On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 16:12 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> sed -i -e '//,/<\/seglistitem>/ s/\[/{/g' \
>-e '//,/<\/seglistitem>/ s/\]/}/g' \
> $FILENAME
Also had to run the sed you see above but substitute varlistentry
where you see seglistitem to catch all the square brackets in the
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 04/09/06 15:33 CST:
> sed -i "1,/<\/sect2>/ s|.*| role=\"usernotes\">User Notes:\\
> \\
> \\
> &|" $FILENAME
I forgot to mention, I'll run the following sed also against a list of
all the package .xml files:
sed -i -e '//,/<\/seglistitem>/ s/\[/{/g
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 04/09/06 14:57 CST:
> Not, sorry, not noticed that extra "usernotes" until now.
Okay, then. I'll run the following commands to update almost every
file in the repo. I realize there is redundancy, extra code and
wasted cycles, along with poor scripting below. But
El Domingo, 9 de Abril de 2006 21:51, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> and here's what Manuel suggests:
>
> User Notes:
>
>
> The only difference is that Manuel likes to have the role="usernotes"
> in the *and* tags, whereas Bruce said in just the
> tag.
Not, sorry, not noticed that extra "usernote
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/30/06 12:05 CST:
> That's right. I tried several iterations and was using openssl as a
> testbed. Some other places also got in though. I'd like to settle on:
>
>User Notes:
>
Just a few minutes after:
> M.Canales.es wrote these words on 03/30/06 1
On 3/31/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> and one minute later Bruce wrote:
>
> > User Notes:
> >
>
> Total and utter confusion here. So, do I just pick which one I
> should use?
Yes, this is ridiculous. :) I've now changed all the links in the
book to what is quoted above.
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm ready to run the script, but I'm still confused what to use as
>> the prototype. Bruce says earlier "The above is correct". And right
>> above where he says that is two examples that differ. I have no
>> clue which
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/31/06 19:04 CST:
User Notes:
and one minute later Bruce wrote:
> User Notes:
>
Total and utter confusion here. So, do I just pick which one I
should use?
Guys, this shouldn't really be so difficult. Can you say "get on the
same page"?
:-)
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/31/06 19:07 CST:
User Notes:
Thanks.
However, I'll fix the indentation. There should be none. Manuel
throughout the book used no indentation inside paragraph tags.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> Actually what's in trunk right now for OpenSSL has a role="usernotes"
>>> in the :
>>>
>>> User Notes:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this correct, or is above correct? I'm clueless on XSL.
>> The above
On 3/31/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm ready to run the script, but I'm still confused what to use as
> the prototype. Bruce says earlier "The above is correct". And right
> above where he says that is two examples that differ. I have no
> clue which one he's talking about.
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/31/06 18:53 CST:
On 3/31/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The above is correct. The rendering process ignores the ulink role. We
can access the format in the css anyway as:
OK. I'll fix the ones I've made and any others I find in the book
that
On 3/31/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > Actually what's in trunk right now for OpenSSL has a role="usernotes"
> > in the :
> >
> > User Notes:
> >
> >
> > Is this correct, or is above correct? I'm clueless on XSL.
>
> The above is correct. The re
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/30/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's right. I tried several iterations and was using openssl as a
>> testbed. Some other places also got in though. I'd like to settle on:
>>
>>User Notes:
>>
>>
>
> Bruce,
>
> Actually what's in trunk righ
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
I was too busy to actually do the work, so the official hint doesn't
exist yet. Maybe tomorrow I'll continue writing.
No worries. :) Was just curious why there's a broken link.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Looking over this page a bit further, I spotted two issues with the
following:
"A hint that describes the instructions for creating this ISO imate is
available as a hint at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/livecd.txt.";
1. s/imate/image/
2. That
M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Jueves, 30 de Marzo de 2006 20:05, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
>
>> Where the is the first one in the page.
>
> ... except if the page isn't a package page.
>
> In that cases the link or links will be placed depending on the context.
>
> Right?
Right. For automation purpo
El Jueves, 30 de Marzo de 2006 20:05, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Where the is the first one in the page.
... except if the page isn't a package page.
In that cases the link or links will be placed depending on the context.
Right?
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://w
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/30/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>> Though it is just my opinion, I *do not* like using the section 3 header
>>> for the User notes link.
>
> I don't think that's what will be used. That was an iteration Bruce
> tried a while
El Jueves, 30 de Marzo de 2006 16:58, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> User Notes:
>
That is the more semantically correct tagging for both XML and generated
XHTML's.
Plus, having the class="usermotes" attribute in the HTML's we can to hack the
CSS code to make their look wherever we could t
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/config.html
Looking over this page a bit further, I spotted two issues with the
following:
"A hint that describes the instructions for creating this ISO imate is
available as a hint at
http://www.linuxfromscratch
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I thought the placement on the page (where it currently is) was decided
via list discussion and finalized. That was not the purpose of my message.
Gotcha.
Additionally, I don't believe you'll find anywhere else in the book,
that a hyperlink is not contained in a paragrap
On 3/30/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> >
> > Though it is just my opinion, I *do not* like using the section 3 header
> > for the User notes link.
I don't think that's what will be used. That was an iteration Bruce
tried a while back, but I think he's usi
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 03/30/06 08:44 CST:
If so, I think the placement is OK,
I thought the placement on the page (where it currently is) was decided
via list discussion and finalized. That was not the purpose of my message.
but the CSS could be adjusted to
render it a bit sma
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Though it is just my opinion, I *do not* like using the section 3 header
for the User notes link. It is much too ostentatious for me. I much more
preferred the simple paragraph presentation used throughout the book in
*every* other place there is a link.
I'm assum
25 matches
Mail list logo
