On 02/04/14 20:46, Igor Živković wrote:
On 02/04/2014 06:54 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/04/2014 06:26 PM, Igor Živković wrote:
On 2014-02-04 18:18, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/04/14 23:35, Armin K. wrote:
On 02/04/2014 10:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 09:03:15PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
This ticket lists a whole lot of changes to how we build Tex from
source. I took it, because I don't (in general) like packages which
use their own
The build.xml file contains all that is needed to build in one go (ant
dist-bin) should only bits be needed
you can use ant to download the dependencies too if you dont want full
build.
the problem mentioned regarding hanging building docs with forrest can
be overcome by
unset DISPLAY
ant
On 02/08/14 04:44, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
In the current instructions for Tex Live, we have --without-luatex.
This is wrong, the current option is --disable-luatex. But I have
a question: someone must have thought it was a good idea to disable
luatex. Why ?
The
On 02/10/14 14:04, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I thought it would be worth sharing what I have just read. Perhaps not
everybody knows about it yet.
1. Debian votes for systemd
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/02/msg00338.html
as much as i think systemd is a stinking pile ... for
Ekiga is under other X id like to suggest a section VOIP/Comms that
will add
Linphone
H.323
gnugk
T38Modem
Hylafax
Asterisk
JHylafax
we supply our LFS/BLFS system well it started off as such but has
outgrown the book
we focus on converged comunications as a company and would like to
assign
On 02/11/14 21:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Gregory H. Nietsky wrote:
my primary motivation is to train staff secondly is to give back to a
project that has been a fantastic resource
over the years and to contribute experience on other projects to this
project.
Any objections/additions
On 02/11/14 22:51, akhiezer wrote
Any objections/additions to this proposal ?
We can likely contrib info on what works cfg-/c- wise for UK, for asterisk
and hylafax and modem and mobile, for the non-'OIP' side, if that's at all
wanted to be incorp; no probs if not. (( Why no 'OIP' implem
On 02/11/14 21:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Gregory H. Nietsky wrote:
my primary motivation is to train staff secondly is to give back to a
project that has been a fantastic resource
over the years and to contribute experience on other projects to this
project.
Any objections/additions
On 02/12/14 18:43, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
This does not invalidate your comment, but I think it is always good
when a source code becomes open.
Even if it did, I would not get particularly upset. The comment I made
was pushing the envelope.
For me, nouveau does what is expected of it. But
On 02/12/14 18:43, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
This does not invalidate your comment, but I think it is always good
when a source code becomes open.
Even if it did, I would not get particularly upset. The comment I made
was pushing the envelope.
For me, nouveau does what is expected of it. But
On 15/02/2014 19:50, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:07:49PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tomorrow I plan on creating and releasing -rc1 for LFS and BLFS. (Armin
I can do LFS-systemd version too if you agree).
Please have any planned package updates completed by 2000 GMT tomorrow
On 15/02/2014 21:58, Ken Moffat wrote:
I found some past links which led me to believe the missing xdr_
symbols were all related to static linking to old libtirpc from an
old glibc. Passing LIBS=-ltirpc when configuring aymptote (the
space in that string is important) caused an
On 17/02/2014 16:21, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:10:17 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] lsb_release configuration [Was: ... Iced Tea 2.4.1 and
iced tea 2.4.5 sed unknown option to
I spend most my time in the arm world and have been slacking when it
comes to aarch64 (arm64)
the reason for this is there is no hardware in the wild to support it
but there some promising candidates
been released in Q2 +
On 25/02/2014 13:39, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
Hi,
Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723).
On 26/02/2014 17:00, Igor Živković wrote:
On 2014-02-26 15:53, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
And as asked clearly: the references are ... , what, where?
Go to your favorite search engine, type sendmail vs postfix vs exim, and
enjoy the read.
There is ton's of FUD regarding sendmail previous
On 26/02/2014 11:29, Pierre Labastie wrote:
Maybe, when there is more time, we could start a related discussion
about having optional instructions in the book not distinct in any way
from mandatory ones. As you may remember, I use some kind of automation
for testing the book. If optional
On 27/02/2014 06:23, Ken Moffat wrote:
So, is there any_simple_ test that an editing monkey can run, to
satisfy people that it is known to build and work properly using an
LFS-7.5 platform ? In this case, I happen to be running the
testsuite, but the book's comment doesn't fill me with
The book lists jbigkit as a dependancy of libtiff but has no entry for it
jbigkit does not build nice it has no install target.
ive added it to the repositories and added install/fixed up clean
https://github.com/Distrotech/jbigkik /
https://github.com/Distrotech/jbigkit/archive/master.zip
A
20 matches
Mail list logo
