On 2014-02-25 17:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That said, I don't have strong opinions about whether it is in the book
or not. We may want to review it in a few days as we sort out other
areas.
I don't want sendmail back in the book as I believe it's rated worse in
performance and security not to
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:47:05 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 2014-02-26 13:45, Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote:
On 2014-02-25 17:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:38:59 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 2014-02-26 15:24, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:47:05 +0100
From
On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
And as asked clearly: the references are ... , what, where?
Go to your favorite search engine, type sendmail vs postfix vs exim, and
enjoy the read.
Not even the fairly simple effort of seeing what other distros do - as
is
done for much in
On 26/02/2014 17:00, Igor Živković wrote:
On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
And as asked clearly: the references are ... , what, where?
Go to your favorite search engine, type sendmail vs postfix vs exim, and
enjoy the read.
There is ton's of FUD regarding sendmail previous
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:00:19 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
And as asked clearly: the references
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:08:38 +0200
From: Gregory H. Nietsky gregniet...@gmail.com
To: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 26/02/2014 17:00, Igor ??ivkovi?? wrote:
On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
And as asked clearly
On 2014-02-26 16:28, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:00:19 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:58:22 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 2014-02-26 16:28, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:00:19 +0100
From
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:58:22 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
.
.
I bothered enough with it to remove it from the book. If someone else
On 2014-02-26 17:20, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
Yes, as I suspected: you're bs'ing.
That's funny because mostly everything I have ever seen from you (and I
don't even know your real name) around here is bullshit, flaming
incitement and rudeness. Anyways, I'm dumping you just like sendmail.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:29:32 +0100
From: Igor ??ivkovi?? cont...@igor-zivkovic.from.hr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
On 2014-02-26 17:20, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
Yes, as I suspected: you're bs'ing.
That's
Igor Živković wrote:
On 2014-02-25 17:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That said, I don't have strong opinions about whether it is in the book
or not. We may want to review it in a few days as we sort out other
areas.
I don't want sendmail back in the book as I believe it's rated worse in
Igor Živković wrote:
On 2014-02-26 17:20, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
Yes, as I suspected: you're bs'ing.
That's funny because mostly everything I have ever seen from you (and I
don't even know your real name) around here is bullshit, flaming
incitement and rudeness. Anyways, I'm dumping you
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
Hi,
Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
been a real discussion
On 25/02/2014 13:39, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
Hi,
Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723).
On 02/25/2014 12:39 PM, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
Hi,
Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723).
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Hi,
Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
been a real discussion about that. The reason is that the current
building instructions do not lead to a functional package, although
Armin and Igor have tried to do so. Furthermore, there are
On 2/25/2014 10:43 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That said, I don't have strong opinions about whether it is in the book
or not.
I would like to see it back in the book. As Bruce mentioned, Sendmail
has a background unlike most other software. The current version still
is usable and works fine. There
19 matches
Mail list logo
