Re: [blfs-support] CPU % significantly over 100 ?

2018-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 08:39:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 04/08/2018 08:21 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > The diference here is that I'm used to individual processes each > > going up to 100%, but here the main process is/was running at 400% > > (only 4 cores on this machine). > > I'm not

Re: [blfs-support] CPU % significantly over 100 ?

2018-04-09 Thread Paul Rogers
> While watching rust build/test, I've been running top. My past > experience suggests that a process will normally max out at 100% > (i.e. all of _one_ core), but with rust I'm seeing percentages of > 250-300%. Is that normal ? It does not seem alarming to me with a multicore/hyperthreading CPU

Re: [blfs-support] CPU % significantly over 100 ?

2018-04-09 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On 04/09/2018 10:43 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: I meant the bit underneath that - I only have 4 cores (8 on my haswell) and I use 40 line terms so lots of room for details, here's a quick copy of the first few processes on an idle desktop: PID USER PR NIVIRTRES %CPU %MEM TIME+ S

Re: [blfs-support] CPU % significantly over 100 ?

2018-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 03:04:40PM -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: > > While watching rust build/test, I've been running top. My past > > experience suggests that a process will normally max out at 100% > > (i.e. all of _one_ core), but with rust I'm seeing percentages of > > 250-300%. Is that normal ?

Re: [blfs-support] CPU % significantly over 100 ?

2018-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:36:43PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 04/09/2018 10:43 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I meant the bit underneath that - I only have 4 cores (8 on my > > haswell) and I use 40 line terms so lots of room for details, here's > > a quick copy of the first few processes on an i

Re: [blfs-support] CPU % significantly over 100 ?

2018-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 11:02:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I then ran the tests, but forgot to time it. At the end I got a failure: > > - > "/tmp/rustc-test/rustc-1.25.0-src/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-tools-bin/rustdoc-themes" > > "/tmp/rustc-test/rustc-1.25.0-src/build/x86_6

[blfs-support] gtk+-2 required to compile Thunderbird? - BLFS 8.2/development

2018-04-09 Thread rhubarbpieguy
Compiling Thunderbird without gtk+-2 installed produces the following: - DEBUG: configure:12485: checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.18.0 gtk+-unix-print-2.0 glib-2.0 >= 2.22 gobject-2.0 gdk-x

Re: [blfs-support] gtk+-2 required to compile Thunderbird? - BLFS 8.2/development

2018-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:35:01PM -0500, rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote: > > Compiling Thunderbird without gtk+-2 installed produces the following: > > - > > > DEBUG: configure:12485: che

Re: [blfs-support] gtk+-2 required to compile Thunderbird? - BLFS 8.2/development

2018-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:19:51AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:35:01PM -0500, rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Compiling Thunderbird without gtk+-2 installed produces the following: > > > > ---