Hi, :-)
I took the liberty of adding an item to the agenda of the next SC
meeting on Thursday, Jan 13, for you to discuss and decide about the
future management of the website.
I have explained my ideas about the need for an editorial team, I am
not trying to push any personal agenda.
My only wi
Hi Charles, guys :-)
I've read all your responses. Thanks for having taken time to give me
an answer. ;-)
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 00:28, Charles-H. Schulz
wrote:
> I'm not really comfortable with this extraordinary powers over that
> period and I would rather favour you driving a team (-an offici
Hi David
I went thru several opinions in this list on your proposal and I feel
myself not confortable with it. Much have been said, which I agree, and
your proposal has its value and merit, but it bears a risk and a way to
work with communitites that does not comply with our experiences.
The
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 15:52 +0300, sophie wrote:
> Hi David,
> On 07/01/2011 18:12, David Nelson wrote:
> > Hi guys, :-)
> this is the girl of the story ;)
> > I would like to make a proposal. I consider that the libreoffice.org
> > website is a resource that can be of strategic importance to TDF a
:52:48
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: Decisions about libreoffice.org English
main
site management
Hi David,
On 07/01/2011 18:12, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi guys, :-)
this is the girl of the story ;)
> I would like to make a proposal. I consider that the libreoffice.org
> website is a
Hi David,
On 07/01/2011 18:12, David Nelson wrote:
Hi guys, :-)
this is the girl of the story ;)
I would like to make a proposal. I consider that the libreoffice.org
website is a resource that can be of strategic importance to TDF and
the community. I have a bunch of ideas for further developin
Hi David, *,
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:12 PM, David Nelson wrote:
>
> To do that job, I would ask - for a period of 4 months, subsequently
> renewable on condition of the SC's approval - for complete authority
> and final veto on all content on the libreoffice.org website.
I have to agree with th
On 1/7/11 4:12 PM, David Nelson wrote:
To do that job, I would ask - for a period of 4 months, subsequently
renewable on condition of the SC's approval - for complete authority
and final veto on all content on the libreoffice.org website. I want
to be considered *the boss* of the libreoffice.org
> I'm not really comfortable with this extraordinary powers over that
> period and I would rather favour you driving a team (-an official team
> that is-) . However, this is the Steering Discuss list, which means
> that you have written an official and public request to the SC and we
> are bound to
Hi guys, :-)
I would like to make a proposal. I consider that the libreoffice.org
website is a resource that can be of strategic importance to TDF and
the community. I have a bunch of ideas for further developing it and
using it to further the project's aims and interests.
To do that job, I would
m
Tom :)
From: Charles-H. Schulz
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 7 January, 2011 12:11:40
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: Decisions about libreoffice.org English
main
site management
Hello David,
Le Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:07:31 +0800,
David Nels
Hello David,
Le Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:07:31 +0800,
David Nelson a écrit :
> Hi Michael, :-)
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 05:36, Michael Meeks
> wrote:
> >> a clear decision about the management of the libreoffice.org
> >> website. It's an important tool for marketing. I have plenty of
> >> ideas a
Hi all, may I jump in with a few experiences with a decade of OSS
development and community mgmt (boy, do I feel important now :-))
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:07:31 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> > Here is my clear idea: since you are doing the work - you get to own
> > it, lead it, and those tha
Hi Michael, :-)
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 05:36, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> a clear decision about the management of the libreoffice.org
>> website. It's an important tool for marketing. I have plenty of ideas
>> about how to market with it
>
> Here is my clear idea: since you are doing the work
Hi David,
Mangling two mails together:
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 01:25 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> a clear decision about the management of the libreoffice.org
> website. It's an important tool for marketing. I have plenty of ideas
> about how to market with it
Here is my clear idea
15 matches
Mail list logo
