Re: [blfs-dev] wayland-protocols and mesa
Hi, On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Tim Tassonis wrote: Does anybody else use mesa without wayland? I used to for quite some time. The reason for me to start with wayland (and mesa support for it) was gtk4 (3.91.*), which refused to build without at some point. Other packages using wayland now (gtk3, webkitgtk, qt5, vlc) "seemed to have no issues without it" before. Uwe -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] wayland-protocols and mesa
On February 24, 2018 00:06:10 Ken Moffatwrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:46:16PM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote: > Hi all > > I'm currently building blfs and have hit mesa. Under the recommended dependencies, I found wayland-protocols, which in turn depends on wayland. > > As I'm currently not planning to switch to wayland in the near future, I wondered if skipping wayland-protocols is fine under my circumstances. The page mentions that GTK+-3.22.28 recommends wayland-protocols, however, I seem to have no issues on my old box without it. > > Does anybody else use mesa without wayland? I'll start by asking a different question: do you intend to build any kde5 applications (or plasma) ? If you do, I think you will find that kwayland is required. No, I'm using xfce as desktop, with some gtk2, gtk3 and qt5 apps mixed in. My current system uses mesa 12 and latest gtk2, gtk3 and qt5 with no problems so far. But you never know. Bye Tim But if you don't want to use wayland, I'm fairly sure that you can pass --disable-wayland-backend. Looking at the configure script, you might not even need to do that. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] wayland-protocols and mesa
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:46:16PM +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote: > Hi all > > I'm currently building blfs and have hit mesa. Under the recommended > dependencies, I found wayland-protocols, which in turn depends on wayland. > > As I'm currently not planning to switch to wayland in the near future, I > wondered if skipping wayland-protocols is fine under my circumstances. The > page mentions that GTK+-3.22.28 recommends wayland-protocols, however, I > seem to have no issues on my old box without it. > > Does anybody else use mesa without wayland? > I'll start by asking a different question: do you intend to build any kde5 applications (or plasma) ? If you do, I think you will find that kwayland is required. But if you don't want to use wayland, I'm fairly sure that you can pass --disable-wayland-backend. Looking at the configure script, you might not even need to do that. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] wayland-protocols and mesa
Hi all I'm currently building blfs and have hit mesa. Under the recommended dependencies, I found wayland-protocols, which in turn depends on wayland. As I'm currently not planning to switch to wayland in the near future, I wondered if skipping wayland-protocols is fine under my circumstances. The page mentions that GTK+-3.22.28 recommends wayland-protocols, however, I seem to have no issues on my old box without it. Does anybody else use mesa without wayland? Bye Tim -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page