Re: [Bloat] [Starlink] [Rpm] [LibreQoS] net neutrality back in the news

2023-09-30 Thread Sebastian Moeller via Bloat
So, let me start wit a big caveat: I am just an internet end-user and have no insight into the ISP side of things. Nor am I a lawyer and hence might moss some of the subtleties of the regulation and their translation into law in each member state. > On Sep 30, 2023, at 14:42, Vint Cerf wrote:

Re: [Bloat] [Starlink] [Rpm] [LibreQoS] net neutrality back in the news

2023-09-30 Thread Vint Cerf via Bloat
the phrase "treat equally" can (maybe should?) be interpreted as offering the same options for traffic handling to all parties on the same terms and conditions. If there is only one class of service, then equally is the only option. If there are multiple classes of service, then these could

Re: [Bloat] [Starlink] [Rpm] [LibreQoS] net neutrality back in the news

2023-09-29 Thread Sebastian Moeller via Bloat
Hi Gert, > On Sep 29, 2023, at 08:31, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 08:24:13AM +0200, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink > wrote: >> [SM] In the EU we have this as a continuous lobbying effort by big >> incumbent ISPs (a move to have the large content providers