Emiliano Vavassori wrote on 05/02/2021 14:26:
> +1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them:
>
> * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before)
> 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by
> Collabora)
> * OpenGrok needs
Sorry, thought I already did answer in this vote, but there were
some remarks from Emiliano, so:
Still +1 also for the clarification of Emiliano throughout,
because with the latest infos from Guilhem and as we then do not
have another tooling / play ground in
Hello,
Emiliano Vavassori wrote on 05.02.21 at 14:26:
"rewind branches onhttps://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
being deny all write
operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll
freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for
free,
Emiliano Vavassori 於 2021/2/5 下午9:26 寫道:
Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto:
Hi,
I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow.
+1 also on Emiliano's comment.
Paolo
On 05/02/2021 14:26, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
> Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
>> misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my
Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
> * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before)
> 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by
> Collabora)
>
Yep, that was implied, +1
> * OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit
>
Yep, that was Guilhem's proposal, +1
>
Hi all,
there were already sensible remarks from other board members, so not
to bring more complexity in here, just
+1 from my side.
Thanks
Lothar
Am 02.02.2021 um 18:10 schrieb Daniel
Armando Rodriguez:
Hi,
El 2021-02-05 10:26, Emiliano Vavassori escribió:
Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto:
Hi,
I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed
Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
> misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
> is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support.
>
> "rewind
Daniel Armando Rodriguez 於 2021/2/3 上午1:10 寫道:
Hi,
I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support.
"rewind branches on
Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote on 02/02/2021 18:10:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
> misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
> is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support.
>
> "rewind branches
Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
> "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
> being deny all write
> operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll
> freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for
> free, and if/when we
+1 from me including the review and reversal of the 1b vote in light of
the new information received.
Paolo
On 02/02/2021 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
> misunderstood the implication of such vote.
On 02/02/2021 17:28, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On 02/02/2021 17:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
>> "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
>> being deny all write
>> operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side.
>
> +1
Let me
On 02/02/2021 17:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
> "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
> being deny all write
> operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side.
+1
Michael.
--
michael.me...@collabora.com <><, GM
Hi,
I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support.
"rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
being
16 matches
Mail list logo
