Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect

2014-02-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:12:48PM -, BLFS Trac wrote: #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect -+-- Reporter: gregnietsky | Owner: blfs-book@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal |

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect

2014-02-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:12:48PM -, BLFS Trac wrote: #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect -+-- Reporter: gregnietsky | Owner: blfs-book@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority:

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect

2014-02-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:51:55PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: I think this should probably move beyond 7.6. Everything except xindy is done, but for xindy it really needs (i.) someone who has a document which can be indexed by xindy, and who knows how to do that, to

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect

2014-02-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: If you mean the blank lines between the build instructions, I disagree. The instructions are spread over many lines, and some of the instructions are unusual. I find the extra blank lines help to break it up into more comprehensible sections. If you mean something

Re: [blfs-dev] [BLFS Trac] #4647: Texlive build instructions are incorect

2014-02-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:27:01PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Actually a couple of spaces before the lines between the pushd/popd would be nice. Also add a blank line before the 2nd configure. Finally, we like to line up the backslashes, , --options, etc to let the readers see the