Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

I agree that not changing versions upstream is bad practice. Can we call this one a win, win, win situation. ncftp was patched, a bad file was found on the mirror and you fixed your script :) -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On 6/5/20 5:02 PM, Joe Locash wrote: On Jun 5, 2020 1:59 PM, "Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev" > wrote: > > Evidently upstream made a stealth update.  The original file was uploaded Nov 2016 and was correct at the time.  The current file has a date of

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On Jun 5, 2020 1:59 PM, "Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev" < blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > Evidently upstream made a stealth update. The original file was uploaded Nov 2016 and was correct at the time. The current file has a date of Dec 2016 and is about 2 KB larger than the previous

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On 6/5/20 11:36 AM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote: On Jun 4, 2020 6:34 PM, "Douglas R. Reno" > wrote: > > I'm curious as well. If you check the configure output, is yours doing something like this?: > My configure output looked nothing like yours.

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On Jun 4, 2020 6:34 PM, "Douglas R. Reno" wrote: > > I'm curious as well. If you check the configure output, is yours doing something like this?: > My configure output looked nothing like yours. Configure wasn't even checking for clang. I decided to check the md5sum on the source tarball and sure

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On 6/4/20 5:29 PM, Joe Locash wrote: Doug, There is no need to apologize. I'm happy to help out in any way.  I didn't quote your reply but I'm curious about llvm playing a role in this. I also build it very early. The book states if  LLVM is compiled with clang support then ncftp will use

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

Doug, There is no need to apologize. I'm happy to help out in any way. I didn't quote your reply but I'm curious about llvm playing a role in this. I also build it very early. The book states if LLVM is compiled with clang support then ncftp will use that. Obviously it didn't in my case.

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On 6/2/20 7:06 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote: Subject says it all... sed -i 's/^Bookmark/extern Bookmark/' sh_util/gpshare.c Hi Joe, I'd like to personally apologize, I just discovered while rebuilding ncftp on another system that, because I install LLVM many packages before NcFTP,

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:01 PM Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev < blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > On 6/2/20 7:06 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote: > > Subject says it all... > > > > sed -i 's/^Bookmark/extern Bookmark/' sh_util/gpshare.c > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > Did you try building

Re: [blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

On 6/2/20 7:06 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote: Subject says it all... sed -i 's/^Bookmark/extern Bookmark/' sh_util/gpshare.c Hi Joe, Did you try building ncftp with the second method (built in statically), or the first one? When I built it last (a few weeks ago), I built it with the

[blfs-dev] fix for building ncftp-3.2.6 with gcc-10

Subject says it all... sed -i 's/^Bookmark/extern Bookmark/' sh_util/gpshare.c -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page