Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:19:42PM +0100, akhiezer wrote: > > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:44:13 +0100 > > From: Ken Moffat > > > > > > I look forward to your fork where you show us how to automate this. > > Bonus points for using no more than 4 cores on machines with more >

Re: [blfs-dev] Wrong instructions for rust?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:42:48PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > > I am trying to install new rust (for new firefox), and the command "./x.py > dist --install" returned an error (sorry I have mucked my logs, but > roughly, --install is not an option). I run "./x.py install" instead,

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

akhiezer wrote: The matter is clearly, obviously, not about how long a single error persists. It is about how long folks remain addicted to donkey-tasks; the inevitable stream, cycle, of repeated types of errors that ensue; and the inevitable stream, cycle, of repeated types of donkey-tasks

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

> From: Bruce Dubbs > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:48:07 -0500 > > akhiezer wrote: > >> From: Wayne Blaszczyk > >> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:16:41 +1000 > >> > >> Again, it seemed not to change from the previous version. > >> > > > > > > The central

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:42:35PM +0100, akhiezer wrote: > > From: Wayne Blaszczyk > > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:16:41 +1000 > > > > Again, it seemed not to change from the previous version. > > > > > The central issue is that much of that 'header' info >

[blfs-dev] Wrong instructions for rust?

Hi, I am trying to install new rust (for new firefox), and the command "./x.py dist --install" returned an error (sorry I have mucked my logs, but roughly, --install is not an option). I run "./x.py install" instead, and it seems to work. Although I am amazed it looks like it recompiles

Re: [blfs-dev] Firefox-55.0.3 md5sum is not correct

Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:11:30PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: It seems to not have changed since 55.0.1. Thanks for noticing, and to Bruce for fixing it. I looked at the wrong place in my notes while I was preparing, highlighted it, then when I edited I deleted what was

Re: [blfs-dev] Firefox-55.0.3 md5sum is not correct

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:11:30PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > It seems to not have changed since 55.0.1. > > Regards, > Wayne. Thanks for noticing, and to Bruce for fixing it. I looked at the wrong place in my notes while I was preparing, highlighted it, then when I edited I deleted what

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

akhiezer wrote: From: Wayne Blaszczyk Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:16:41 +1000 Again, it seemed not to change from the previous version. The central issue is that much of that 'header' info (dates/checksums/sizes/build-times/...) get input manually, instead of done

Re: [blfs-dev] vte-0.48.3

I believe this has something to do with the generation of the signal marshallers. I got the same vte error after building the 2.53 branch of GLib. See this for more info: https://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/commit/?id=fa3bc86008cfe517dbb05deb4dff0059f3749c95 Ryan On 08/27/17 06:08 AM, Christoph

Re: [blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

> From: Wayne Blaszczyk > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 19:16:41 +1000 > > Again, it seemed not to change from the previous version. > The central issue is that much of that 'header' info (dates/checksums/sizes/build-times/...) get input manually, instead of done

[blfs-dev] ImageMagick-7.0.6-10 md5sum is not correct

Again, it seemed not to change from the previous version. Regards, Wayne. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page