Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Improved error reporting in IndexedDB for large value read failures

This error is unique to Chromium because, yes, LevelDB is not used by other browsers. Thanks, Abhishek ---- *From:* Mike Taylor *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2024 7:46 PM *To:* Chromestatus ; blink-dev@chromium.org *Cc:* 

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebXr hand input module - Level 1

Thanks for requesting the positions - it seems fair to me to give Mozilla at least a week to respond (and looks like WebKit intends to give a formal "support" response). On 9/12/24 7:23 PM, Alex Cooper wrote: To be honest, I didn't feel it was necessary given that the specification was already

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Improved error reporting in IndexedDB for large value read failures

Hi! A couple of questions: What was the DOMException.name before this change? Do we know what do other browsers do in this situation? Or is LevelDB only used by Chromium? On 9/17/24 10:11 AM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails abhishek.shanthku...@microsoft.com, est...@chromium.or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

but would still like to support the partner as they'recollecting metrics to evaluate that behavior. On Thursday, September 12, 2024 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4 Rick Byers wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:04 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Chris, A few thoughts: We do no

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Debug Key Privacy Improvement

LGTM1 - this seems like an important privacy bugfix. Compatibility-wise, this won't affect user experience (if my mental model is correct), but sites using the API may receive less info than expected - but that's kinda the point. On 9/11/24 6:03 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-variant-emoji

LGTM2 On 9/12/24 9:13 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for catching us up! :) On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:20 PM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails moon...@google.com Explainer None Specifica

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Canvas Formatted Text

According to https://issues.chromium.org/u/2/issues/40160099#comment20 - it is not being pursued. On 9/12/24 2:56 AM, Joe Lewis wrote: Is this initiative progressing. I'm writing a web-based word processor and this will save a lot of efforts. Curious to know if this is something that's still be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Dynamic safe area insets

LGTM3 On 9/12/24 9:57 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 The fact that iOS already shipped this is a compelling argument. On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:55 PM Rick Byers wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 9:09 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:05 PM Weny

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

Kit/standards-positions/issues/390> * Written WPTs <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/47728> * Requested TAG review <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/992> On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 2:39:32 PM UTC-4 Mike T

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: @property support syntax

hange that adds syntax support for registered custom properties (https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/pull/1104). Will this work? On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:06 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Tuesday, September 10, 2024 at 5:08:33 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: @property support syntax

LGTM1 On 9/5/24 8:40 AM, 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote: This is also the case for registerProperty(), right? Right, thanks! On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:20 PM Rune Lillesveen wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 1:44 PM Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove non-standard GPUAdapter requestAdapterInfo() method

rt wrote: On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 5:47 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/9/24 11:45 AM, François Beaufort wrote: On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 5:39 PM Mike Taylor wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove non-standard GPUAdapter requestAdapterInfo() method

On 9/9/24 11:45 AM, François Beaufort wrote: On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 5:39 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 9/9/24 10:38 AM, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove non-standard GPUAdapter requestAdapterInfo() method

On 9/9/24 10:38 AM, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com Explainer None Specification https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#dom-gpuadapter-info Summary The WebGPU WG decided it was impractical for requestAdapterInfo()

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Real Time Monitoring API

LGTM2 On 9/4/24 11:38 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:13:36 PM UTC+2 Paul Jensen wrote: Those open items are now addressed (by https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1246 and https://github

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Shared Storage: Allowing Cross-Origin Script in addModule & Aligning createWorklet

Sorry, LGTM3 conditioned upon Testing and Debuggability bits being requested in the chromestatus entry. On 9/4/24 10:21 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM3 On 9/4/24 10:07 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 5:07:54 AM UTC+2 Domenic Denicola wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Shared Storage: Allowing Cross-Origin Script in addModule & Aligning createWorklet

LGTM3 On 9/4/24 10:07 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 5:07:54 AM UTC+2 Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. This seems like a good change for overall web consistency, and compat risks seem well-managed. On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:32:20 

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: relaunch Intl Locale Info feature in newly added functions

://chromestatus.com/feature/5148228059398144 (Stage 131, Ship 132) On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:51 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 8/29/24 3:57 PM, 'Frank Tang (譚永鋒)' via blink-dev wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 1:23 PM Chris Harrelson wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebAuthn attestationFormats

On 8/30/24 3:09 PM, Adam Langley wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:32 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Could you clarify which milestones you're requesting? Is it 130 to 140? If so, can you explain why you think 11 milestones are required for this experiment (vs 6, which is the de

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: relaunch Intl Locale Info feature in newly added functions

On 8/29/24 3:57 PM, 'Frank Tang (譚永鋒)' via blink-dev wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 1:23 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Does this feature change the behavior of existing web-exposed APIs for Locale? If so, what is the compat risk of breaking existing sites? With this launch, the pre-e

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebAuthn attestationFormats

Could you clarify which milestones you're requesting? Is it 130 to 140? If so, can you explain why you think 11 milestones are required for this experiment (vs 6, which is the default allowed)? thx On 8/28/24 5:14 PM, Adam Langley wrote: Contact emails a...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli and Shared Zstandard

LGTM3 On 8/28/24 4:25 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:10 AM Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1. Congrats, all. This is a big deal! On Tuesday, August 27, 2024 at 10:06:16 AM UTC-7 Patrick Meenan wrote: It's probably worth mentioning that, even though the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Direct Sockets API

LGTM2 On 8/28/24 8:03 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 - the use case is clear, as well as the dangers of enabling this over the open web. Confining this API to IWAs seems to strike a reasonable balance. On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:46 PM 'Randell Jesup' via blink-dev wrote: This w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove expectedImprovement in DelegatedInkTrailPresenter

Also, would you remind requesting reviews for Enteprise, Debuggability, and Testing in the chromestatus entry? Thanks! On 8/26/24 12:40 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 to remove - if there's no usage, now is the time to get that done. Relevant use counter for those interested:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove expectedImprovement in DelegatedInkTrailPresenter

LGTM1 to remove - if there's no usage, now is the time to get that done. Relevant use counter for those interested: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/5017 On 8/26/24 12:13 PM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails sahir.vell...@microsoft.com Explai

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Update the syntax of `text-wrap` to match the new spec

LGTM2 On 8/21/24 5:52 PM, Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 12:05:14 AM UTC-7 Koji Ishii wrote: Thank you for pointing this out, Demenic. Will there be any compatibility issues, i.e. code that means something different before and after the change?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: meter element fallback styles

LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned. On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic. On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote: This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language

Thanks for the thoughtful article and feedback Yoav - we'll chat about it internally. On 8/20/24 11:24 PM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: I wrote a few words about this proposal and how I think we can avoid some of the tradeoffs it is making and end up with better user experience *and* more p

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language

Thanks for the feedback - but if you re-read the explainer, you'll note that preferred languages will continue to work with the proposed Avail-Language API. On 8/11/24 1:14 AM, Eli Grey wrote: Restricting accept-language to 'common combinations' is fundamentally at odds with personal agency. T

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove CanvasRenderingContext2D method scrollPathIntoView

+1 - no approvals needed. :) On 8/9/24 1:20 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: If this method was only ever enabled behind a flag, I don't think this removal requires any API owner approval. Happy removing! On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:30 PM Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails schen

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language

Hey Philip, Yes - we have discussed this a little bit, and are open to finalizing on that as a solution. But we'd like to gather some baseline metrics on the most minimal version first (which is the point of this experiment), and explore other solutions depending on compat impact (which we pla

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: cross-origin trusted signals fetches

LGTM3 On 8/7/24 11:45 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:25 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 % spec nit On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 6:38:43 PM UTC+2 Paul Jensen wrote: On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 5:28:22 AM UTC-4 Yoav Weiss wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Throw exception when text encode alloc memory fail.

Hi there, Have we done any sort of web compatibility analysis of what this change implies? A broken page might be a better choice than a crashed tab, but it's hard to know without any sense of the potential impact of this change. Also, is there a plan to specify this behavior? What's the inte

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Isolated Web Apps

or LGTM2 - sorry, race condition. On 7/31/24 11:46 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks for the v2 updates. LGTM1 On 7/30/24 2:09 PM, Reilly Grant wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:20 PM Robbie McElrath wrote: Thanks - before I jump too deeply into the review, would you mind

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Isolated Web Apps

Thanks for the v2 updates. LGTM1 On 7/30/24 2:09 PM, Reilly Grant wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:20 PM Robbie McElrath wrote: Thanks - before I jump too deeply into the review, would you mind requesting the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? D

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Rename position-try-options to position-try-fallbacks

LGTM3 On 7/25/24 4:35 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 1:24 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 /Daniel On 2024-07-25 00:22, Mason Freed wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:51 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: Have you had a chance

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

the chromestatus entry; I believe the OT dashboard will be updated to reflect that once the OT team approves that request. Great - I think the OT team typically chases down LGTMs - so you should be set now. Chris On Wednesday, July 24, 2024 at 1:52:53 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: Hey

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

sive. (Existing OT tokens will still work, they won't expire IIUC.) On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 11:02:03 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM to experiment from 126 to 127 inclusive. On 5/7/24 10:52 AM, Chris Fredrickson wrote: Contact emails joha...@chromium.org, cfre.

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Flexible contributions filtering

LGTM2 On 7/17/24 6:22 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:10 PM 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Hi All, * * Just adding some additional detail regarding the interoperability and compatibility of this feature: * * Interoperability

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Explicit Compile Hints with Magic Comments

Thanks for the clarification. LGTM to (re-)run 129 to 131 inclusive. On 7/24/24 4:37 AM, Marja Hölttä wrote: Yes, the OT expired and I'd like to run a new one. There was no way to input the "beginning milestone number" for the extension in Chromestatus. On Mon, Jul 22, 2024

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Permissions API on WebView

, and that we're just closing the loop in bringing it to WebView. Sincerely, Google Logo Peter Birk Pakkenberg Software Engineer pb...@chromium.org On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 01:14, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM2 On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 3:49 AM Mike Taylor

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove PointerEvent.getCoalescedEvents() from insecure contexts

7/18/24 10:31 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. It's a bit scary doing this without a Finch flag, but the usage is very low and such pages are already broken in Firefox. On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 1:00 AM Mustaq Ahmed wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:20 PM Mike Taylor wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Permissions API on WebView

LGTM1 On 7/18/24 10:34 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: Always exciting to get full cross-platform support! Can you request the privacy / security / enterprise / debuggability / testing review gates on ChromeStatus? After those are in progress I'll be happen to LGTM. On Thursday, July 18, 2024 a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Changes to source-destination-limit logic

> This change will not cause any site breakage or change for end users of Chrome. LGTM1 On 7/11/24 3:48 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails akashna...@google.com , lin...@chromium.org , johni...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS interpolate-size property and calc-size() function

ed spec changes" section of the intent), since technically it's testing stuff that isn't formally required without that. -David On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 2:40 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 7/16/24 2:27 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1! Is this feature full

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Explicit Compile Hints with Magic Comments

Just to clarify: this ran as an OT from 115 to 117, and has been disabled since then? And you're requesting to run another OT (vs extending a currently active one) from 129 to 131. Do I have that correct? On 7/22/24 5:56 AM, 'Marja Hölttä' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails ma..

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label Throughout 3PC Phaseout

LGTM to extend from 127 to 129 inclusive. On 7/15/24 11:56 AM, John Delaney wrote: *Contact emails* johni...@chromium.org, wanderv...@chromium.org, lin...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecation_labeling_explainer.md https://develope

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API: filtering IDs

LGTM1 On 7/17/24 5:24 PM, Alex Turner wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:03 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 7/12/24 10:44 AM, Alex Turner wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:25 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 7/8/24 4:05 PM, Alex Turner wrote: Interoperability and

Re: [blink-dev] Fwd: Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Apologies - I mean to approve from M127 to M129 inclusive (math is hard). On 7/19/24 12:03 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: OK - thanks. It sounds like the majority of the API is specced, with some options to go (I hope I'm interpreting that correctly). LGTM to extend from M127 to M130 inclusive

Re: [blink-dev] Fwd: Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

from happening again, even if the initial I2EE is "fairly mechanical" as you said originally. On Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 1:53:56 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Russ, I'm trying to refresh my memory on the history of this experiment. Ex

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Relaunch: CHIPS on WebView

LGTM3 On 7/18/24 11:24 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 6:49 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:13 PM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev wrote: Hey Vlad, I agree that deleting the affected cookies seems to be the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU extended range (HDR) support

LGTM3 On 7/18/24 9:44 AM, Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:09 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: On Wednesday, July 17, 2024 at 10:41:26 AM UTC+9 Domenic Denicola wrote: This looks like a nice straightforward feature. Just one potential spec issue...

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove PointerEvent.getCoalescedEvents() from insecure contexts

On 7/17/24 10:18 AM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote: > Can you ask for WebKit's position? Or maye there's at least a pointer to working group discussions they participated in? - Safari doesn't yet support PointerEvent.getCoalescedEvents(), so we can't ask for their position on secure/non-secure context d

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS interpolate-size property and calc-size() function

On 7/16/24 2:27 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1! Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests ? Yes https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-values/calc-size I see that m

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Isolated Web Apps

Thanks - before I jump too deeply into the review, would you mind requesting the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? On 7/15/24 2:44 PM, Robbie McElrath wrote: Thanks for taking a look Mike! Are there any things that an IWA needs that DevTools can't currently do? No,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: AudioContext.onerror

LGTM2 On 7/15/24 10:55 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1, thanks for the prompt action! On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:22 PM Hongchan Choi wrote: Hi Domenic, Thanks for your input! I've addressed the issue you opened with 2 PRs: - https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/pull/2593

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Isolated Web Apps

On 7/11/24 8:41 PM, Robbie McElrath wrote: Contact emails rmcelr...@chromium.org, reil...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/isolated-web-apps/blob/main/README.md Specification https://w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API: filtering IDs

On 7/12/24 10:44 AM, Alex Turner wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:25 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 7/8/24 4:05 PM, Alex Turner wrote: Interoperability and Compatibility The Aggregation Service (used to process the aggregatable reports) typically allows its releases to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Rename inset-area to position-area

LGTM3 On 7/11/24 2:18 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:06 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM1 to add `position-area`, since it is an alias for `inset-area` that is shipped and is being deprecated. On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:22 PM Mason Freed wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecation of CSS Anchor Positioning property `inset-area`

LGTM3 On 7/11/24 12:13 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:52 AM Mason Freed wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: From the other emails, there is

Re: [blink-dev] Ready for Developer Testing: Web Authentication API: JSON serialization methods

Hi Martin, Is this intended to be an Intent to Ship, or dev trial? thanks, Mike On 6/26/24 2:28 PM, 'Martin Kreichgauer' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails marti...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/wiki/Explainer:-JSON-Serialization-Methods

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API: filtering IDs

On 7/8/24 4:05 PM, Alex Turner wrote: Contact emails ale...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/blob/main/flexible_filtering.md Specification https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi Brett, We don't yet have an expiration date set for https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#DefaultThirdPartyStoragePartitioningSetting, or any concrete plans to add one. If and when we do decide to deprecate it, we'll give a 6 months deprecation notice through the normal enterprise poli

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

LGTM3 On 7/3/24 11:35 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 Thanks for working through the PR! On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 5:34:54 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 /Daniel On 2024-06-26 20:16, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: The PR is ready and has been *approve

Re: [blink-dev] Fwd: Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

es> without knowing my initial ask was for just 3 milestones.  I apologize for that and am going to seek updating internal processes to add a check to prevent this oversight from happening again, even if the initial I2EE is "fairly mechanical" as you said originally. On Wednesda

Re: [blink-dev] Fwd: Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Hi Russ, I'm trying to refresh my memory on the history of this experiment. Experiment first approved on 10/19/23 for M119 to M121, https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2bwMHd3Yz7I/m/BzI3_qoCAwAJ Request on 4/4/24 to renew from M124 to M127, https://groups.google.com/a/ch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reverse origin trial for Standardized CSS zoom

Oh - also, can you request the Privacy, Security, Debuggability bits in chromestatus? thx On 6/26/24 11:04 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: On 6/25/24 5:31 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:54 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 6/25/24 4:23 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Tue, Jun 25

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reverse origin trial for Standardized CSS zoom

On 6/25/24 5:31 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:54 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 6/25/24 4:23 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:24 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks for creating this - can you clarify how long you would like this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reverse origin trial for Standardized CSS zoom

On 6/25/24 4:23 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:24 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks for creating this - can you clarify how long you would like this deprecation trial to last? That will depend on the response from site owners and the level of uptake, but the initial

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reverse origin trial for Standardized CSS zoom

Thanks for creating this - can you clarify how long you would like this deprecation trial to last? On 6/24/24 7:52 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: Contact emails sza...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9699 Des

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

Thanks - LGTM1 On 6/24/24 11:02 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Done! Mike Taylor writes: Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: Contact emails raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com , juha.j.vai...@intel.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Digital Credential API

LGTM to experiment for 6 milestones from M128 to M133 inclusive. On 6/22/24 1:44 PM, Rick Byers wrote: Hello blink-dev, I'd like to request permission to start an OT for this API. There's still a lot to figure out in the larger space of digital credentials on the web

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Aggregate Debug Reporting

LGTM2 On 6/12/24 11:25 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:21 PM Nan Lin wrote: Hi Yoav, The list of debugging signals is part of the spec: https://wicg.github.io/attribution-reporting-api/#source-debug-data-type https://wicg.github.io/attributio

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Allow trusted bidding signals to trigger interest group updates

On 6/4/24 1:53 PM, Caleb Raitto wrote: Response inline On Monday, June 3, 2024 at 10:16:06 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/31/24 11:40 PM, Paul Jensen wrote: Contact emails pauljen...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1095 <ht

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS ruby-align property

LGTM2 On 6/7/24 1:39 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: Sorry, make that "LGTM1" On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:39 AM chrishtr via Chromestatus > wrote: LGTM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "b

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

GTMs as it was a non-standard experiment. Does this extension also require 3? Thanks again! On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 1:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM to extend one more milestone (M126). On 6/5/24 11:57 PM, John Delaney wrote: We would like to extend the Cookie Deprecation Label ex

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

LGTM to extend one more milestone (M126). On 6/5/24 11:57 PM, John Delaney wrote: We would like to extend the Cookie Deprecation Label experimental feature being used for Chrome Facilitated Testing.  This feature previously received approval to run through the end of M125 (ending roughly Jun

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: No-Vary-Search Hint for Prerender Speculation Rules

LGTM1 On 6/5/24 11:21 PM, Liviu Tinta wrote: Contact emails dome...@chromium.org, jbro...@chromium.org, liviuti...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#no-vary-search-hint

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: No-Vary-Search support for prerender

LGTM1 - I'm very happy to see this ship. On 6/6/24 11:42 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: I will abstain from approving this feature as an API Owner, as one of the people responsible for it. But I will urge other API owners to approve it, and give a bit of reasoning. In my opinion, this is a strai

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAuthn hints

On 6/4/24 9:50 PM, Adam Langley wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 7:36 PM Mike Taylor wrote: (oops, accidentally removed agl@ from To, fixing) On 6/4/24 11:35 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Adam, Could you please request reviews (or N/A, if you have internal approvals) for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Restrict "private network requests" for subresources from public websites to secure contexts.

Hi Emily, A few questions inline: On 6/1/24 5:05 AM, Emily Stark wrote: Contact emails est...@google.com, jdebla...@google.com, dadr...@google.com, l...@chromium.org, tito...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org, mk...@chromium.org, v...@chromium.org Explainer https://githu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAuthn hints

(oops, accidentally removed agl@ from To, fixing) On 6/4/24 11:35 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Adam, Could you please request reviews (or N/A, if you have internal approvals) for Privacy, Security, and Enterprise bits in your chromestatus entry? thx, Mike On 6/4/24 5:59 AM, Adam Langley

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAuthn hints

Hi Adam, Could you please request reviews (or N/A, if you have internal approvals) for Privacy, Security, and Enterprise bits in your chromestatus entry? thx, Mike On 6/4/24 5:59 AM, Adam Langley wrote: Contact emails a...@chromium.org Specification https://w3c.github.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Allow trusted bidding signals to trigger interest group updates

On 5/31/24 11:40 PM, Paul Jensen wrote: Contact emails pauljen...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1095 Specification https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1124

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: 0.0.0.0 for Private Network Access

On 6/4/24 6:26 AM, 'Kagami Rosylight' via blink-dev wrote: > /Gecko/: Closed Without a Position (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/143) It looks like it's closed with position: "worth prototyping", though? Or is there another issue that is closed without position? I can

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support Video Chapter in MediaMetadata

LGTM3 On 5/31/24 4:08 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 5:52 AM 'Jiaming Cheng' via blink-dev wrote: Thanks Domenic :] On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:28 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. This feature and its spec fits well with the exi

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebGPU: GPUAdapter info attribute

LGTM3 On 5/31/24 4:07 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:35 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: In that case, LGTM1. On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 2:31 PM François Beaufort wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 3:16 AM Domenic Denicola wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compression Dictionary Transport

29, 2024 at 10:22 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks all. LGTM to extend from 127 to 129 inclusive. On 5/29/24 10:51 AM, Patrick Meenan wrote: On the spec side of things, there is one more issue out

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compression Dictionary Transport

fy) wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 4:31 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi there, Would you mind commenting on progress for the following items, per OT renewal guidelines: Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associat

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Importmap integrity

LGTM1 On 5/24/24 3:13 PM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 7:12 PM Panos Astithas wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:16 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:29 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Tuesday,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compression Dictionary Transport

Hi there, Would you mind commenting on progress for the following items, per OT renewal guidelines: Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated with the appropriate standardization venue, or WICG) TAG review (see exceptions) bit.ly/blink-signals requests Outreach for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unrestricted WebUSB (available only to Isolated Web Apps)

LGTM1 to ship this for IWAs only. On 5/22/24 2:11 PM, Reilly Grant wrote: LGTM as an IWA OWNER (3x LGTM from Blink API OWNERS are still required according to the IWA-specific API launch process ). This is a good example of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

LGTM3, and +1 to Yoav's suggestion. On 5/29/24 1:00 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 Please make sure that use of the old syntax triggers some kind of developer-facing warning, so that it won't be too hard to catch the cause for the behavior change in the few sites that will be affected

Re: [blink-dev] RE: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: reporting timeouts & multiple-bids

LGTM3 On 5/29/24 4:34 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Thursday, May 23, 2024 at 1:01:53 AM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 3:07 PM 'Erik Anderson' via blink-dev wrote: Hi, Thanks for reaching out. We’ve reviewed the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM to extend the deprecation trial M127-M132 inclusive On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/22/24 8:11 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:55 PM Mike Taylor wrote: ** *Contact

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-size-adjust with the two-value syntax

LGTM2 On 5/23/24 12:06 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Thank you for looking into the test failures, ChangSeok! LGTM1 to align with Firefox and Safari on the remaining failures (except the reftests with minor pixel differences) and shipping! On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:05 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

ation trial run for 9 months. It might be ok to limit this to 6-months, but would like the option to extend the depreciation period if needed. On Friday, May 10, 2024 at 12:38:47 PM UTC-7 Vladimir Levin wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:18 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Is there a chromes

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Importmap integrity

I'm inclined to LGTM this now - but don't see a lot of harm waiting for 1 additional week (per Mozilla's request in the not-public minutes). Happy to do so before, so long as the HTML PR lands. On 5/22/24 5:15 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:29 AM Yoav Weiss (@Sho

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unrestricted WebUSB (available only to Isolated Web Apps)

Could you please request the various Privacy, Security, Enterprise, etc. review gates in your chromestatus entry? On 5/22/24 1:08 PM, 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails mattreyno...@chromium.org Specification https://wicg.github.io/webusb/#permissions-pol

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >