El Lunes 17 Ago 2009 20:56:27 Eric J Korpela escribió:
> 2) Is IMKL or ACML covered by the GPL v2 clause "However, as a
> special exception, the source code distributed need not include
> anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
> form) with the major components (compiler,
A. I get the (significantly more complicated) picture. The
questions to ask in that case...
1) Is the copyright individually held or is the copyright held by the
consortium as an entity? I am assuming the former from your post. If
so, you would need the permission of any copyright holder
Hi Eric,
On 8/17/09 7:43 PM, Eric J Korpela wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Bruce Allen wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> If I understand correctly, you would also need permission from all the
>> s...@home developers who did development under GPL.
>
> That is true. The number of developers with
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Bruce Allen wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> If I understand correctly, you would also need permission from all the
> s...@home developers who did development under GPL.
That is true. The number of developers with accepted contributions
who were not paid for their work (in w
El Lunes 17 Ago 2009 10:29:43 Bruce Allen escribió:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 8/17/09 7:05 AM, Eric J Korpela wrote:
> > Well, at this point s...@home is all GPL code unless we agree to release
> > it under a different license. We also use ASMLIB, but that is neither
> > required nor irreplaceable. In o
I've been cleaning them up as they come into my mail. I've probably cleaned
up 20 this evening.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Ian Hay
wrote:
> More spam on closed Trac tickets, this time by greg
>
> http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/ticket/749#comment:2
> http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/ticket/7
Hi Eric,
On 8/17/09 7:05 AM, Eric J Korpela wrote:
> Well, at this point s...@home is all GPL code unless we agree to release
> it under a different license. We also use ASMLIB, but that is neither
> required nor irreplaceable. In order to release s...@home under a
> different license we wou
More spam on closed Trac tickets, this time by greg
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/ticket/749#comment:2
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/ticket/763#comment:2
--
Ian
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailm
This does not really quite fix the problem. Unfortunately, if you have an
N processor machine, a task that needs to run high priority, and an N
processor task that wants to run, then you will have N+1 processors
assigned unless N==1. A worse example would have N-1 tasks with deadline
pressure and
