Le 01/07/2014 16:30, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> Back to the subject: I have tried the QT AWT peer, and again, libjawt is not
> built. So the only possibility seems to be gtk, which needs libart_lgpl. OK,
> since the only usage of GCC-Java would be to build OJDK from scratch, let me
> see if OJDK
Em 01-07-2014 15:59, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>
>> Concerning Ada, it is really different: the package is mature, Ada is
>> used by some category of persons (in aerospace industry at least), and
>> it does not add any new dependencies, so I think we may have it in the
>> book
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Concerning Ada, it is really different: the package is mature, Ada is
used by some category of persons (in aerospace industry at least), and
it does not add any new dependencies, so I think we may have it in the
book.
Ada was designed for the US Department of Defense, su
Le 01/07/2014 14:17, akhiezer a écrit :
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:51:09 +0200
From: Pierre Labastie
To: blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Is Java AWT peer needed for GCC java?
.
.
Back in business,
(Solved my mail problem. My ISP had decided to SPAM
> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:51:09 +0200
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Is Java AWT peer needed for GCC java?
>
.
.
> Back in business,
> (Solved my mail problem. My ISP had decided to SPAM some of
Le 01/07/2014 08:26, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
DJ Lucas wrote:
On June 30, 2014 2:42:58 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
If there is a use case, then I can easily change my opinion, but
right now the only justification seems to be completeness when
building gcc.
> Silly argument, but strictly for arg
DJ Lucas wrote:
On June 30, 2014 2:42:58 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs
wrote:
If there is a use case, then I can easily change my opinion, but
right now the only justification seems to be completeness when
building gcc.
> Silly argument, but strictly for arguments sake, it's the only path
> to build j
Silly argument, but strictly for arguments sake, it's the only path to build
java from source without a pre-existing binary in place. We don't address that
path in the book, and it is a royal pain to set up a proper build environment,
but our original binary OJDK 6 was built using gcj. All subse
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Hi,
There is something I need to ask about GCC-Java: In order to have a more
conform JVM, one needs an AWT (abstract window toolkit) peer, which provides
an interface between the AWT and a real window system. As far as I understand,
the only functional AWT peers available
Hi,
There is something I need to ask about GCC-Java: In order to have a more
conform JVM, one needs an AWT (abstract window toolkit) peer, which provides
an interface between the AWT and a real window system. As far as I understand,
the only functional AWT peers available under GCC are gtk and qt.
10 matches
Mail list logo
