Hi Tom, all!
A quick note ... mis-using the steering-discuss being an SC deputy.
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2011, 10:35 +0100 schrieb Tom Davies:
Sounds good to me but i'm curious about the Branding Team's thoughts on this.
Italo?
I'm not Italo, but I'm one of those who (with Bernhard, Nik,
Hi,
Von: Charles-H. Schulz
I'd +1 Thorsten's short summary, but does it work with Debian rules?
yes - it daoes, bacuse ...
Le 10 août 2011 14:34, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org a
écrit :
The tm rule then boils down to: stuff from the official tdf/libo
website - TDF
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 14:31 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Caolan McNamara wrote:
Imho quite easy to resolve: use the community logos per default for
builds
from source. Enable the Logo with TDF tagline on build time and tell
people
to use this only when doing builds that
Hi :)
Thanks for jumping in there :) I hoped there were other people from Branding
around or at least other people that might have some vague idea about the
issues.
It's ok for the rest of us to guess but it's better to have the right answers
from the right people because there is a strong
Hi,
This is a short reminder about the purpose of this list. It has been setup
to serve as the SC / BoD primary communication channel. Therefore it
accomodates SC members requests from project members. While we do
appreciate everyone's input we'd like to keep non-essential content on other
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:10 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hi,
This is a short reminder about the purpose of this list. It has been setup
to serve as the SC / BoD primary communication channel. Therefore it
accomodates SC members requests from project members. While we do
appreciate
Hi Drew,
While there's a list for confidential matters we intend and want to have a
dexision making process that's transparent. This list was designed with the
notion that it'd be both a formal tool (voting, opinions of the BoD
members, etc.) and a communication tool for important an urgent
Hi,
I find this list to be a very useful point of contact with the SC. If
people avoid using it for other purposes than discussions in which
there is a genuine utility in involving the SC then SC members will be
encouraged to read it regularly and properly, and the list will indeed
serve its true
Hello,
let me jump in quickly with a few thoughts:
- The set-up of this list was discussed in one of last year's steering
commitee public conference calls, and if I remember correctly, it was
even a demand by the community, not by the steering committee. (Which
does not mean we do not
