Re: where is pmount?

2008-12-14 Thread David Kuntadi
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote: I think Ralph's issue is this. The book contains a note that pmount is necessary for KDE to support automounting, and provides a link to where pmount might be found. However, that link does not take the reader anywhere

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-28 Thread David Kuntadi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BLFS already has plenty of packages listed that don't need X. The main problem is that different users have different definitions of complete desktop environment. It's up to the users to pick and choose what they want -

Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-27 Thread David Kuntadi
Recently I have managed to run links -g (graphical links) and I just allow read and write for all for /dev folder to all as work around. But when I tried INX, definitely it is a huge task for me to make similar setup on top of lfs: http://inx.maincontent.net/announce-inx-1.0.html I think blfs

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-27 Thread David Kuntadi
0.3-2 vim1:7.1-138+1ubuntu3 On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:27 PM, David Kuntadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Recently I have managed to run links -g (graphical links) and I just allow read and write for all for /dev folder to all as work around. But when I

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-27 Thread David Kuntadi
at 1:40 PM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Kuntadi wrote: Um, workaround for what? links -g do not have write access to /dev/fb0, and requires to run as root. BLFS is just a guide for installing packages beyond a base LFS system. I don't quite get what you're saying here. What I am

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-27 Thread David Kuntadi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I'm just clueless, but can you explain specifically what it is you are proposing, and how this is any different from, say, building a standard LFS system and a few select packages from BLFS? I am suggesting a complete

Re: Window manager without x server: follow INX path?

2008-10-27 Thread David Kuntadi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, you're suggesting a new livecd, based on LFS, without X? No. I am suggesting a chapter in BLFS to create complete desktop environement without x. David -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ:

Re: directfb on BLFS - Version 6.3

2008-10-22 Thread David Kuntadi
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You'll need to provide additional information about the error message (what program invokes the error, perhaps additional info from config.log, etc., etc.) I am trying to install

Re: directfb on BLFS - Version 6.3

2008-10-22 Thread David Kuntadi
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the moment I'm in the middle of documenting the dependencies on my first attempt at updating my desktop scripts for current versions, and I'm looking at a lot more detail than I ever used to bother about. Based on that

Re: directfb on BLFS - Version 6.3

2008-10-22 Thread David Kuntadi
Problem Solved. I need to install pkg-config. It is not mentioned as dependency (or at least I failed to read this dependency). Thanks for helping me. David On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:57 AM, David Kuntadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5. The script responsible for setting freetype to no is: if test

Re: directfb on BLFS - Version 6.3

2008-10-22 Thread David Kuntadi
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:07 AM, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] You should also notice that freetype did install a .pc file or two in /usr/lib/pkg-config, even though pkg-config was not yet installed. Yes, that was the thing mislead me. I thought pkg-config was already installed. But I double