Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 27/02/2018 11:42, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 26/02/2018 18:58:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "rea

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/02/2018 18:58:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : Pierre Labastie wrote: juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS. Can you do the up

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags  : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 201

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867). Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS. Can you do the update and tag it please. I was trying to go too f

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 26/02/2018 03:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: > > lfs81 tags remaining: 518 > lfs82 tags  : 274 > > Tickets target

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to update the text manual - even if none of the specified br

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt > will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to > update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are pr

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags  : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remain

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: Been there too. For junit, I have added a sed to the book, which allows to build junit-4.11. For junit-4.12, or junit-5.0.x, the build system is maven, so it is a big change, and not suitable for 8.2. Note that we should move to maven for 8.3, since fop can be built with m

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 25/02/2018 05:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags  : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 >>> >>> ===

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags  : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags 

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags  : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags  : 335 Tick

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: lfs81 tags remaining: 518 lfs82 tags  : 274 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 === As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018 lfs81 tags remaining: 457 lfs82 tags : 335 Tickets targeted for 8.2

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:32:01AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > The more new things that creep in (in this case, babl), the less > > those of us who have built packages, but waited to run full tests > > before tagging them, can tag. > > > > It's hard enough ensuring we have

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: The more new things that creep in (in this case, babl), the less those of us who have built packages, but waited to run full tests before tagging them, can tag. It's hard enough ensuring we have built things we knew other people were going to update, without getting overtaken

Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 09:43:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze: > > lfs81 tags remaining: 518 > lfs82 tags : 274 > > Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34 > > -- Bruce The more new things that creep in (in this case, babl), the