[boinc_dev] project preferences application names not showing up

2013-05-29 Thread Travis Desell
On Wildlife@Home's project preferences pages, it lists the applications which can be selected to run as: Application one Application two Instead of their actual names. Any reason this would be happening, or any good way to fix it? --Travis --

Re: [boinc_dev] prepared to accept patches for llvm, i.e. clang, compatibility?

2013-05-29 Thread Charlie Fenton
Hi Steffen, For what it's worth, I have been building BOINC on the Mac using the "LLVM GCC 4.2" compiler for quite some time with no problems. (This is one of two compilers provided as part of Xcode 4.4.1, the other is "Apple LLVM Compiler 4.0".) According to Apple's documentation: > In Xcode

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_loc] [patch] .po files with issues RUSSIAN

2013-05-29 Thread Rom Walton
I will see what I can do. The git migration made everything interesting. - Rom From: boinc_loc [mailto:boinc_loc-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Nikolay Saharov Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:21 PM To: Gianfranco Costamagna Cc: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu; boinc_...@ssl.ber

Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_loc] [patch] .po files with issues RUSSIAN

2013-05-29 Thread Nikolay Saharov
Hi, Fixed in BTS. PS: This error is strange. Why there should be additional empty strings if translated text is shorter than the original msg? PPS: Rom, could you please update all BTS translation projects from sources? I think there are a lot of new untranslated strings. The last update was

Re: [boinc_dev] [patch] .po files with issues RUSSIAN

2013-05-29 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Sorry for quoting the entire digest anyway the bug in de.po fixed by Steffen http://i18n.debian.org/l10n-pkg-status/b/boinc.html is not only in de, but on ru too ru.po:371 so would be nice for the russian translator to fix it too. thanks Gianfranco - Messaggio originale - > Da: "bo

Re: [boinc_dev] could the git comment be more descriptive or better empty ?

2013-05-29 Thread Oliver Bock
On 5/29/13 11:51 , "Steffen Möller" wrote: >> Yeah - I was just grumbling about a commit with the only message >> >> "Include instead of various places" >> >> nothing else - and of course gitk shows for a dozen of files such a >> change. Every ?!&%%$$ user can see the diff using gitk - so im

Re: [boinc_dev] could the git comment be more descriptive or better empty ?

2013-05-29 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Toralf, > > Yeah - I was just grumbling about a commit with the only message > > "Include instead of various places" > > nothing else - and of course gitk shows for a dozen of files such a > change. Every ?!&%%$$ user can see the diff using gitk - so important > IMO is just a short n

[boinc_dev] prepared to accept patches for llvm, i.e. clang, compatibility?

2013-05-29 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, The compiler LLVM (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clang) makes continuous progress, both technically and for its acceptance in the community, and is faster than gcc/g++ in some cases. They have a gcc-compatibility frontent called "clang", which after a countable number of patches I could

Re: [boinc_dev] could the git comment be more descriptive or better empty ?

2013-05-29 Thread Toralf Förster
On 05/29/2013 01:08 AM, Charlie Fenton wrote: > I agree with Jord that 'quick updates', or 'quick fixes' is not helpful, but > I also don't want to see empty commit messages. I feel that _every_ commit > should have a commit message briefly describing what was changed and why. Yeah - I was just