On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:10:37AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:34:42PM -0500, Brendan L wrote:
>
> > Also I was reading some firefox bugs and it looks like they are
> > switching all their Tier 1 platforms to build with clang.
> >
>
> Which was why I tried
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 08:34:42PM -0500, Brendan L wrote:
> Not you side track the discussion, but I was wondering if this option
> is still needed.
>
> # Optimization for size is broken with gcc7 and later
> ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O2"
>
No idea. I think the default
Not you side track the discussion, but I was wondering if this option
is still needed.
# Optimization for size is broken with gcc7 and later
ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O2"
I've been building with just plain --enable-optimize for over a year
now with no issue. This is with gcc 8.2.0.
Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
The LFS team would like to announce a new book, Basic Packages for
Linux From Scratch
This book is under development and is designed for new BLFS users and
is an excerpt of the full BLFS book. It provides guidance for getting
started with BLFS and suggests
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 01:33:55PM +0800, Kevin Buckley via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I normally add in the Berkeley DB package as part of my LFS build,
> just so I can enable the extra server in Inetutils.
>
> I note though that the BLFS version is 5.3.28, whilst the last of that
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:56:50AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> I was thinking that my next step on this odyssey would be to build
> rustc-1.29.0 on a 4-core machine (to measure it). But phoronix
> reports
On 9/25/18 8:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 09/25/2018 11:42 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>> A quick look at vala-0.42.0 shows that graphviz is only recommended,
>> and an explanation for the sed is still present. But the sed is not
>> visible in the rendered book.
>>
>>
On 09/25/2018 11:42 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
A quick look at vala-0.42.0 shows that graphviz is only recommended,
and an explanation for the sed is still present. But the sed is not
visible in the rendered book.
Experimentation shows that reinstating the sed, with each absolute
line
On 09/25/2018 09:13 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2018-09-25 15:44 +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/24/18 9:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
I think that we should work on automating most of the updating work (build,
measure, edit, and test that it fits together),
A quick look at vala-0.42.0 shows that graphviz is only recommended,
and an explanation for the sed is still present. But the sed is not
visible in the rendered book.
Experimentation shows that reinstating the sed, with each absolute
line number increased by 7, does the job. (And people wonder
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:36:26PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> Over the years, BLFS has grown a lot. There are over 1000 individual
> tarballs listed in the book. This creates a large maintenance burden. It is
> a rare week when we have less than 30 new packages that need to be
On 9/25/2018 6:39 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2018-09-24 15:09 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:44 PM Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
AbiWord-3.0.2
Gnumeric-1.12.43
^ I suggest removing Libreoffice instead. It's a hog, and I can't honestly see
Am 2018-09-24 21:36, schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev:
Over the years, BLFS has grown a lot. There are over 1000 individual
tarballs listed in the book. This creates a large maintenance burden.
It is a rare week when we have less than 30 new packages that need to
be updated.
The most time
On 2018-09-25 15:44 +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 9/24/18 9:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Over the years, BLFS has grown a lot. There are over 1000 individual
> > tarballs
> > listed in the book. This creates a large maintenance burden. It is a rare
> > week when
On 9/24/18 9:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> Over the years, BLFS has grown a lot. There are over 1000 individual tarballs
> listed in the book. This creates a large maintenance burden. It is a rare
> week when we have less than 30 new packages that need to be updated.
>
> The most
On 24 September 2018 at 20:36, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev <
blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
> btrfs-progs-4.17.1
> xfsprogs-4.18.0
>
Maybe it's not relevant here but these two are the default file systems for
openSUSE Tumbleweed. Btrfs has matured over the years and is an
16 matches
Mail list logo
