Hi Bernhard, guys, :-)
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:38, Bernhard Dippold
bernh...@familie-dippold.at wrote:
The Bylaws have been approved by the SC during their last call (or the one
before), so they are already adopted.
I have seen *no* announcement about this on the TDF Discuss list. Plus
I
Hi David,
Before answering through your lines, I would just like to say that I
feel sad because you even don't try to understand who we are before
accusing us with very strong words.
But ok, I've choose to be in the SC and I assume it, even if that means
being judged harshly, my aim is and
Hello David,
Le Sun, 9 Jan 2011 17:27:54 +0800,
David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz a écrit :
But the SC has legitimacy until September - I didn't hear any
possible sponsor asking for a shorter period of time.
Please can someone explain, with no bullshit, why we have to wait 9
more
Hi, :-)
@Sophie: Me, too, I was a little saddened at your answers.
a) I am not bringing up this issue because of any response to my
proposal about the website management. I said at least a couple of
times that the SC needs to take some kind of decision in order to
ensure it gets managed properly
Hi David, *,
Am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2011, 16:12:21 schrieb David Nelson:
(...)
I do *hope* I am wrong. I hope all of the above is true.
For the moment, I have not seen the proof. ;-)
Don't *tell* me I'm wrong, *show* me I'm wrong. ;-)
I'm a a long time contributor to OOo and now of
Hi, :-)
I took the liberty of adding an item to the agenda of the next SC
meeting on Thursday, Jan 13, for you to discuss and decide about the
future management of the website.
I have explained my ideas about the need for an editorial team, I am
not trying to push any personal agenda.
My only
