order to use the bindings. Now, there could be
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:24 CST:
Sure, no problem. What I meant was that Subversion appears to come
pre-packaged with everything it needs to build and install the perl and
python swig bindings. All I have been doing for a long time to build
those is just add the
On 12/7/10 6:36 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
And the more I think about it, because they are SWIG bindings, what you
are building is worthless without a SWIG installation. I'll bet you've
never tried to actually use the bindings, or for that matter even run
the test suites for the bindings.
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:33 CST:
Sorry for the off-topic.
No worries. Things are slow right now on the -dev list.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 12/07/10 17:43 CST:
So it actually builds and installs a full dynamic C library. It must be
building what it needs from swig as shipped with the package.
It mentions something about pre-generated swig wrappers in the subversion
tarball at
On 12/7/10 7:05 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
It mentions something about pre-generated swig wrappers in the subversion
tarball at http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracSubversion, though they still
recommend that you build SWIG according the instructions given in the
subversion tarball. They even
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Ken Moffat k...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:30:43PM -0400, linux fan wrote:
FYI
I like git.
I'll share my curiosity in case anyone is curious about git.
[...]
The second thing I tried was to use git-svn to grab a copy of the
FYI
I like git.
I'll share my curiosity in case anyone is curious about git.
I had feared it, thinking that it must be super-geeky and esoteric,
and thinking that it would give me severe stress headaches. But it
turns out to be quite the contrary of what I feared. It is suitable
for everyday use
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:30:43PM -0400, linux fan wrote:
FYI
I like git.
I'll share my curiosity in case anyone is curious about git.
[...]
The second thing I tried was to use git-svn to grab a copy of the blfs xml.
The entire blfs (all revs, all branches, didn't know any better)
17 matches
Mail list logo
