Would it be best to just restart your system after an upgrade? In the
version of the book I have, it said something about an Xorg Server
dependency being OpenSSL (thats why I install it right before Xorg).
Douglas Reno
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.l
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:55:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:41:16AM +0100, lux-integ wrote:
> >
> > openssl is a package one generally installs early in the
> > distribution-build
> > process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
> > --(a) does one need to yank o
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:41:16AM +0100, lux-integ wrote:
>
> openssl is a package one generally installs early in the distribution-build
> process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
> --(a) does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the
> new
> 1,0,1g and if so wou
Alexey Orishko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:41 AM, lux-integ wrote:
>> openssl is a package one generally installs early in the distribution-build
>> process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
>> --(a) does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the
>> new
>> 1,0,1g an
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:41 AM, lux-integ wrote:
> openssl is a package one generally installs early in the distribution-build
> process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
> --(a) does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the new
> 1,0,1g and if so would there not be break
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:02:38 Rob Taylor wrote:
> Heartbleed vulnerability
>
> http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
>
> OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable
> OpenSSL 1.0.1g is NOT vulnerable
> OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable
> OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT
