Hi Jordan,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> Have you guys considered using Planet as a Chemistry blogspace
> aggregator? It's pretty easy to setup and scales well. Ubuntu[1],
> GNOME[2], and Debian[3] are some common examples that I know of.
We used to use the PlanetPlanet
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> cc: Blue Obelisk mailing list
>
> Hi Lewis (and all),
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, lewis robinson wrote:
>> Chemical blogspace - latest posts
>
> Can you give me a link? This seems ok:
>
> http://cb.openmolecules.net/posts.php
>
>
I can probably be persuaded to build and script in SL or for web-based
databases and the like.
One of my SL contacts was building a chemistry lab, but I can't get in world
right now to give you a name. University of Nottingham have some pharmacology
labs, AdminNotts Waffle would be the contact
Tim Vandermeersch wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Graham Klyne
> wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> That would be a fun thing to add to Shuffl! I like it.
>>
>> What I'd need would be a Javascript library that takes the raw chemical data
>> in some form (I'm not familiar with how such things are u
Peter,
That would be a fun thing to add to Shuffl! I like it.
What I'd need would be a Javascript library that takes the raw chemical data in
some form (I'm not familiar with how such things are usually represented -
CML?)
and creates a rendering into a DOM object or canvas. Given that, I co
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Leidert
> wrote:
>> Further please note, that only one CCO (at least I
>> guess you mean the Creative Commons license series) license qualifies
>> for Debian main and I would like t
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Leidert
wrote:
> Further please note, that only one CCO (at least I
> guess you mean the Creative Commons license series) license qualifies
> for Debian main and I would like to leave bodr in the main section of
> Debian without stripping stuff.
Am Donnerstag, den 17.06.2010, 08:06 +0100 schrieb Peter Murray-Rust:
> 2010/6/17 Egon Willighagen
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
> > For my project OpenThermo (also on SourceForge) I've
> created a list of nuclear spin values for
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> I would prefer not to use the phrase "copyright owner" unless it is clear
> what is being copyrighted. You cannot formally copyright the data (although
> people do). You can copyright the database under European law though I would
> disco
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Egon Willighagen <
egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Peter Murray-Rust
> wrote:
> > If this is truly data it is better to declare it as Open data and choose
> a
> > licence compatible with that PPDL or CC0.
>
> Tha
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> If this is truly data it is better to declare it as Open data and choose a
> licence compatible with that PPDL or CC0.
Thanx for brining this up. The current MIT license was picked as best
thing around at the time. When I made
2010/6/17 Egon Willighagen
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
> > For my project OpenThermo (also on SourceForge) I've created a list of
> nuclear spin values for main isotope of some elements (first 5 periods). Now
> I think this information may be interseting for
12 matches
Mail list logo
