On 3/27/20 12:19 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 15:47 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
If you wish to change what is in LFS I'll leave that
discussion/decision to those with a better understanding than I
have.
Agreed, we should have another thread for
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 15:47 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:11:20PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev
> wrote:
> > [...]
>
> For me, I do not use my normal script for entering chroot when I'm
> building a desktop in chroot. Whenever I do that I've normally done
> a
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:11:20PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 2020-03-27 11:46 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:03:29AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > Le 27/03/2020 à 00:22, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > > > On Thu,
On 2020-03-27 11:46 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:03:29AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Le 27/03/2020 à 00:22, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:03:29AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> Le 27/03/2020 à 00:22, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
> > wrote:
> >
> > (asking about only one item)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> If you do not do
Le 27/03/2020 à 00:22, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> (asking about only one item)
>>
>>>
>>> If you do not do this, configuring will fail with a python traceback
>>> report referencing a
On 3/26/20 8:38 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-03-26 23:22 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
(asking about only one item)
If you do not do this, configuring will fail with a python traceback
report
On 2020-03-26 23:22 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> (asking about only one item)
> > > If you do not do this, configuring will fail with a python traceback
> > > report referencing a
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:57:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
(asking about only one item)
>
> >
> > If you do not do this, configuring will fail with a python traceback
> > report referencing a /usr/lib/pythonN.N/multiprocessing/synchronize.py
> > file and ending 'OSError:
Le 26/03/2020 à 18:15, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 04:51:59PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:41:40PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>>
>> [snip how, and what, I tested]
>>
>
> And now the proposal:
>
> Replace the Note
On 3/26/20 3:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Le 26/03/2020 à 21:19, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev a écrit :
Le 26/03/2020 à 18:32, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
On 3/26/20 10:22 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
Now the book is handling the case "/dev/shm is a link to
Le 26/03/2020 à 21:19, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev a écrit :
> Le 26/03/2020 à 18:32, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
>> On 3/26/20 10:22 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
>>
>>> Now the book is handling the case "/dev/shm is a link to /run/shm" correctly
>>> and
>>> explicitly. Unfortunately
Le 26/03/2020 à 18:32, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
> On 3/26/20 10:22 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
>
>> Now the book is handling the case "/dev/shm is a link to /run/shm" correctly
>> and
>> explicitly. Unfortunately it seems for the case "/dev/shm is *not* a link to
>> /run/shm" the
On 3/26/20 10:22 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
Now the book is handling the case "/dev/shm is a link to /run/shm" correctly and
explicitly. Unfortunately it seems for the case "/dev/shm is *not* a link to
/run/shm" the book is defective. I'm surprised that it didn't cause any problem
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 04:51:59PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:41:40PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> [snip how, and what, I tested]
>
And now the proposal:
Replace the Note about $SHELL and /dev/shm in firefox with a standard
copy member. The
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:41:40PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip who replied to whom]
Here is what I did for testing.
> I'll reply in a while with what I have now tested (after I've
> assembled my notes). I've gone with Bruce's suggestion to (only)
> mount a tmpfs on /run when
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 04:06:46PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> Le 26/03/2020 à 14:41, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:40:59AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via
> > blfs-dev wrote:
> >> Le 23/03/2020 à 03:49, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
> >>> On
On 2020-03-26 16:06 +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> Le 26/03/2020 à 14:41, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:40:59AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via
> > blfs-dev wrote:
> > > Le 23/03/2020 à 03:49, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > > > On 3/22/20 9:25
Le 26/03/2020 à 14:41, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:40:59AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via
> blfs-dev wrote:
>> Le 23/03/2020 à 03:49, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
>>> On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:40:59AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via
blfs-dev wrote:
> Le 23/03/2020 à 03:49, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
> > On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> >> On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM
On 2020-03-26 09:41 +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> So my suspicion is that when we mount --bind /dev, we lose some permissions,
> and those permissions are needed for FF. I'll have to try again without
> /run/shm
The problem is /dev/shm is a seperated tmpfs, instead of a normal
Le 23/03/2020 à 03:49, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev a écrit :
> On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
>> On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-03-22 21:34 +, Ken Moffat via
Le 23/03/2020 à 15:29, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 09:49:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
>> On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
>>> On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 09:49:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > On 2020-03-22 21:34
On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2020-03-22 21:34 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
# mount --bind /run /mnt/lfs/run
I think it's
On 2020-03-23 01:44 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On 2020-03-22 21:34 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > > # mount --bind /run /mnt/lfs/run
> >
> > I think it's dangerous: potentially harmful to the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 2020-03-22 21:34 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> > # mount --bind /run /mnt/lfs/run
>
> I think it's dangerous: potentially harmful to the host. Some service running
> in the LFS chroot may overwrite the
On 2020-03-22 21:34 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> # mount --bind /run /mnt/lfs/run
I think it's dangerous: potentially harmful to the host. Some service running
in the LFS chroot may overwrite the runtime directory of the service running on
the host.
--
Xi Ruoyao
School of
This weekend we had a problem where someone was trying to build
mozjs60 in chroot and failed. I've seen this myself on some of the
rare occasions I've built desktops in chroot.
Key facts:
1. The solution is (as root, on the *host* system) bind /mnt/lfs/run
to /run, i.e.
# mount --bind /run
29 matches
Mail list logo
